Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

[zipman]

If bette-man had to admit he was wrong, would he Blame Obama?

Probably.

The silence of the RWCJ is even better than the silence of the lambs.

Of course the lambs are also smarter.

 

[eyer]

Did this report happen to mention exactly what Chris Stevens was doing in Benghazi that day?

 

[eyer]

Hmmm...

...sounds like crickets in here.

Ok - so you don't like that question...

...how 'bout this one, then:

Did this report mention who Stevens traveled specifically to Benghazi to meet with that day?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Did this report happen to mention exactly what Chris Stevens was doing in Benghazi that day?

He was there to open a school. We already know that.

 

[Que]

He was there to open a school. We already know that.

Good one.

The report no one has read will be released at 5:00 on a Friday. First thing the next Monday after that Obama will click his Bic pen and sign an illegal amnesty by fiat order to start a firestorm.

When excerpts are finally read in context, and other excerpts currently unknown fail to "fully exonerate" the administration or point to further work that needs to be followed up on by the Select Committee, the "Unanimous Report" will suddenly be a partisan hit-piece once again and harmony and order will be restored to the universe.

I like that the Republicans on the Intelligence Committee as well as those on the Select Committee are just letting the Democrats plant their feet and run off at the mouth on the meaning of that report rather than let them turn it into an election year, partition free-for-all. I hope not a word of conclusion on it is spoken till after November. Democrats are going to get killed again without any distraction about the White House having done whatever it is they did.

Edit:

Found one report on this non-story on a conservative opinion site:

Townhall.com: obama-administration-cleared-of-wrongdoing-on-benghazi-says-house-democrats

The way you know it's the right move to wait and see what becomes of this development is watching how MSNBC is treating this event, saying it's "good" for Obama. They're the only ones it seems, but they're doing their job, along with the rest of their ilk, in keeping the liberal Democratic base sedated

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

Does the report comment on the fact that the State Department knew months before the attack that al Qaeda moved into the building adjacent to the consulate, and did nothing? We'll see.

"We will see" is not an acceptable position for you take on this. No one should speculate on Benghazi until all the facts are known...unless it's a Democrat, then of course a snap judgement is called for.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

"we will see."

We've BEEN SEEING.

WE JUST SAW.

DEAL, BITCH.

http://collegetimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/3691545-6518341303-laugh.gif

http://38.media.tumblr.com/07a271f36c2053164866f73410cb1b38/tumblr_mjrph7ul8G1qh2o7zo1_500.gif

http://www.kidsmomo.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/evil-laugh-witch.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/8ea67f25abea2f84a5a34caa144b89be/tumblr_inline_mjbvw6jNoc1qz4rgp.gif

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m79zbiuuzj1qka6b6o1_500.gif

 

[Que]

"we will see."

We've BEEN SEEING.

WE JUST SAW.

DEAL, BITCH.

No one has "seen."

We have "heard" from one Democrat that "there is nothing to see here." Which is exactly what they have been claiming during all the twists and turns of the administrations obfuscations.

They coulda just pointed to a UD post on the subject.

It isn't "news' that a partisan member of the committee says that the information within the report doesn't "prove" the administration did anything wrong.

All of the administration's apologists salivating over an unconfirmed quote doesn't make it more of a story. You can bet each and every one of those leftist nutjobs leaned on every capital hill source they had to get some direct quote from the report itself. Anything at all, and nothing has turned up.

It is what is called getting in front of the news cycle with a trial balloon. Trying to define what the report is about before anything is known about what it actually
written in the report.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

No one has "seen."

We have "heard" from one Democrat that "there is nothing to see here." Which is exactly what they have been claiming during all the twists and turns of the administrations obfuscations.

They coulda just pointed to a UD post on the subject.

It isn't "news' that a partisan member of the committee says that the information within the report doesn't "prove" the administration did anything wrong.

All of the administration's apologists salivating over an unconfirmed quote doesn't make it more of a story. You can bet each and every one of those leftist nutjobs leaned on every capital hill source they had to get some direct quote from the report itself. Anything at all, and nothing has turned up.

It is what is called getting in front of the news cycle with a trial balloon. Trying to define what the report is about before anything is known about what it actually
written in the report.

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--qSoxr9tT--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_320/t46jzjolgbtqt5xplcus.gif

It's over, guy.

Really.

You tried.

We all tried.

We gotta move on, dude.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Isn't it cool when Zumi resorts to his jive turkey street vernacular?

"jive turkey?"

What the fuck, dude? You're a living example of how white people learn about black people through 1970s-era movies, ain'tcha?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

Isn't it cool when Zumi resorts to his jive turkey street vernacular?

is it filled with lots of purple two-dollar words?

 

[Bad_Doggie]

No one has "seen."
<snip>>>>>

It is what is called getting in front of the news cycle with a trial balloon. Trying to define what the report is about before anything is known about what it actually
written in the report.

Kinda like screaming, daily…….”where’s the outrage, scandal, Impeach etc etc”

That kinda “defining” (manufacturing) you mean, huh?

Woof!

 

[about_average]

Did this report happen to mention exactly what Chris Stevens was doing in Benghazi that day?

According to his diary, he was there being a diplomat, something ambassadors commonly do.

 

[Disgustipated]

Isn't it cool when Zumi resorts to his jive turkey street vernacular?

Did you call it jive turkey when you thought he was Asian?

No, you racist fuck.

 

[snugglestruggle]

Did you call it jive turkey when you thought he was Asian?

No, you racist fuck.

Jive Turkey? Did I just walk into an episode of Good Times?

 

[Disgustipated]

Jive Turkey? Did I just walk into an episode of Good Times?

*temporary layoffs!*

 

[snugglestruggle]

*temporary layoffs!*

*Good Times*

 

[BoyNextDoor]

"We will see" is not an acceptable position for you take on this. No one should speculate on Benghazi until all the facts are known...unless it's a Democrat, then of course a snap judgement is called for.

All of the facts are known. They have been for a very long time.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

Kinda like screaming, daily…….”where’s the outrage, scandal, Impeach etc etc”

That kinda “defining” (manufacturing) you mean, huh?

Woof!

Nope...nothing at all like that. next door.

@ BoyNext Door:

Really? Cause I have a list of about 15 questions about Benghazi that I still do not know the answers to.

You have ALL of the answers, do you?

Riddle me this:

Who approved the transfer of Libyan Weapons to the Syrians?

 

[Disgustipated]

I could have, it has no racial connotation, you racist pussy.


Urban Dictionary:
1.

jive turkey
a. One who speaks as though they know what they're talking about...though they do not. b. a bullshitter.

Common sense dictionary:

A. It's a racist term and vettbirther would never use it to a white person.