Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

Riddle me this:

Who approved the transfer of Libyan Weapons to the Syrians?

You mean "the Syrian" jihadi rebels, right?

'cause Syria itself has all the weapons they need from Russia.
 
Nope...nothing at all like that. next door.

@ BoyNext Door:

Really? Cause I have a list of about 15 questions about Benghazi that I still do not know the answers to.

You have ALL of the answers, do you?

Riddle me this:

Who approved the transfer of Libyan Weapons to the Syrians?

You seem to have a zillion separate and unrealted questions about Libya and Benghazi. That's fine. Can we adress them as separate issues so that we can put the debunked bullshit to rest?
 
Not so, it might have been coined by a black American but it could apply to anyone with the characterizations I already posted, you fucked up racist little turd.

You have never used it before. Only to a black person. You're having a bad few weeks. Time for a long break.
 
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jive turkey
Jive Turkey was a derogatory slang word in African American Vernacular English (Ebonics), used to refer to someone who was unreliable, made empty promises, or who was full of bluster. Several funk groups in the late 1960s and 1970s used the term, particularly the Ohio Players in songs such as "Jive Turkey" on the album Skin Tight from 1974. The insult became widely known in the 1980s, particularly via television comedies (e.g., The Jeffersons). The term has been used by later television characters (e.g., Homer Simpson) in order to demonstrate that they are out of touch with modern youth trends, culture, and language. The term was also used in the film Semi-Pro starring Will Ferrell and in Weird Science starring Kelly LeBrock 1985. "Jive turkey" also garnered attention in the movie Trading Places. Jive turkey, however, was already falling into disuse when it was spoken by "hip" television characters in the 1970s, such as George Jefferson.
 
Nope...nothing at all like that. next door.

@ BoyNext Door:

Really? Cause I have a list of about 15 questions about Benghazi that I still do not know the answers to.

You have ALL of the answers, do you?

Riddle me this:

Who approved the transfer of Libyan Weapons to the Syrians?

What? Screaming daily prior to the election, during it and since ”where’s the outrage, scandal, Impeach etc etc” without any solid evidence or a report of the evidence was not…….

It is what is called getting in front of the news cycle with a trial balloon. Trying to define what the report is about before anything is known about what it actually written in the report.

an attempt to influence the election, let alone the report?

<snip> No one should speculate on Benghazi until all the facts are known...unless it's a Democrat, then of course a snap judgement is called for.

Errrr well yeah…… unless it's a Republican (RW media), then of course a snap judgement is called for!

Having questions is fine, but, that’s not what was being done, was it?

Woof!
 
Based on what is known, Obama and his minions were faced with an election and decided no last-minute terrorist attack could be allowed to derail the campaign narrative. So Obama, Hillary, and Rice lied.

What, precisely, were Obama's actions on Sept 11, 2012 before he left the following morning to a fundraiser in Vegas?

Was the fairy tale about Benghazi made up to further the campaign narrative that Obama's authorization of the killing of bin Laden had quelled terrorism? Obama said, over and over, that terrorism was "on the run" and GM had been saved.

Four people died in Benghazi, and that is four more than in Watergate. In both cases, there were lies at the very highest level of government.

The difference is that, thankfully, the Washington Post went after Nixon and got him to resign in 1974 under threat of impeachment. Today, the Post is resting on its laurels and has no interest in any scandal involving Benghazi because it shares Obama's intrinsic ideology.
 
Not so, it might have been coined by a black American but it could apply to anyone with the characterizations I already posted, you fucked up racist little turd.




I love how rob, ud, and the other fucked up obama terrorist supporters forget that obama and hillary sat on their asses eating popcorn while American's died due to their fucked up non existent leadership
 
Based on what is known, Obama and his minions were faced with an election and decided no last-minute terrorist attack could be allowed to derail the campaign narrative. So Obama, Hillary, and Rice lied.

What, precisely, were Obama's actions on Sept 11, 2012 before he left the following morning to a fundraiser in Vegas?

Was the fairy tale about Benghazi made up to further the campaign narrative that Obama's authorization of the killing of bin Laden had quelled terrorism? Obama said, over and over, that terrorism was "on the run" and GM had been saved.

Four people died in Benghazi, and that is four more than in Watergate. In both cases, there were lies at the very highest level of government.

The difference is that, thankfully, the Washington Post went after Nixon and got him to resign in 1974 under threat of impeachment. Today, the Post is resting on its laurels and has no interest in any scandal involving Benghazi because it shares Obama's intrinsic ideology.

https://warosu.org/data/vr/img/0014/04/1392556844269.gif

http://www.faniq.com/images/blog/pointing-and-laughing.gif

Suffer.
 
Based on what is known, Obama and his minions were faced with an election and decided no last-minute terrorist attack could be allowed to derail the campaign narrative. So Obama, Hillary, and Rice lied.

What, precisely, were Obama's actions on Sept 11, 2012 before he left the following morning to a fundraiser in Vegas?

Was the fairy tale about Benghazi made up to further the campaign narrative that Obama's authorization of the killing of bin Laden had quelled terrorism? Obama said, over and over, that terrorism was "on the run" and GM had been saved.

Four people died in Benghazi, and that is four more than in Watergate. In both cases, there were lies at the very highest level of government.

The difference is that, thankfully, the Washington Post went after Nixon and got him to resign in 1974 under threat of impeachment. Today, the Post is resting on its laurels and has no interest in any scandal involving Benghazi because it shares Obama's intrinsic ideology.
Please spell the lies out for us. Where are the quotes for these lies?
 
You seem to have a zillion separate and unrealted questions about Libya and Benghazi. That's fine. Can we adress them as separate issues so that we can put the debunked bullshit to rest?

No. That is the whole point. The administration wants to break up the whole sorry mess into little sound-byte manageable pieces.
 
What? Screaming daily prior to the election, during it and since ”where’s the outrage, scandal, Impeach etc etc” without any solid evidence or a report of the evidence was not…….



an attempt to influence the election, let alone the report?



Errrr well yeah…… unless it's a Republican (RW media), then of course a snap judgement is called for!

Having questions is fine, but, that’s not what was being done, was it?

Woof!

Yeah that's rich the whole POINT to the false narrative was to influence the 2012 election...NOW you wanna bitch about when those chickens come home to roost?
 
Yeah that's rich the whole POINT to the false narrative was to influence the 2012 election...NOW you wanna bitch about when those chickens come home to roost?

It's pretty clear that the "false narrative" was a desperate attempt by republicans to try and damage Obama during the reelection.

Honestly, it was pathetic.
 
It's pretty clear that the "false narrative" was a desperate attempt by republicans to try and damage Obama during the reelection.

Honestly, it was pathetic.

:rolleyes:

Yours is a scurrilious accusation. They had no need to do that when all they had to do was simply point out that he was not a citizen and that he had a forged birth certificate.
 
:rolleyes:

Yours is a scurrilious accusation. They had no need to do that when all they had to do was simply point out that he was not a citizen and that he had a forged birth certificate.

I lived up t my word

You havent
 
I can't help it if you don't like the fact that by crying wolf so many times, the Republican Party validated Zip's point.

you know

and I know

and you know that I know that you know

Jew KILLER Zip's point wasn't valid one whit
 
No. That is the whole point. The administration wants to break up the whole sorry mess into little sound-byte manageable pieces.

Well, if you insist on all or nothing, you'll keep getting the latter.
 
Back
Top