Isn't it time men started rejecting Beta females?

You do understand the difference between fantasy and reality, right?

You never engaged in dirty talk with a woman? of course not...and that's totally ok! Like I said in the post that was put up before, there are a number of women that get off on dirty talk and I was using that fact to demonstrate that a term dose not determine if you are sexist. Your attitude to the opposite gender determines that, and your true self shows just like his post did.

It isn't the money that attracts women to men of these professions. It's the muscle, the image of him being her protector.

why do you think I pointed out that firefighter's/cops/military don't make shit. Sure they eat well and have some perks and that deff helps but I would safely say 35-60k a year is pretty FAR from being panty wetting rich.
 
Last edited:
Edit: I sense that you're not getting the point here. I didn't go to enthusiast clubs except to prove to doubting thomases like yourself that there are no such thing as young women geeks. I sure as hell did not go there looking for a date.

So you only went to these 'enthusiast clubs' to prove to other people that women didn't exist there.

What you're saying makes absolutely no sense.



I have plenty of experience with dating. What you keep not understanding is that I didn't waste time trying to date women that did not exist.

I spent my time dating women that existed.

And the women that existed were all horrible, according to you. Why is it that others don't feel the same as you do? I mean if you're SO sure of these supposed 'facts', why do so many people have different (ie; successful) experiences with women aged 18-30?

As long as women complain, I will take that right to complain right back. I will take it by force if I have to.

You will take what "by force"?
:confused:
 
You never engaged in dirty talk with a woman? of course not...and that's totally ok! Like I said in the post that was put up before, there are a number of women that get off on dirty talk and I was using that fact to demonstrate that a term dose not determine if you are sexist. Your attitude to the opposite gender determines that, and your true self shows just like his post did.

There are women get off on dirty talk?

You don't say!?!?!
:rolleyes:

Dirty talk of the nature that you were writing about is based in fantasy. That's what my reply was referring to.
 
I am a self-sufficient, intelligent female that does not expect a man to "look after me" or put me on a pedestal so I can sit there eating bonbons. If there is a situation requiring action I'm just as likely to get in the middle of it...I certainly don't sit back and let someone else do the dirty work.

I do not take crap from people, and when I want something I go after it. I take care of pretty much everything around the house in addition to a job....essentially doing "women's work" and "men's work" if there must be a division.

I married a geek...a computer-building, Carl Sagan-loving, string theory reading, shy with women, only slept with one other before me geek.

Whatever the original OP's issue is with women, you can't pigeon-hole an entire population into 2 groups.....
 
So you only went to these 'enthusiast clubs' to prove to other people that women didn't exist there.
To show that you ain't gonna find GEEK women in that age group. Please... keep up.

And the women that existed were all horrible, according to you. Why is it that others don't feel the same as you do? I mean if you're SO sure of these supposed 'facts', why do so many people have different (ie; successful) experiences with women aged 18-30?
I had plenty of successful experiences with women. I just left the geek lifestyle behind to do it. As would anyone ELSE who really had any good experiences with women of that age group.

I'm not even sure here if you're reading what I'm writing. You've got it all twisted around to say you can never have any good experiences with women in that age group. You can, if you are willing to adapt. If you are a geek you will need to stow that shit when dealing with younger women, though.

You will take what "by force"?
:confused:
Don't see what's confusing you. You and everyone else here have waged an endless effort to coddle women who complain about men and silence men who complain right back. You haven't learned yet that I am utterly impervious to any kind of intimidation or bullying. After 7+ years you haven't figured that out yet.
 
I am a self-sufficient, intelligent female that does not expect a man to "look after me" or put me on a pedestal so I can sit there eating bonbons. If there is a situation requiring action I'm just as likely to get in the middle of it...I certainly don't sit back and let someone else do the dirty work.

I do not take crap from people, and when I want something I go after it. I take care of pretty much everything around the house in addition to a job....essentially doing "women's work" and "men's work" if there must be a division.

I married a geek...a computer-building, Carl Sagan-loving, string theory reading, shy with women, only slept with one other before me geek.

Whatever the original OP's issue is with women, you can't pigeon-hole an entire population into 2 groups.....
That's you. If most women were like you society wouldn't be so fucked up.
 
To show that you ain't gonna find GEEK women in that age group. Please... keep up.

That's why you went to these "enthusiast groups"?

Again, it makes absolutely no sense.

I had plenty of successful experiences with women. I just left the geek lifestyle behind to do it. As would anyone ELSE who really had any good experiences with women of that age group.

Again, I know over a dozen women who are my personal friends who show your premise to be false.


I'm not even sure here if you're reading what I'm writing. You've got it all twisted around to say you can never have any good experiences with women in that age group. You can, if you are willing to adapt. If you are a geek you will need to stow that shit when dealing with younger women, though.

What that should read, is that YOU didn't have good personal experiences with women (geek or otherwise) until you met your wife. This has to do with you, not with women.

Don't see what's confusing you. You and everyone else here have waged an endless effort to coddle women who complain about men and silence men who complain right back. You haven't learned yet that I am utterly impervious to any kind of intimidation or bullying. After 7+ years you haven't figured that out yet.

What are you going to force them to do? Your statement isn't clear. Please clarify it.

That's you. If most women were like you society wouldn't be so fucked up.

Most women in society ARE like her... that's what you're failing to see.
 
There are women get off on dirty talk?

You don't say!?!?!
:rolleyes:

Dirty talk of the nature that you were writing about is based in fantasy. That's what my reply was referring to.

OH ok so you missed the fact that it was just being used as an example? And not necessarily... my S/O won't get off at unless I least threaten to fist her and make her the neighborhood cum bucket. But what else would you expect from a soulless ginger?

A geek may leave the lifestyle...

...but the lifestyle never leaves the geek. Geek.

Yea what eyer said......you can 'bro' it up all you want, but you know you want to swing into your fave comic/game shop every time you pass it. Or hit up that comicon/trek convention you have been eyeballing advertisements for.....oh fine go fire up your stargate DVD collection....you know you want to watch it again.
http://stustation.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/stargate-sg-1-children-of-the-gods-final-cut-original.jpg
 
LJ- are you Amicus?

You make as much sense as him.
You troll like him.
You pick apart my words in exactly the same fashion he did- same grammer, same sentence breaks and everything.
It's cool if you are- I was just wondering because I miss you.
 
Most women in society ARE like her... that's what you're failing to see.
I was wondering what your issue was while responding to this post but at this sentence it became pretty clear... you're trolling.

You have to be trolling to say something like that. Or crazy. And I know you're more stable than 50% of this crowd.
 
I was wondering what your issue was while responding to this post but at this sentence it became pretty clear... you're trolling.

You have to be trolling to say something like that. Or crazy. And I know you're more stable than 50% of this crowd.

No, I'm not trolling... you're flailing.

You want to grasp onto anything that will help you promote your anti-woman viewpoints, and to tell you the truth, there isn't much to support your position, other than your personal experiences with women.

If some guy told me that he hated black people because he got robbed a couple times by folks with dark skin as a youth, I'd tell him the same thing.
 
To show that you ain't gonna find GEEK women in that age group. Please... keep up.

Oddly, I never had trouble finding other geeky women to hang out with before I turned 30. Admittedly, it was always awfully easy for us to get a date.
 
LJ- are you Amicus?

You make as much sense as him.
You troll like him.
You pick apart my words in exactly the same fashion he did- same grammer, same sentence breaks and everything.
It's cool if you are- I was just wondering because I miss you.
I'm trolling? This, from a guy who said that women cannot share anything?

Really?
 
No, I'm not trolling... you're flailing.
Nope. You're trolling. Just like the fool who said women can't share anything.

Thanks for playing, though. You had me going.

Edited to add: One more reason why you're wrong? Go to any college engineering class. Notice how FEW women there are? Yeah, your argument is bullshit from so many different directions I never needed to grasp or reach for anything.
 
Last edited:
Edited to add: One more reason why you're wrong? Go to any college engineering class. Notice how FEW women there are? Yeah, your argument is bullshit from so many different directions I never needed to grasp or reach for anything.

Or just go to any college and notice that women outnumber men


http://www.nber.org/digest/jan07/w12139.html

http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/CrossoverinFemaleMaleCollegeEnrollmentRates.aspx

http://www.chillicious.com/finance/college-student-enrollment-facts-and-figures/

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html?pagewanted=all

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm
 
Nope. You're trolling. Just like the fool who said women can't share anything.

Thanks for playing, though. You had me going.

Edited to add: One more reason why you're wrong? Go to any college engineering class. Notice how FEW women there are? Yeah, your argument is bullshit from so many different directions I never needed to grasp or reach for anything.

That's funny you should mention that, because 2 women in their early twenties live right behind me, and are both engineers.

it sounds like you just suck at looking for women.
 
Give women a taste of their own medicine.

Be an alpha female or get your shit sewn up!

Amen.

However, gender roles just don't switch that fast. It takes time. Being an Alpha females means it's easier to get women to date you than men.

Men generally only like being topped by their Bitch in the bedroom.

But, I agree with you. It generally gets me in trouble to agree with you. However, the day of the princess needs to die. A woman who handles her life should be hot, not intimidating.

P.S. Sexually submissive women doesn't automatically mean beta. I saw that in a few posts. If you believe that then you've never had a true bottom female.
 
But, I agree with you. It generally gets me in trouble to agree with you. However, the day of the princess needs to die. A woman who handles her life should be hot, not intimidating.
Now we're getting back to basics.

This is why I love that series "Chuck". It's about the only one I ever watch anymore.

P.S. Sexually submissive women doesn't automatically mean beta. I saw that in a few posts. If you believe that then you've never had a true bottom female.
Nah, beta means a shrinking violet, a perpetual damsel in distress (See: TWILIGHT), women who run and hide when the fighting starts (instead of backing up their man*), that kind of bullshit.


* It's always acceptable for one person to run and hide if you're shielding your kid from rapidly escalating violence, though.
 
Wow you are stupid. I said ENGINEERING, not college in general. Women outnumber men in college but there are almost NONE in Engineering.

I know that soared right over your head so oh well.

I really created a monster when I taught you the word "hypergamy" didn't I?
You only managed to define the problem in one word. I've been talking about the core concepts behind 'hypergamy' for years before you spoke of it.

BTW, Hypergamy was the word of the year in 2010.
the word of the year 2011 is Plutocracy. :)
 
Back
Top