Angelina Jolie's gender?

[LadyFunkenstein]

I thought gender is a social construct???

 

[Pookie]

I thought gender is a social construct???

That's more "gender identity".

 

[Lancecastor]

That's more "gender identity".

Is that like personality defect versus personality disorder?

 

[Pookie]

Is that like personality defect versus personality disorder?

More like what you are versus what you consider yourself to be or identify with.

Think Ken.

 

[Lancecastor]

More like what you are versus what you consider yourself to be or identify with.

Think Ken.

So you can pick your own gender now?

 

[MaryanneB]

SHE HAS A GENETIC MARKER TO PUT HER IN JEOPARDY FOR CANCER, YOU DORK.
Most of you guys can't tell the difference between real and saline so what's the difference????

 

[PayDay]

Okay... So first she has her perfectly good tits chopped off.

No one has any basis of proof for that:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=45181053

Now she's had her ovaries and tubes cut out.

Supposedly. Also: It's her body, women kill babies all the time so what's the big deal if this is potentially nothing of the sort?

What gender is this person now?

I don't like your tone. Leave her alone.

Would "celebrities I don't care about" be considered a gender?

Yes.

I thought gender is a social construct???

That's more "gender identity".

Is that like personality defect versus personality disorder?

More like what you are versus what you consider yourself to be or identify with.

So you can pick your own gender now?

Don't be stupid: Gender =/= Gender Role =/= Genetic Disposition

Gender "identity" means: "I don't wanna be myself but I want to fuck."

Someone either is or isn't themselves. That's it. Done. Over. Genetically a person will always be what they were born as at the chromosomal level. Go back and read ogg's post:
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=66320759&postcount=24

SHE HAS A GENETIC MARKER TO PUT HER IN JEOPARDY FOR CANCER, YOU DORK.

Potentially, supposedly, no one knows, technically. Learn to read.

Most of you guys can't tell the difference between real and saline so what's the difference????

Bold Claim.

 

[Lancecastor]

SHE HAS A GENETIC MARKER TO PUT HER IN JEOPARDY FOR CANCER, YOU DORK.
Most of you guys can't tell the difference between real and saline so what's the difference????

No need to yell, I can hear you just fine.

Jeopardy for cancer....versus having cancer....are two different things entirely.

I think she just hates being a woman, so she is having all her bits chopped off.

Why else would you have your tits removed???

 

[Lunarfaggot]

You have absolutely no way of knowing that.
Testing positive for the genes means, at her age, she most likely already had rogue cells at the very least. Too small to detect maybe. But most probably there nonetheless.

yous an uglay biatch!

 

[Pookie]

So you can pick your own gender now?

Well, not so much "pick". Some people do that though. Again, think Ken ... maybe.

But for most/many it is something they figure out about themselves ... which could be as a kid or adult. They "identify" as female but genetically are male, or vice versa.

 

[Lancecastor]

Well, not so much "pick". Some people do that though. Again, think Ken ... maybe.

But for most/many it is something they figure out about themselves ... which could be as a kid or adult. They "identify" as female but genetically are male, or vice versa.

Do you think Angelina is chopping off his/her female parts because he/she identifies as male ?

Or is it self loathing?

(I think we all agree the "I could get cancer maybe someday" stuff is BS)

 

[Pookie]

Do you think Angelina is chopping off his/her female parts because he/she identifies as male ?

Or is it self loathing?

(I think we all agree the "I could get cancer maybe someday" stuff is BS)

Survival instincts. Overreacting? Maybe. But cancer is some scary shit, especially when there is a family history and you have the genetic markers as well. I would hate to be faced with it.

 

[Lancecastor]

Survival instincts. Overreacting? Maybe. But cancer is some scary shit, especially when there is a family history and you have the genetic markers as well. I would hate to be faced with it.

Fact: She doesn't have cancer and never did.

Shit, the things actresses do nowadays to cover up their plastic surgeries.

 

[doowdniw]

This is only news because of the bits she had removed. If she'd had lymph nodes or moles removed, I doubt that anyone would be commenting.

 

[Lancecastor]

This is only news because of the bits she had removed. If she'd had lymph nodes or moles removed, I doubt that anyone would be commenting.

True....a vaginaectomy is certainly newsworthy.

 

[shwetaCD]

Well I wish Angelina Jolie had an 8 inch black cock! Mmm I would readily be "her" bitch then!

 

[Riles]

I would have expected less invasive preventative measures given all the dough at her disposal.


...then again, maybe she did. I didn't read any article on the matter.

 

[Lancecastor]

Well I wish Angelina Jolie had an 8 inch black cock! Mmm I would readily be "her" bitch then!

Here you go:

http://forum.literotica.com/member.php?u=1481328

 

[shwetaCD]

Here you go:

http://forum.literotica.com/member.php?u=1481328

Who's that?

 

[toubab]

I thought gender is a social construct???

Biological sex isn't. But I think you know that.

 

[dolf]

in her shoes, mine would be gone too. they're just tits, and cancer is a shitty death. I've seen the oozing sores as it eats its way out through a nipple. those genes predict a 45-90% chance of getting breast cancer.

 

[JohnnySavage]

in her shoes, mine would be gone too. they're just tits, and cancer is a shitty death. I've seen the oozing sores as it eats its way out through a nipple. those genes predict a 45-90% chance of getting breast cancer.

No, they predict an increase in the chance of getting cancer. Not a 45-90% chance that you will get it.

 

[Lancecastor]

in her shoes, mine would be gone too. they're just tits, and cancer is a shitty death. I've seen the oozing sores as it eats its way out through a nipple. those genes predict a 45-90% chance of getting breast cancer.

Again....why cut them off before a diagnosis???

 

[dolf]

No, they predict an increase in the chance of getting cancer. Not a 45-90% chance that you will get it.

''Types of faulty genes

The first breast cancer gene faults to be found were BRCA1 and BRCA2. Between 45 and 90 out of every 100 women carrying BRCA genes will get breast cancer at some point in their lives. This means that they have between 45% and 90% lifetime risk of cancer. These genes also increase breast cancer risk in men. ''

Again....why cut them off before a diagnosis???

because by the time they diagnose I already have cancer, I need other treatments alongside the surgery, there's a higher chance i'll lose my nipples and some of the skin, and there's a risk that it's spread. that's after I've spent the last however many years being frequently screened and freaking out and worrying myself sick. having them removed as a precaution would spare me that.

and, again, they're just tits. a couple of skin bags filled with fat & glands. if I get the reconstruction i'll look just the same, so why is it so bad?

 

[Lancecastor]

Would you go for the trifecta?

https://asotechm.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/2-breasts.jpg