After GAY "Marriage"....Are Islamic Polygamous Marriages Next?

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
As the euphoria over homosexual marriages spread through the “gaymunity,” critics of the biologically insane relationship are predicting that polygamy will be up next on the marriage docket. Supporters of homosexual marriage blabbered on how President Obama’s decision to come out in favor of homosexual marriage put him “on the right side of history.” Here’s what Shepherd Smith of Fox news said about Obama’s “historical” announcement:

“Republicans on the wrong side of history — our country has finally hit the 21st century.”

I’m not sure what side of history Smith is talking about since there is no history of homosexual marriage in any century. In reality, support for homosexual marriage puts a person on the wrong side of history, reason, biology, and morality.

There is, however, a long history of multiple marriage — polygamy. When presidential candidate Rick Santorum compared homosexual marriage to polygamy, he was jeered. But what argument can be used against polygamy if “love” and “consent” are the operating standards for marriage in the 21st century? As the Cole Porter song says, “Anything Goes.”







While most Americans will most likely not pursue polygamy, Muslims will. Consider the following by David J. Rusin:

Islam sanctions polygamy — more specifically, polygyny — allowing Muslim men to keep up to four wives at once. Though marrying a second woman while remaining married to the first is prohibited across the Western world, including all 50 U.S. states, a Muslim can circumvent the law by wedding one woman in a government-recognized marriage and joining with others in unlicensed religious unions devoid of legal standing.

As Muslims have grown more numerous in the West, so too have Muslim polygamists. France, home to the largest Islamic population in Western Europe, was estimated in 2006 to host 16,000 to 20,000 polygamous families — almost all Muslim — containing 180,000 total people, including children. In the United States, such Muslims may have already reached numerical parity with their fundamentalist-Mormon counterparts; as many as 100,000 Muslims reside in multi-wife families, and the phenomenon has gained particular traction among black Muslims.

Most Muslim women do not work. How will these polygamist families with multiple children be supported? How will the children be educated? Concentrations of Muslims in specific geographical areas will overwhelm the educational and welfare infrastructure of cities. In time, Islam will dominate, drive out competing ideologies, and change the political landscape.
 
Who cares? Don't wan't to practice polygamy? Don't....but that doesn't give the government the right to tell you me or anyone else that they can't.
 
Last edited:
Who cares? Don't wan't to practice polygamy? Don't....but that doesn't give the government the right to tell you me or anyone else that they can't.

point is

already we see positions taken that pedophelia is INTERGENERATIONAL LOVE

why GAY MARRIAGE and NOT POLOGAMY and then WHY NOT PEDOPHELIA ETC ETC

why not have KIDS marrying KIDS

WHY HAVE ANY STANDARDS AND MORALS AT ALL:confused:
 
There is a trend away from morality; you know, acknowledging something is absolutely right or wrong. Moral people are branded bigots or haters. Morality has become relative and personal. Of course, there can be no moral objection to polygamy. Standards will continue to deteriorate. Throughout history, this is a hallmark of a dying society.
 
actually there is NO REASON why marriage is between ONE and ONE

why not one and 2-3 or more?
 
point is

already we see positions taken that pedophelia is INTERGENERATIONAL LOVE

why GAY MARRIAGE and NOT POLOGAMY and then WHY NOT PEDOPHELIA ETC ETC

why not have KIDS marrying KIDS

WHY HAVE ANY STANDARDS AND MORALS AT ALL:confused:


You just jumped from the actions of consenting adults to pedophilia with zero connection. If someone is molesting kids, it's because they are a pedophile not because they have more than one spouse, or they have a spouse of the same sex.

Once again...you can't have the government dictating and enforcing morality, that's tyrannical commie bullshit. If you are a proponent of freedom, and liberty live and let live as long as no one is being harmed or violated is the only real way to approach these social issues.
 
There is a trend away from morality; you know, acknowledging something is absolutely right or wrong. Moral people are branded bigots or haters. Morality has become relative and personal. Of course, there can be no moral objection to polygamy. Standards will continue to deteriorate. Throughout history, this is a hallmark of a dying society.

Many hide bigotry and hate behind "morality" and religion.
 
You just jumped from the actions of consenting adults to pedophilia with zero connection. If someone is molesting kids, it's because they are a pedophile not because they have more than one spouse, or they have a spouse of the same sex.

Once again...you can't have the government dictating and enforcing morality, that's tyrannical commie bullshit. If you are a proponent of freedom, and liberty live and let live as long as no one is being harmed or violated is the only real way to approach these social issues.

at one time

gays were seen as deviants

there is a movement afoot to normalize ADULT child relationships

what i am saying is

HOW LONG BEFORE WE REACH THAT STAGE AND WHY SHOULDNT THEY HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS BETWEEN A OLDER PERSON AND A WILLING YOUNGER ONE?
 
at one time

gays were seen as deviants

there is a movement afoot to normalize ADULT child relationships

what i am saying is

HOW LONG BEFORE WE REACH THAT STAGE ANDWHY SHOULDNT THEY HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS BETWEEN A OLDER PERSON AND A WILLING YOUNGER ONE?

Retardation would certainly explain a lot you know.
 
Many hide bigotry and hate behind "morality" and religion.

Very true. But what about me? I believe homosexuality is a violation of natural law and, therefore,immoral. Yet I have absolutely no negative feelings for gay people. They deserve the same rights and responsibilities as any citizen. If necessary, I think they should have civil unions, and if that is not good enough, I think the government should not recognize any marriage and change everything to civil unions. My wife and I are participating in God's covenant of marriage spiritually through our church.
My relationship with the gay community is very positive. I just treat everyone the same. I've helped many gay people afflicted with HIV and other problems without a second thought. I have been labeled a hater. It is hurtful, and I don't think it's true.
 
at one time

gays were seen as deviants

there is a movement afoot to normalize ADULT child relationships

what i am saying is

HOW LONG BEFORE WE REACH THAT STAGE AND WHY SHOULDNT THEY HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS BETWEEN A OLDER PERSON AND A WILLING YOUNGER ONE?


Irrelevant speculation.

Laws regarding the care and safety of children are not the same as laws that regulate/prohibit social activities between consenting adults and here is why.

Children are unable to make decisions for themselves, the laws are there to protect those unable to protect themselves (kids). It's a legitimate safety and welfare issue that we make sure these helpless citizens are not abused or neglected along with the elderly/disabled etc.

Adults are able to make decisions for themselves and they bear the responsibility for their decisions. Laws prohibiting or regulating the social activities of consenting adult's protects no one. There is no helpless person being violated, there is no victim. The only thing laws like this accomplish is the pissing off of the people it regulates because it infringes upon their right to life, liberty and their pursuit of happiness.
 
Very true. But what about me? I believe homosexuality is a violation of natural law and, therefore,immoral. Yet I have absolutely no negative feelings for gay people. They deserve the same rights and responsibilities as any citizen. If necessary, I think they should have civil unions, and if that is not good enough, I think the government should not recognize any marriage and change everything to civil unions. My wife and I are participating in God's covenant of marriage spiritually through our church.
My relationship with the gay community is very positive. I just treat everyone the same. I've helped many gay people afflicted with HIV and other problems without a second thought. I have been labeled a hater. It is hurtful, and I don't think it's true.

I cam't seem to care about your problem. Sorry.
 
for now

50 yrs ago

you would have said the same about GAY MARRIAGE

Really? How do you know? Regardless, in either case it's irrelevant speculation.

Protecting the innocent and helpless is a legit reason to write a law.

Dictation of arbitrary morals through legislation in an allegedly free society is not.

Unless you are a fan of big government micromanaging everything? That sounds like liberal hippie bull shit doesn't it? are you a closet lib B B?

If not how can you advocate big government regulation over the social interactions of consenting adults?
 
Really? How do you know? Regardless, in either case it's irrelevant speculation.

Protecting the innocent and helpless is a legit reason to write a law.

Dictation of arbitrary morals through legislation in an allegedly free society is not.

Unless you are a fan of big government micromanaging everything? That sounds like liberal hippie bull shit doesn't it? are you a closet lib B B?

If not how can you advocate big government regulation over the social interactions of consenting adults?

really?

how about 15 yr old, helpless?



YOU KNOW WHERE THIS STUFF LEADS TO
 
Back
Top