You would think throwing away 35 billion would piss people off...

VaticanAssassin

God Mod
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Posts
12,391
But my guess is most will make excuses or deflect blame......Let the spin begin!!!


http://news.investors.com/article/616849/201207030826/gm-bailout-taxpayer-lossTo quote Lando Calrissian, this deal's getting worse all the time.

General Motors(GM) shares fell to a fresh 2012 closing low of 19.57 on Monday. The stock hit 19 in mid-December, the lowest since the auto giant came public at $33 in November 2010 following its June 2009 bankruptcy.

Normally you might say, tough luck investors. But this is Government Motors. The Treasury still owns 26.5% of GM, or 500 million shares. Taxpayers are still out $26.4 billion in direct aid. Shares would have to hit $53 for the government to break even.

Those shares were worth about $9.8 billion as of Monday. That would leave taxpayers with a loss of $16.6 billion.


But that's not the full tally. Obama let GM keep $45 billion in past losses to offset future profits. Those are usually wiped out or slashed, along with debts, in bankruptcy. But the administration essentially gifted $45 billion in write-offs (book value $18 billion) to GM. So when GM earned a $7.6 billion profit in 2011 (more on that below), it paid no taxes.


Include that $18 billion gift, and taxpayers' true loss climbs to nearly $35 billion.

Of course, there's no chance that the Obama administration will sell off its GM stake before Election Day. That would force Obama to recognize actual losses, which would remind voters that the bailout was a massive transfer from taxpayers to unions.

Union workers did make sacrifices in bankruptcy, but not nearly enough. GM only narrowed the labor cost gap vs. what Japanese automakers pay their workers. Given that Toyota(TM) still enjoys a price premium over similar GM vehicles, the U.S. auto giant needs a labor cost advantage, not near-parity. And Toyota has relatively high costs. Volkswagen(VLKAY) pays workers at its new Tennessee plant only about half what GM does.

The Volt hybrid was supposed to provide a green veneer to GM's entire lineup, like the Prius has done for Toyota. Instead, the Volt has been a p.r. disaster following fires and anemic sales that led to a temporary production halt earlier this year.

GM's market share and profits got an artificial boost in 2011 as Japan's earthquake and Thailand's massive floods wrecked havoc with supply chains for Toyota and other Japanese automakers. But with Toyota back on track and VW and Hyundai aggressively expanding in America, GM is rapidly losing share in 2012.

Overall U.S. auto sales were strong to start the year, but that momentum has faded along with slowing economic growth and hiring. Falling gas prices also may reduce the incentive to replace aging cars and trucks with higher-mileage vehicles. Automakers release U.S. June vehicle sales on Tuesday.
 
It's already spun. You posted an editorial. That you regard it as some kind of fact is cute but dumb.

You fucked up the link, so I clicked through to their editorial page to try and find it. I couldn't, but the list of other editorials makes your "I'm just asking questions" approach seem kind of, shall we say, disingenuous.

http://news.investors.com/ibdeditorials.aspx
 
It's obvious...Toyota and volkswagen workers have to strike to get equal wages with GM workers...they are being ripped off
 

If you were my wife we would watch an hour of MSNBC together every night. Then we would argue for 30 minutes before fucking for an hour. On nights were I lost the argument I would have to redeem myself by ending the sex by giving you a facial......
 
It's already spun. You posted an editorial. That you regard it as some kind of fact is cute but dumb.

You fucked up the link, so I clicked through to their editorial page to try and find it. I couldn't, but the list of other editorials makes your "I'm just asking questions" approach seem kind of, shall we say, disingenuous.

http://news.investors.com/ibdeditorials.aspx

Numbers are sometimes numbers. Dumb and disingenuous but not even the slightest attempt to refute the numbers? Nothing even pithy or funny? Just name calling? I can stand you BS when you throw in some pith...

Weak...........
 
Numbers are sometimes numbers. Dumb and disingenuous but not even the slightest attempt to refute the numbers? Nothing even pithy or funny? Just name calling? I can stand you BS when you throw in some pith...

Weak...........
Dumb and disingenuous, and therefore not the slightest attempt. No one owes you a response just because you ask for one. If you'd chosen your cut and paste better, I or someone else might have responded. If you'd trod some territory that hasn't been trod 1,266,444 times before, I or someone else might have responded. Instead, you got well-deserved lack of interest and a bit of very mild ridicule. I'd count myself lucky that you got off as easy as you did.
 
Dumb and disingenuous, and therefore not the slightest attempt. No one owes you a response just because you ask for one. If you'd chosen your cut and paste better, I or someone else might have responded. If you'd trod some territory that hasn't been trod 1,266,444 times before, I or someone else might have responded. Instead, you got well-deserved lack of interest and a bit of very mild ridicule. I'd count myself lucky that you got off as easy as you did.

You use a made up number 1,266,444 to try to make a point, while discounting a real number like 35 billion to better fit in you box of party line tranquility and then suggest I need to go count something? :rolleyes: While calling me
disingenuous?


I can only hope that was an attempt at pith....... :cool:
 
If you were my wife we would watch an hour of MSNBC together every night. Then we would argue for 30 minutes before fucking for an hour. On nights were I lost the argument I would have to redeem myself by ending the sex by giving you a facial......


I dont watch 24 hour news networks.

It rots the brain ;)
 
Back
Top