Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,048
But you probably wouldn't have let yourself be set up like that, either.
They would not have let him into the library. Not in Texas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you probably wouldn't have let yourself be set up like that, either.
That's actually a separate issue.They would not have let him into the library. Not in Texas.
There are 60. A already provided the link.
That's actually a separate issue.
Oh, and by the way, I said there were five sponsors in the Senate, and you replied with the number of sponsors in both houses without explaining that's what you did. Just wanted to clarify that. The others are in the House.
At those numbers of sponsors, it's like saying Ron Paul went from 1% support to 2%...it's easy to make "big" changes on a small base. There's no reason to expect support will dramatically increase any time soon.
But that's a detail.It is? How do you fly a plane into the Trade Center when you cannot get on the plane?
But that's a detail.
Obviously, he couldn't fly a plane into the WTC unless he could get on one, and obviously, he couldn't have been set up as a patsy by the CIA if he couldn't get into a book depository (not actually a library, btw).
But, if he could have, it's my belief that he wouldn't have allowed himself to be set up in that way.
Wasn't Oswald a Marine?
I heard he was a poor shot.
I think about stuff.Why do you have to be like that?
Forget the thread: make your case.[hijack]
I can make a case that Oswald was indeed a poor shot. And it was because he was a poor shot that he actually hit JFK. [/hijack]
Economic collapse will cause many people to look for answers
What if a flat tax would allow the US to raise the minimum wage?That will give you time to work out a response to my previous note, where I explained (in essence) that you can have either:
- keep all your current gross, but everything costs 30% more, or
- keep all your current net, and everything costs the same.
You just don't get "more money in your pocket" with current prices.
What if a flat tax would allow the US to raise the minimum wage?
Would it be okay, then?
Oh, I don't know, a few people could have predicted that...OK for whom?
For me, I'm not a big fan of minimum wage. We upped it by a lot recently, and a lot of people are out of work now. Who could have predicted that?
Oh, I don't know, a few people could have predicted that...
The thing is, is it better to work for $7.25 an hour, or fall into the safety net, and make extra cash under the table?
Cash you pay no taxes on?
I had a guy do some interior work recently, no paperwork. He did an excellent job, and I paid him in cash.
yes, net = gross, but only because gross will be reduced to the current net.
I had a guy do some interior work recently, no paperwork. He did an excellent job, and I paid him in cash.
You would not know an excellent job if it was stuffed up your asshole and tied to your hair!
There's no call for this nastiness.
Especially when it circumvents the taxes the government is trying to collect.Cash is a good thing.
I would never buy an asshook made in Colorado.You would not know an excellent job if it was stuffed up your asshole and tied to your hair!