Planned Parenthood Prez: Fund Planned Parenthood to stop abortion

Making everyone pay for their own shit is in no way preventing anyone from acting in accordance with their conscience.

You're pro PPH, that's cool...but you don't have to be so dishonest when arguing for public funding of PPH.

Just be honest, and tell everyone you think they should pay for other people to fuck and fuck up.

"Fuck, and fuck up." Heh.

I don't know that that is necessarily the issue though because we already do that. I got a lot more tax breaks over the years for having a wife and 5 kids then someone who is single with no kids. Although when I was first married it would have been advantageous tax-wise to simply live together.

PP and its useful idiots like adrina actually do have to be dishonest about what it is they want. She is upset because without Federal funds being siphoned over into abortions, PP would not be the wealthy successful abortion mill that it is.

PP is upset because without being able to shuffle all tvat Fed monet around, it could it afford to fulfill Marget Sangers dream of being located in every low-income area of every major city, culling minority procreative products.

Without a doubt, they have suppressed the prevalence of the black population, and that is just what we know of the mother's ethnicity.

If they openly admitted that the core of their services and the bulk of their clinician's time and expenditures were slpent performing abortions, Hyde would have to be repealed to fund them. That would not even make it out of commitee.

As a matter of public policy funding on demand abortions makes a lot of sense. you have to assume that women are keenly aware of their financial circumstances and their own temperament as to whether they have the financial and emotional support necessary to raise children. Plenty of people on just a glance are pretty poor prospects. Fathers that have been in and out of jail, families or single mothers living on public assistance, those with any physical or mental defects with genetic causation would all be money ahead to not only pay for it but to actively encourage it.

But that isn't the conversation that Planned Parenthood wants to have openly.

This being the America of rags to riches, a country that doesn't believe in castes,and passing the sins of the fathers on to the children, its reasonable for some to strongly object to the above rationale for government participation in abortion.

Then there are those that truly do see abortion as not only insidious evil for the termination of human life and all the potential that snuffs out, but the general commentary that says about valuing life which bleeds over into such discussions about euthanasia and the death penalty.

Some people are all over the map. Distraught over exploiting chickens for eggs, unaffected by terminating fertized human ovum. Horrified about a drug that prevents an implantation of a fertilized egg, but no problem with wars and the death penalty.

Eyer is the only person I've met that is consistantly pro-life.
 
Let’s get something straight.

With the exception of abortion services and anonymity (in certain states), there isn't one medical/gynacological/birth control service offered at PPH that a woman cannot get at the local county health or walk in clinic. Usually at equally low cost or free (for those that qualify for medicaid) as in the case at PPH.

So let's stop with the fallacy that de-funding PPH is going to deny a woman access to essential female health services. It isn't.

They cannot handle the overflow.

There aren't enough clinics. We need more clinics. Not less. There's already a shortage of health services in this country.

Why take away some when we are already inadequately supplied?
 
Making everyone pay for their own shit is in no way preventing anyone from acting in accordance with their conscience.

You're pro PPH, that's cool...but you don't have to be so dishonest when arguing for public funding of PPH.

Just be honest, and tell everyone you think they should pay for other people to fuck and fuck up.

Just be honest and admit you don't know how to debate without making wild extrapolations. :rolleyes:
 
I used to work in publishing but left in 2011.

I am still an insane reader of books as well as online stuff. Sometimes I stay up all night following a rabbit hole. Last night I learned about AI videos on YouTube - this is fresh, happening right now - targeted to toddlers with weird adult themes such as violence, lying and a but of ass play. They use Disney characters yet there is no cease and desist.... Hmmm. Also an occult background to Pepe... That is of course he same school as Podesta and his 14/fish wiki leak pic. Weird Crowley shit. Another hmmm...

I love rabbit holes, and I've only recently started going to YouTube. Based on what it recommends for me I am often amused. It is definitely confused about my political persuasions. I avoided YouTube for a lot of reasons different places that I have lived in were a little spotty or for internet coverage on my phone which is what I've been using for the past two years. My latest little Casita has pretty good coverage because apparently my neighbors aren't using it.

When I had great high-speed hard line internet I still avoided videos because I would much rather read than have some news reader read it to me. I read much faster than they do. I've decided I'm going to have to give up on my fantasy unlimited reading material on the internet. It just doesn't exist. Content is all going to video these days. I don't know why but I take in information much better and faster in text form than audio.

yesterday I clicked on one of those obvious clickbait sites because the story they were pimping sounded interesting about some guy that wandered off into the Maine woods and live for a couple of decades quietly stealing only what he needed from cabins.

I just told you the entire story. In order to learn that story and whether there was actually anything more interesting in that story there were literally 55 individual clicks of really horribly written prose. plus a half a dozen or so extraneous clicks where I hit the wrong portion of the screen and ended up getting some add that they were trying to get me to click on.

Hence, the books I had Goodwill on half-price day and picked up a dozen books.
 
Just be honest and admit you don't know how to debate without making wild extrapolations. :rolleyes:

You think what you do is actual, rhetorical debate? That is adorable.

Here I was thinking that you were just a quarrelsome person. Sorry.

I didn't know that you have no idea what the difference is between a debate and a simple quarrel.
 
You think what you do is actual, rhetorical debate? That is adorable.

Here I was thinking that you were just a quarrelsome person. Sorry.

I didn't know that you have no idea what the difference is between a debate and a simple quarrel.

:rolleyes: Whatever dude.
 
They cannot handle the overflow.

There aren't enough clinics. We need more clinics. Not less. There's already a shortage of health services in this country.

Why take away some when we are already inadequately supplied?

Just keep giving MILLIONS of dollars to the best politically connected entity and continue to underfund everyone else?

Here's an idea:

How about Planned Parenthood that cares so much about "women's health" take their 700 million dollars a year in "excess profits" and start "spreading that wealth around" the way Obama lectured Joe the Plumber that caring and compassionate people should. How many clinics could be funded for seven hundred million dollars a year? Especially in the lower an inner-city areas where Planned Parenthood sets of their "health" clinics.
 
Just keep giving MILLIONS of dollars to the best politically connected entity and continue to underfund everyone else?

Here's an idea:

How about Planned Parenthood that cares so much about "women's health" take their 700 million dollars a year in "excess profits" and start "spreading that wealth around" the way Obama lectured Joe the Plumber that caring and compassionate people should. How many clinics could be funded for seven hundred million dollars a year? Especially in the lower an inner-city areas where Planned Parenthood sets of their "health" clinics.

Again, whatever dude. You've proven what dog you have in this fight. You're not worth it. :rolleyes:
 
Again, whatever dude. You've proven what dog you have in this fight. You're not worth it. :rolleyes:

And you are not willing to answer the question... why can't they take their 700mil and set up more clinics? It is supposed to be a public service as PP says. What do they need 700mil profit for?
 
And you are not willing to answer the question... why can't they take their 700mil and set up more clinics? It is supposed to be a public service as PP says. What do they need 700mil profit for?

I don't do their books. And frankly in all honesty, I don't really have too much concern for it. There are far bigger sources of waste going on - in medicare and in the government itself. Ones that actually aren't investments into society.

Frankly I'm not even sure about the $700 mil as the only things I found on it were from a bunch of anti-abortion propaganda sites. And like hell I'm going to entertain someone's circle jerk when the only reason they are in this debate is to try to piss me off.

The reality is still that there are not enough clinics. Even the $700 mil would not be enough to set up enough clinics. Especially at the rate the anti-abortion zealots have been getting them shut down.

Why isn't pro-choice adequate? Why isn't pro-choice acceptable? Why must it be no abortions?
 
The part where the woman makes the decision for herself and has unfettered access to medical care.

The process? So you're squeamish? Or is it the control freak aspect? Do you want or need a sanitized life?

Apparently you're far too histrionic to deal with the realities of abortion.
It's definitely the control freak aspect. Que's posts practically shout it. I'm sure you've noticed that he responds very differently when he thinks he's answering a woman.
 
It's definitely the control freak aspect. Que's posts practically shout it. I'm sure you've noticed that he responds very differently when he thinks he's answering a woman.

Yes. Very much so.
 
It's definitely the control freak aspect. Que's posts practically shout it. I'm sure you've noticed that he responds very differently when he thinks he's answering a woman.
Almost word for word what the hive is saying about Trump. Do you ever entertain an original thought in your head?

This is the new "You just can't stand a black guy in the Whitehouse" meme.

Took the collective consciousness long enough to shift gears. You and your mindless cohorts had been primed for, "You just can't stand a woman in the Whitehouse."

Took some tweaking but the new meme both explains why Hillary lost and makes any rebuttal of a strident, nonsensical critique of the current occupant misogyny. Now when Maxine Waters, Nancy "Early Dementia" Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, or adrina says something stupid, pointing that out "Trying to control women."

Too FF. I have you accusing me of misogony, and Rob continually calling me sissy, or various women's names because he can't think of anything more insisting than all things feminine.

How about you, manly man? Can you answer any of the "debate" points that adrina dodged while accusing me of being a rabid anti-abortion nut upset by women aborting my hypothetical children? Any at all?

Adrina, when at a loss, does spin quite a yarn. Maybe she and Rob can hook up.
 

Intentional.

Unlike the repeated examples of misandry in your various statements. Where you are completely unaware of the irony.

...Cue the intersectionality of victimhood speech where no black is a racist and no woman can demean men because male, white privilege.
 
No, just you.

Yeah.

You are totally not trolling for humiliation masturbatory fodder. You're fat, ugly, and stupid. There. Was it good for you? Did you cum hard?
 
Intentional.

Unlike the repeated examples of misandry in your various statements. Where you are completely unaware of the irony.

...Cue the intersectionality of victimhood speech where no black is a racist and no woman can demean men because male, white privilege.

I'm just gonna rename you BotanyBoy. It's not like you don't already have enough ID's and accounts... what's one more nick eh.
 
Yeah.

You are totally not trolling for humiliation masturbatory fodder. You're fat, ugly, and stupid. There. Was it good for you? Did you cum hard?

If one had a humilliation fetish, they would either see themselves as being like that, or base their identity on any of those.
Which I obviously don't.

But keep on with your preoccupation with people's presumed sexual fetishes, Dr. Freud. :rose:
 
I'm just gonna rename you BotanyBoy. It's not like you don't already have enough ID's and accounts... what's one more nick eh.

I'd take that as high praise, even coming from soneome with hashtag level cluelessness and equal level brashness about insinuating herself into the ongoing intrigue that she knows nothing about due to her recent incarnation.
 
Again, what the fuck is your problem with abortion?

Straight up to the point, why is it such a goddamn big fucking deal if a woman has an abortion?

Why don't babykillers like you off yourself instead of totally innocent & completely innocent human life?
 
Careful, eyore. You can go to prison for that sort of thing now.



Also, aren't you dead yet?
 
I'd take that as high praise, even coming from soneome with hashtag level cluelessness and equal level brashness about insinuating herself into the ongoing intrigue that she knows nothing about due to her recent incarnation.

Indeed. :rolleyes:
 
Why don't babykillers like you off yourself instead of totally innocent & completely innocent human life?

No human life is innocent - especially at this stage of the game. But hey let's have hyperbole and inflammatory language guide policy that effects half the population cuz.. yeah that's the thing to do. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top