Crimes of Passion

It's funny how nervous everyone gets about the Twitter thing. I have to assume they just don't know what it is or how to use it. There is no single "feed" that some secret group of people belong to. It's not like some old AOL chatroom. Of the people in this thread--those defending Reci, those in the middle, and those "attacking"--are all people in my feed. That's a pretty weak conspiracy...
 
With all due respect, what does that have to do with anything being said?

This is why I posted the Jerry Springer pics before. Because people come to the thread and see that some people are arguing with other people. And rather than taking the time to see what they're arguing about, they say, "Oh, I really like Reci, so I'll take her side," or "Oh, I don't like Reci, so I'll take the other side," or "CHNOPS is an asshole so I'll take the opposite side from him" or "Someone on the forum picked on me once, so I'll take this side." And it's all reactionary and illogical and boring and stupid. And this is why these threads turn to shit in 5 pages - because no one knows what the fuck is going on.

This is true on every drama thread in the history of drama threads.

If people would actually read threads and make decisions based on what they read, things would be different. But if that were how people functioned, political threads would be better too.

And that's my last word on this clusterfuck.

Wait, you don't have anything to say about Pete (and me by extension) holding you down and wanting to assfuck you? :eek:
 
think she's just kinda smilin' in a knowin' kinda way over that :cool:

:D

Also (no really, last post, for real this time, really) even though I used VA's post as a jump-off point, it wasn't a dig at him at all. It was a comment on something I see happening. :rose:
 
With all due respect, what does that have to do with anything being said?

This is why I posted the Jerry Springer pics before. Because people come to the thread and see that some people are arguing with other people. And rather than taking the time to see what they're arguing about, they say, "Oh, I really like Reci, so I'll take her side," or "Oh, I don't like Reci, so I'll take the other side," or "CHNOPS is an asshole so I'll take the opposite side from him" or "Someone on the forum picked on me once, so I'll take this side." And it's all reactionary and illogical and boring and stupid. And this is why these threads turn to shit in 5 pages - because no one knows what the fuck is going on.

This is true on every drama thread in the history of drama threads.

If people would actually read threads and make decisions based on what they read, things would be different. But if that were how people functioned, political threads would be better too.

And that's my last word on this clusterfuck.

So pointing out that two of lits biggest liars continue to lie throughout this thread is irrelevant to this thread? Or maybe you think adding their own interpretation while spinning her words is not lying? Ok.

None of that is nearly as weird as suggesting I may be trying to protect Rec or UD....
 
So pointing out that two of lits biggest liars continue to lie throughout this thread is irrelevant to this thread? Or maybe you think adding their own interpretation while spinning her words is not lying? Ok.

None of that is nearly as weird as suggesting I may be trying to protect Rec or UD....

Yes, because you've always agreed with us so much :D
 
Also (no really, last post, for real this time, really)
Dispewse them? But I haven't adwessed them, yet!

My adwess is one of the high points of the Passovew! My fwiend Biggus Diccus has come aww the way fwom Wome just to heaw it!
 
So pointing out that two of lits biggest liars continue to lie throughout this thread is irrelevant to this thread? Or maybe you think adding their own interpretation while spinning her words is not lying? Ok.

None of that is nearly as weird as suggesting I may be trying to protect Rec or UD....

Suppose CHNOPS and Sean are both huge amazing asshole liars.

What does that have to do with the rest of the thread?

Sometimes people I can't stand make very good points.

Sometimes people I like and respect a great deal are dead wrong.

If your argument is "CHNOPS and Sean are liars and they're on Side B so I'll take Side A" - well, again, with all due respect, IMO that's not a good reason to take a side. Neither is "I don't like Reci's posts so I'll bag on her", or "Her husband and I argued about politics once so I'm going to call her a pedo" or "My friends don't like her so I'm going to post she's a criminal", etc.

I've no dog in this fight. If you wanna argue with Sean and CHNOPS and whoever, I couldn't care less. But the possible assholery of CHNOPS and Sean are not the topic at hand. It's a non sequitur. It's like popping into the thread and saying, "Yeah, but Obama's an asshole". That's my point.
 
This thread needs Cliff notes. I'm totally fucking lost. I'm open for pms from anyone who wants to educate this dumb-ass n00b.
 
Suppose CHNOPS and Sean are both huge amazing asshole liars.

What does that have to do with the rest of the thread?

Sometimes people I can't stand make very good points.

Sometimes people I like and respect a great deal are dead wrong.

If your argument is "CHNOPS and Sean are liars and they're on Side B so I'll take Side A" - well, again, with all due respect, IMO that's not a good reason to take a side. Neither is "I don't like Reci's posts so I'll bag on her", or "Her husband and I argued about politics once so I'm going to call her a pedo" or "My friends don't like her so I'm going to post she's a criminal", etc.

I've no dog in this fight. If you wanna argue with Sean and CHNOPS and whoever, I couldn't care less. But the possible assholery of CHNOPS and Sean are not the topic at hand. It's a non sequitur. It's like popping into the thread and saying, "Yeah, but Obama's an asshole". That's my point.

I see and understand your point and agree. Many people here do not know why they are wielding pitch forks and torches.

But I still maintain that pointing out it would be stupid to belive anything those idiots post on the subject is indeed relevant.
If I where to suggest we should not believe Chnops because he cybered with KRC, that would be irrelevant.
 
I see and understand your point and agree. Many people here do not know why they are wielding pitch forks and torches.

But I still maintain that pointing out it would be stupid to belive anything those idiots post on the subject is indeed relevant.
If I where to suggest we should not believe Chnops because he cybered with KRC, that would be irrelevant.

And yet you've never been able to actually point to one of my "lies". Just because you don't like what I say about your impotent old man doesn't make me a liar.
 
With all due respect, what does that have to do with anything being said?

This is why I posted the Jerry Springer pics before. Because people come to the thread and see that some people are arguing with other people. And rather than taking the time to see what they're arguing about, they say, "Oh, I really like Reci, so I'll take her side," or "Oh, I don't like Reci, so I'll take the other side," or "CHNOPS is an asshole so I'll take the opposite side from him" or "Someone on the forum picked on me once, so I'll take this side." And it's all reactionary and illogical and boring and stupid. And this is why these threads turn to shit in 5 pages - because no one knows what the fuck is going on.

This is true on every drama thread in the history of drama threads.

If people would actually read threads and make decisions based on what they read, things would be different. But if that were how people functioned, political threads would be better too.

And that's my last word on this clusterfuck.

Pussy!
 
Back
Top