Amicus is a Philogynist! Are you? (Men only)

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
A lover or friend of women; one who esteems woman as the higher type of humanity; - opposed to misogynist.

~~~

Now you know and the secret is out, egads...

Had my first kiss from Patty Ann when we were both four years old...now how sweet is that? I ask ya...:)

ami:rose:
 
Gads...as I am about to retire for the evening and leave you to your own resources, which appear to be minimal. I am about to get pissed off at the General Board, the GB, in general.

I mean, hey, I introduce you to a new word, one few have ever seen before; at least you could say, 'thanks, ami', or something, and you say nothing, fifteen or so of you retreads read this and had no comment? Are you retarded?

There is such a wealth of potential in the question, are you a lover of women, I suspect the mere awareness of the concept knocked you flat on your collective asses and you really don't know how to engage.

Oh, well, hell, there must be intelligence on the internet somewhere...I will continue my search...

Amicus Veritas...an original man...:rose:
 
I just read the thread that spawned this and it was one of Lit's more pop-"cultured" members accusing him of being a misogynist...






... which the gay guy I used to share an apartment with truly was with the lone exception of his mother, who had a shrine in the living room...
 
AMICUS

We hang on every word BUSYBODY and RORYN post and ignore the rest. Its not personal, but they truly express the zeitgeist for so many of us.

So you can stay here and check-out all the two-headed babies, or go to AH and play shuffleboard.
 
I just read the thread that spawned this and it was one of Lit's more pop-"cultured" members accusing him of being a misogynist...


... which the gay guy I used to share an apartment with truly was with the lone exception of his mother, who had a shrine in the living room...

There's no need to accuse Amicus of misogyny.. You only have to read a few of his posts to figure it out on your own as was pointed out pretty well a couple of posts above.

We hold these truths to be self evident...
 
There's no need to accuse Amicus of misogyny.. You only have to read a few of his posts to figure it out on your own as was pointed out pretty well a couple of posts above.

We hold these truths to be self evident...

Do you EVER have anything positive to say?
 
Do you EVER have anything positive to say?

Sure I do.. When it's deserved.

Oddly enough, it doesn't happen all that much where those on the "right" are concerned. Especially when it comes to attitudes displayed by them toward women, black people, brown people, gay people, poor people, etc. etc. etc.

But hey, you can go on defending your fellow Randian nutjob all you want Cap'n.
 
Sure I do.. When it's deserved.

Oddly enough, it doesn't happen all that much where those on the "right" are concerned. Especially when it comes to attitudes displayed by them toward women, black people, brown people, gay people, poor people, etc. etc. etc.

But hey, you can go on defending your fellow Randian nutjob all you want Cap'n.

Here's your typical straw man attack. How did I "defend" him?

All I did was point out the origin of this thread, no more.
 
I just read the thread that spawned this and it was one of Lit's more pop-"cultured" members accusing him of being a misogynist...






... which the gay guy I used to share an apartment with truly was with the lone exception of his mother, who had a shrine in the living room...

If you're referring to me jabbing at the OP, it was actually his comment below that spawned the whole thing. I asked him if it was satire or if he was an asshat. He didn't answer the question. I made my own inference after reading through pages of his posts, many of which kbate referenced above. Is this guy satire? Is he a fuckwit? Only you can decide for yourself.

Along with the Thread about teaching women to read....I personally had a career of thirty years reading and commenting on NEWS on both radio and television, and what I see and hear now is sickening.

Now....I understand Soap Operas and Daytime television for women who stay at home all day, fine, let them sob their way through housework, I could care less. But when some blond bimbo with a thigh high skirt and cleavage that was once considered obscene attempts to deliver straight news, all I can do is giggle.

And those pathetic empathetic eye lifts and mouth moues and tone drops in voice to indicate sorrow at a sad News item, anger, outrage and self righteous indignation at those terrible oil companies or mean old stock brokers, breaks me up into laughter.

If you haven't taken note before, now that I bring it to your attention, you will.

Down with women! (on their backs) Old song: "It's a woman's world, lahdefuckindah! I am so sick of feminism I could barf.

der amicus
 
~~~

Now you know and the secret is out, egads...

Had my first kiss from Patty Ann when we were both four years old...now how sweet is that? I ask ya...:)

ami:rose:

Well, then I guess that just goes to show that Lance was wrong.. Most, if not all, of the people posting on Lit are Women!
 
But when some blond bimbo with a thigh high skirt and cleavage that was once considered obscene attempts to deliver straight news, all I can do is giggle.

And those pathetic empathetic eye lifts and mouth moues and tone drops in voice to indicate sorrow at a sad News item, anger, outrage and self righteous indignation at those terrible oil companies or mean old stock brokers, breaks me up into laughter.

RE: this section of his post:

I have seen waaaaay too many threads on this board concerning who is the most fuckable female newscaster, to think this remark is NOT without merit.

And i do think such actions by women are in direct conflict with the tenants of feminism. We, as women either want recognition based upon out own intellectual merits, or we don't. If it's the former, then flaunting sexuality in the workplace, regardless of the where the workplace might be, is being dishonest with ourselves, our co-workers, and worst of all the generation coming behind us.
 
RE: this section of his post:

I have seen waaaaay too many threads on this board concerning who is the most fuckable female newscaster, to think this remark is NOT without merit.

And i do think such actions by women are in direct conflict with the tenants of feminism. We, as women either want recognition based upon out own intellectual merits, or we don't. If it's the former, then flaunting sexuality in the workplace, regardless of the where the workplace might be, is being dishonest with ourselves, our co-workers, and worst of all the generation coming behind us.

I agree plus a love-hate realationship with the opposite sex? Many of us have it I suspect.

Btw thanks for the PM Ami ... I'm notoriously bad answering them.
 
I agree plus a love-hate realationship with the opposite sex? Many of us have it I suspect.

Btw thanks for the PM Ami ... I'm notoriously bad answering them.

I think this is quite true, Cookie.

Loving or liking the opposite sex does not preclude us from being disappointed in their actions from time to time.
 
der Amicrank as a philogynist? The guy who posts rants against women ad naseum is now someone who loves and esteems women?

A lover or friend of women; one who esteems woman as the higher type of humanity; - opposed to misogynist.

Do I yet again detect cognitive dissonance here?

Cognitive Dissonance is the feeling of uncomfortable tension which comes from holding two conflicting thoughts in the mind at the same time.

Seeing as how Ami doesn't seem the slightest bit uncomfortable about holding two incompatible thoughts about women at the same time, I'll guess that his Randroid programming forbids cognitive dissonance. Or perhaps it's his underlying borderline personality, which is remarkably similar to Randroid programming. In his case, it's hard to tell the difference.

Ami, have fun snickering at those of us who find you to be a tad dissonant, which is why you started the thread. I haven't read the Ayn Rand Institute's playbook but I suspect this tactic to be on page one. What said playbook doesn't contain is the explanation of why the rest of us snicker at your snickering. That would introduce yet more cognitive dissonance.
 
Last edited:
RE: this section of his post:

I have seen waaaaay too many threads on this board concerning who is the most fuckable female newscaster, to think this remark is NOT without merit.

And i do think such actions by women are in direct conflict with the tenants of feminism. We, as women either want recognition based upon out own intellectual merits, or we don't. If it's the former, then flaunting sexuality in the workplace, regardless of the where the workplace might be, is being dishonest with ourselves, our co-workers, and worst of all the generation coming behind us.

^^ and the same applies to men
It doesn't really matter how many threads you've seen
I think amicus is a disgusting, woman-hating pig
you may or may not agree and that's fine
 
Last edited:
^^ and the same applies to men
It doesn't really matter how many threads you've seen
I think amicus is a disgusting, woman-hating pig
you may not agree and that's fine

Dear she is not agreeing or disagreeing about amicus...she is simply pointing to a fact and agreeing with that.

And yes the male pretty quota has been upped for broadcasters. The game from my view started in the 80's. It is not even near even. Women and men in this field are trying to make a living, I find no fault in that. If you want to get paid, you play. I do find fault in broadcasting media in general. It is so much less impartial than it use to be. Print and internet media the same. They run with stories that aren't verified, and retractions come in minutes instead of hours or days. All I know, even 20 years ago some of the stories that run would have resulted in a lawsuit and or firing.
 
Back
Top