The "Why I know Obama will be Relected" Thread

pornstarwannabe

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Posts
5,084
Single issues only, please. What is the single most important reason, in your view, that will lead to Obama's re-election? The issue can be a "pro" for Obama, or a "con" for Romney.

As I see it, Obama's charisma is the only potential reason that I can see for his re-election.

What's yours?
 
the brush fire that is Bain and the tax returns will turn into a forest fire and burn Romney's chances.
 
As I see it, Obama's charisma is the only potential reason that I can see for his re-election...

WHAT "CHARISMA"??? That boring, creepy monotone in a flat midwestern snooze accent???

It boggles my mind when people call that individual "a great orator" or "charismatic." I don't think they have ever even listened to him with an open mind. They see a half-black dude and assume that he'll be a "great orator" because historically alot of black politicians have been good orators. He's not even black. He's half white, was raised by whites, and doesn't even sound like he's black. He sounds like he just wandered in off the farm from the cornbelt. He is NOT "cool" at all. He's a boring, midwestern dweebie white guy who sounds like he's trying to be a cult leader by talking in a slow deliberate monotone.
 
WHAT "CHARISMA"??? That boring, creepy monotone in a flat midwestern snooze accent???

Obama + teleprompter = charismatic speech.

Obama - teleprompter = on-his-feet thinking that can be horrendous. Like stuttering, "share the wealth" remark, "the private sector is doing fine" line, "you did not build that" line, the "I'll keep my foot on the throat of BP" line, etc.

I still think his charisma is his only weapon to win. he can bash Romney all day long. When voters go into their polling place, they'll have to decide of 4 more years of Obama vs. taking a chance on a new guy. People do not ordinarily vote for someone they do not like.
 
No one was able to post a single positive achievement by Zero? Maybe because he hasn't made any.
 
If you think Obama is dependent on a teleprompter, you might want to review some of the debates he had with McCain.

Debates. Romney against Obama should be a treat for the ears.
 
If you think Obama is dependent on a teleprompter, you might want to review some of the debates he had with McCain.

Debates. Romney against Obama should be a treat for the ears.

I think it will be pretty boring. They'll just agree on everything. It'll be like watching a debate between blobfish and klingle.
 
I know why there should be a "None of the above" option on the ballot.
Also, I know why an elected official should be barred from seeking re-election when they already occupy an elected position.

I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
 
I know why there should be a "None of the above" option on the ballot.
Also, I know why an elected official should be barred from seeking re-election when they already occupy an elected position.

I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Cheers!
 
If you think Obama is dependent on a teleprompter, you might want to review some of the debates he had with McCain.

Debates. Romney against Obama should be a treat for the ears.

I agree. McCain was a horrible debater.

are the debates the "single issue" that, in your view, will lead to his re-election?
 
Because the electorate is too stupid to recognize a lying sack of shit even when it lying on their front porch in a burning brown paper bag.
 
Because the sensible American public has witnessed the vitriol of the right fringe re: Obama, and they recognise jaded and inflexible thinking when they see it.

When Obama wins, it won't be because he won. It'll be because of folks like the regulars in this forum, and their "we're the alternative" messaging.

(And no, they won't take responsibility. Which will make the win even sweeter.) :cool:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top