Overwhelming Negative Reporting In The MSM, According To Harvard Study

[Rightguide]

[Please do not post copyright material without citation, and then limit your excerpts to less than 5 paragraphs, per our forum guidelines.]

 

[jaF0]

Dump 'Rump by any means necessary. Hopefully he goes out in disgrace.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Proof of negative reporting on Trump is no proof of unfair reporting on Trump. In fact, it would be unfair if it were positive.

 

[Wrong Element]

Proof of negative reporting on Trump is no proof of unfair reporting on Trump. In fact, it would be unfair if it were positive.

Pretty much what I would have said. "Reporting on historic shitshow describes Trump presidency as shitshow" isn't bias.

Most things written about Stalin, Ted Bundy, diphtheria, and Celine Dion are also negative. So what's the point?

 

[Rightguide]

Proof of negative reporting on Trump is no proof of unfair reporting on Trump. In fact, it would be unfair if it were positive.

In the absence of evidence, it is. When the only provable collusion between the Russians and an American President occurred under Barack Obama is excused and Trump is accused by the media of being an agent of the Russian government without any tangible evidence whatsoever, it is.

 

[KingOrfeo]

In the absence of evidence, it is. When the only provable collusion between the Russians and an American President occurred under Barack Obama is excused and Trump is accused by the media of being an agent of the Russian government without any tangible evidence whatsoever, it is.

There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence of Trump's ties to the Russian government -- and Russian mobsters -- and in any case, we're not talking about that alone. Everything else about this Admin makes positive reporting on it unfair and usually dishonest.

 

[Rightguide]

There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence of Trump's ties to the Russian government -- and Russian mobsters -- and in any case, we're not talking about that alone. Everything else about this Admin makes positive reporting on it unfair and usually dishonest.

Gratuitous lie. There is no credible circumstantial evidence connecting Trump to the Russian government. Show it to me.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Gratuitous lie. There is no credible circumstantial evidence connecting Trump to the Russian government. Show it to me.

Here. And in this case the evidence is more than circumstantial, it's documented.

Here.

Here.

Here.

 

[Rightguide]

Here. And in this case the evidence is more than circumstantial, it's documented.

Here.

Here.

Here.

All I looked at was number one and it provides zero evidence of Trump collusion with the Russian gov't. Remember you're calling the President an agent of the Russian government,

 

[SyKoKo]

Feinstein: I Haven’t Seen Any Evidence of Collusion Between Trump Campaign and Russians

 

[KingOrfeo]

All I looked at was number one and it provides zero evidence of Trump collusion with the Russian gov't. Remember you're calling the President an agent of the Russian government,

You asked for evidence of his connections with the Russian government, and such evidence exists in plenty. (That documentary is mainly about his connections to Russian oligarchs/mobsters, but in Russia that is usually a distinction without a difference.) Evidence of collusion is what Special Counsel Mueller and the FBI and the Congressional committees are now looking for, as they should, since his connections give rise to reasonable suspicion of collusion.

 

[SyKoKo]

Rep. Maxine Waters said once we're able to "connect the dots" with Russian collusion, Trump will be impeachable. Waters acknowledges there is no evidence yet, however said, "much of what you saw coming out of Trump's mouth was a play from Putin's playbook."

"I think that when you saw him absolutely calling Hillary crooked, the 'lock her up, lock her up,' all of that was developed. I think that was developed strategically with people from the Kremlin, with Putin," Waters said on the Thursday edition of Morning Joe.

 

[SyKoKo]

Its ALL made up

‘Shattered’ Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary’s Loss


From Shattered:

On a phone call with a longtime friend a couple of days after the election, Hillary was much less accepting of her defeat. She put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency: the FBI (Comey), the KGB (the old name for Russia’s intelligence service), and the KKK (the support Trump got from white nationalists).

“I’m angry,” Hillary told her friend. And exhausted. After two brutal campaigns against Sanders and Trump, Hillary now had to explain the failure to friends in a seemingly endless round of phone calls. That was taking a toll on her already weary and grief-stricken soul. But mostly, she was mad— mad that she’d lost and that the country would have to endure a Trump presidency.

The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on “Comey and Russia.”

“She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,” a longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying.

 

[Conager]

All I looked at was number one and it provides zero evidence of Trump collusion with the Russian gov't. Remember you're calling the President an agent of the Russian government,

President Clinton had ties to Russia. He even visited there while a student at Oxford, as did many subsequently outed as Russian spies who also matriculated from that hotbed of Soviet espionage recruitment. Worse, Clinton visited while Putin as an active intelligence officer with the KGB. Coincidence or collusion? We clearly need Mueler to look into it.

 

[SyKoKo]

got 500K for a "speech" there

 

[Lunation]

Pretty much what I would have said. "Reporting on historic shitshow describes Trump presidency as shitshow" isn't bias.

Most things written about Stalin, Ted Bundy, diphtheria, and Celine Dion are also negative. So what's the point?

Hey, hey!

The toxin produced by diptheria has been used as an immunotoxin to help fight lymphoma.

It's completely unfair to link diptheria in with Trump and Celine Dion.

 

[jaF0]

Remember you're calling the President an agent of the Russian government,

Yeah ... and ... ?

Would you prefer Putin's golden shower buddy?

 

[SyKoKo]

Conservative blogger Jim Geraghty, a contributor for National Review and noted #nevertrumper, explained the complete lack of evidence in just two very straightforward paragraphs.

Are any Democratic lawmakers starting to fear that they’re not going to find that evidence? The intelligence community is presumably always watching the Russian government as closely as they can. The FBI counterintelligence guys presumably track Russian agents on our soil as much as possible. You figure the NSA can track just about any electronic communication between Russians and figures in the Trump campaign. If there was something sinister and illegal going on between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, the U.S. government as a whole had every incentive in the world to expose that as quickly as possible. They didn’t expose it before Election Day, they didn’t expose it before the Electoral College voted, they didn’t expose it before Inauguration Day … How many months have the best investigators in the United States been digging into this?

 

[KingOrfeo]

Remember you're calling the President an agent of the Russian government,

And his conduct in office alone would be fair grounds to at least suspect that, without anything else.

 

[Disgustipated]

Vette and miles came back after the 45 was elected. It's going to be hilarious when they leave again BECAUSE of 45.

 

[Sean]

So Vettbigot is trying to claim the Financial fucking Times is engaged in a left wing conspiracy? ROTFLMAO.

 

[Rightguide]

And his conduct in office alone would be fair grounds to at least suspect that, without anything else.

Bullshit.

 

[adrina]

If the shoe fits...

 

[water505]

Rep. Maxine Waters said once we're able to "connect the dots" with Russian collusion, Trump will be impeachable. Waters acknowledges there is no evidence yet, however said, "much of what you saw coming out of Trump's mouth was a play from Putin's playbook."

That ignoramus couldn't solve a two dot puzzle.

 

[Rightguide]

You asked for evidence of his connections with the Russian government, and such evidence exists in plenty. (That documentary is mainly about his connections to Russian oligarchs/mobsters, but in Russia that is usually a distinction without a difference.) Evidence of collusion is what Special Counsel Mueller and the FBI and the Congressional committees are now looking for, as they should, since his connections give rise to reasonable suspicion of collusion.

Bullshit, that political investigation started a year ago by Democrats, to undermine the election with lies and false charges, has yet to expose a single iota of evidence to support your Russian hallucinations vis a vis Donald Trump.