ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 62,568
Restating my question back at me is not an answer to the question, It's an evasion. A rather obvious one at that. Plus it shows that you can't form an answer because that answer destroys your debate position.
Step by step:
IF the cross is a symbol of Christianity, then it violates the 2nd Commandment. If it isn't, then it's not a "symbol" of anything and it's the viewer/wearer who embues the ideology into it and destroying the item changes nothing about the belief.
The same logic applies to the statues.
It's pointing out your absurd premise.
The cross is a symbol of christianity, which is why crosses are prevelant at churches and worn as jewelry by christians.
Whether it truly represents the religion without the human being or not is irrelevant, as the entirety of the discussion involves human beings. The statues would t exist.
Why you continue the bullshit argument is beyond me.