We are all Charlie.

[YDB95]

And so did you! And you still do.

Whatever I may be guilty of, absolutely no one - not even you - cherrypicks like Dumpington did. Perhaps the reason why it looks that way to you is because I look at the whole picture and you just aren't used to that.

I’ve backed my assertions with facts, in criminal cases I’ve supported my assertions with statutory facts. I’m just tired of repeating myself.

One thing I've noticed about your style is that you often claim to have said something reasonable like this at some indiscriminate point in the past. And yet neither you nor anyone else can ever point to such an example.

How can anyone quantify a riot, street violence. So, if 10 people are in a crowd, one pulls out a firearm and shoots somebody dead, you’re telling me that 90% was peaceful.

That's horseshit and you know it. We've been over this dozens of times: "mostly peaceful" does NOT mean any individual protest was 93% peaceful and 7% violent. It means 93% of the protests had 0% violence. And they did.

How do you account for the aftermath, the businesses destroyed, the lives lost, the police officers injured.

I look at who actually caused the violence (hint: in many cases among that 7%, it was NOT the BLM protesters, it was the counterprotesters), and I fully support their facing the music. As did Joe Biden himself, who unequivocally condemned the violence in 2020.

George Floyd, a thug, resist arrest and loses his life because of drug overdose and all hell breaks loose.

Even a thug who resists arrest does not deserve to have a cop kneel on his neck until he suffocates. What part of that don't you get? We already know you don't get the bigger picture: that the reaction to what happened to Floyd was not about him alone, it was about police brutality against Blacks in general.

Charlie gets assassinated and nothing but peaceful vigils. 100% peaceful. Why can I say that? because there were no riots. Those numbers can be accurately quantified.

Actually, there have been threats of violence on his behalf. But that's beside the point. Look, I'm glad what happened to him didn't trigger any rioting. But it's an apples-to-oranges comparison, and you are still making a point of ignoring that 93% of the BLM protests were peaceful.

That 93% number you state is a phony made up media number which doesn’t accurately reflect the reality of what happened.

According to whom, exactly? Literally the only claim I've ever seen to that end was the one you just made above, which deliberately misinterprets the statistic.

It sounds good, look good but it doesn’t add up. The only reason you believe in those numbers has to be because you’re OK with violence to to an end.

You mean like January 6? No, I am not OK with that sort of thing at all.

Top lawyer, assistant AG, name escapes me, but she told Weiss to stand down. The IRS has evidence that would have tied Joe Biden to Hunter’s criminal activities with China, Russia, and Ukraine. There’s a reason why Biden wanted Shokin fired.

Yeah, and that reason was that he was corrupt and the entire Western diplomatic community wanted him gone. And "Hunter's criminal activities" were drug use and lying on an application for a firearms permit. They had nothing to do with any other country.

I sourced all those allegations. Trump’s phone call with Zelensky ended up with an impeachment, why? Because Trump was spot on with the Biden crime family’s criminal racket.

No, because Trump overstepped his constitutional boundaries and tried to bribe a foreign leader into digging up dirt on his opposition. Even if there really were any evidence Biden was involved with any illegal activities in Ukraine - and there wasn't - what Trump did was not the way to address that issue.

Bullshit, he was charged and plead guilty for a 9 count indictment 3 of which were tax felonies and six misdemeanors tax offenses.

None of which would normally result in much if any jail time. That's my point.

 

[glamorilla]

I can respect dancing on your enemies grave.

Shame it had to happen to such a godly man.

 

[schism666]

 

[dmallord]

My statement!!!

icanhelp1 said:
When those felony charges are overturned you and ducky are going to have a lot of crow to eat. "The fraud case went down in flames and James is NOW in the hot seat. KARMA"

Where did I say the case was overturned?

Over several posts, you’ve consistently rejected clear, sourced information and framed my reasoning as “TDS” rather than engaging with the facts. When you said “the fraud case went down in flames,” it naturally reads as a decisive loss—something collapsing completely, as the phrase commonly means. Interpreting it otherwise now seems less about language and more about fitting a narrative you already favor. Words have meaning, and moving the goalposts doesn’t change that.

 

[icanhelp1]

Over several posts, you’ve consistently rejected clear, sourced information and framed my reasoning as “TDS” rather than engaging with the facts. When you said “the fraud case went down in flames,” it naturally reads as a decisive loss—something collapsing completely, as the phrase commonly means. Interpreting it otherwise now seems less about language and more about fitting a narrative you already favor. Words have meaning, and moving the goalposts doesn’t change that.

I stated “down in flames” because Letitia James’s primary intent was to financially destroy Trump. It didn’t happen. I’ve supported my narratives with legal opinions from the likes of Jonathan Turley, Andrew McCarthy, both who have described the allegations, trial and rulings by Ergoron as excessive, victimless and politically motivated. Many legal pundits have echoed the same observations over the case.. IT WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED and smelled of legal impropriety, selective prosecution and victimless. You can stand by your original assertions that Trump was fined, found guilty in a NY court of law. But in the background of this case it was known to consist of voodoo math. The banks knew more about risk assessment than the courts but Ergoron being politically challenged himself ignored the reality of the evidence and went along with James. My point to you is, when the rulings found Trump guilty, fined him 350+ million dollars you were ecstatic over the ruling not because justice prevailed but because Trump was damaged goods and was one step closer to losing in the elections. This case is on its way to New Your’s court of appeal where I predict Trump will be acquitted of all charges.

You had the same mindset for the Bragg case. You bragged about 34 felons from the most judicially distorted sham case in NY’s history. Once again your jubilant demeanor after the conviction tell me you were never interested in justice, more like jubilant over the destruction of Trump’s campaign. TDS through and through. You lack fairness and good judgement. You’re politically motivated and yet here we are, for all your nail biting, Trump won.

 

[RoryN]

You lack fairness and good judgement

...said THIS guy:

I wonder if it's all those black daddies living by the 4 fs ( find them, feel them, fuck them, forget them ).

Post in thread 'The real badbabysitter finally revealed..' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/the-real-badbabysitter-finally-revealed.1504564/post-90980000

blacks have a higher propensity of violence than all races combined.

Post in thread 'If America Is Racist, Why Have Millions of Blacks Emigrated Here?' https://forum.literotica.com/thread...f-blacks-emigrated-here.1547263/post-93907526

I find that African Americans are more racist than white folks...I wouldn’t even think of walking a predominately black neighborhood, wouldn’t end well.

Post in thread 'White Officers in Minority Communities' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/white-officers-in-minority-communities.1525284/post-92435953

 

[HisArpy]

No valid ones that I am aware of. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to lie with impunity.

Unless you're Jimmy Kimmel...

 

[dmallord]

I stated “down in flames” because Letitia James’s primary intent was to financially destroy Trump. It didn’t happen. I’ve supported my narratives with legal opinions from the likes of Jonathan Turley, Andrew McCarthy, both who have described the allegations, trial and rulings by Ergoron as excessive, victimless and politically motivated. Many legal pundits have echoed the same observations over the case.. IT WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED and smelled of legal impropriety, selective prosecution and victimless.

Whoa there, a minute, Bubba. This is a convoluted mess. First of all, this thread doesn't mention your support by the likes of John Turley or McCarthy. Maybe elsewhere, but certainly not in this thread. This comes late to your own defense here. I'm not a mind reader. What you delivered was not objective; it was laced with personal convictions, inflammatory language [no pun intended], sans any of the support you now claim to champion your subjective opinion.

Secondly, you have separated both gentlemen from the line you wrote next about legal pundits echoing their opinions as though they are a level above pundits. Turley, who passed away in July, and McCarthy were well-known legal pundits and paid consultants under contract with Fox News. Neither gentleman attended the trial. They expressed their views in exchange for compensation based upon news events and post-readings of transcripts, perhaps, which inevitably carries inherent bias factors due to the need to appease their customers. The baseline definition of a legal pundit is an individual who offers expert opinions and commentary on legal issues via mass media channels like television, radio, and online platforms. Unlike journalists, they openly express their own analysis and perspectives, rather than striving for impartiality. Pundits are not bound by the rules of law or subject to impartial assessment like judges, prosecutors, or a jury. Both gentlemen have a history of partiality in numerous past cases, which is expected. They don't get hired to support the opposition.

I have to smile a bit as I write this. You do know that while you complain about being politically motivated, the convicted felon is demanding that Pam Bondi prosecute his enemies' list as a personal vendetta. He doesn't have charges for her to use but wants her to find them guilty and punished in retribution. He ordered another AG to charge James, but when he said he had no evidence to charge her, Trump fired him and ordered Bondi to find something. Trump's own demands provide clear evidence that contradicts your claim that political motivation should be excluded from consideration in his felony case. The irony, right?

You can stand by your original assertions that Trump was fined, found guilty in a NY court of law.

When Trump was asked about the Haitians eating people's pets, he replied, 'I only report what they said. I didn't say that; I wasn't there.' Well, I, too, only report what they said, and that's also what the jury found. And the judge determined Trump's fine, not Leticia James. A next-level court determined the fine was inappropriate and changed that. More importantly, the appellate court found that the case was merited and the other aspects were still valid. The next-tier court validated the first court's base finding. So it isn't only my original assertions that are true; it's the judicial system's assertions that are validated.

Your vilification slipped a gear in that validation at an upper appeals court. While you blame the first tier for being biased and politically motivated, the second level reviewed the case for the correct application of the law and found that the lower court met the judicial requirements for trial and conviction, albeit it changed the harsh penalty assigned.

You're stewing over the politicization of trials for Trump as we write here. Trump, meanwhile, is trampling over his Justice Department by politicizing and ordering his Attorney General to prosecute his opponents without cause.

But in the background of this case it was known to consist of voodoo math. The banks knew more about risk assessment than the courts but Ergoron being politically challenged himself ignored the reality of the evidence and went along with James. My point to you is, when the rulings found Trump guilty, fined him 350+ million dollars you were ecstatic over the ruling not because justice prevailed but because Trump was damaged goods and was one step closer to losing in the elections. This case is on its way to New Your’s court of appeal where I predict Trump will be acquitted of all charges.

I predict the opposite will happen. I'll wait and see just like you. However, I'll smile until you win, perhaps in the end. I'll accept the decision as I've previously said, either way.

You had the same mindset for the Bragg case. You bragged about 34 felons from the most judicially distorted sham case in NY’s history. Once again your jubilant demeanor after the conviction tell me you were never interested in justice, more like jubilant over the destruction of Trump’s campaign. TDS through and through. You lack fairness and good judgement. You’re politically motivated and yet here we are, for all your nail biting, Trump won.

Well, at least I accept he did win in a fair election process. Give me credit for that! As for the rest of your ascriptions, you are free to express your sentiments, even if they are incorrect. You're hanging yourself with that overworked and now useless TDS remark. Anyone and everyone is seeing Trump's true colors on full display, and MAGA members are waking up to it as well. His hiding the Epstein matter will be his poison pill for the upcoming elections; that's my inkling of what's to come.

 

[dmallord]

Unless you're Jimmy Kimmel...

As Orwell said, "...however much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing, as it were, behind your back."

 

[ChinoMoreno]

What the heck bro?!

 

[ChinoMoreno]

Unless you're Jimmy Kimmel...

What did my mans lie about?

 

[HisArpy]

What did my mans lie about?

I'll tell you but you're going to need to take a long walk off a short pier first so you can remain calm during the telling.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

I'll tell you but you're going to need to take a long walk off a short pier first so you can remain calm during the telling.

I'm with you bro. I couldn't find any lies by him either

 

[Lazaran]

What the heck bro?!

View attachment 2566894

I honestly read that as: “What the neck bro”, and I had to do a double take…



Meanwhile:

Charlie Cook (not a typo) is still dead, right???

Anyway…

 

[HisArpy]

I'm with you bro. I couldn't find any lies by him either

That's because you're still sitting in front of your computer instead of taking that head-clearing walk I just mentioned.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

That's because you're still sitting in front of your computer instead of taking that head-clearing walk I just mentioned.

Nah my dude it's because he didn't lie. You did

 

[HisArpy]

Nah my dude it's because he didn't lie. You did

I haven't yet responded to your request because I'm still waiting on your return from that long walk.

If you're too lazy to get out of your mom's basement and take a walk, no one is going to be able to help you clear the fog in your head.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

I haven't yet responded to your request because I'm still waiting on your return from that long walk.

If you're too lazy to get out of your mom's basement and take a walk, no one is going to be able to help you clear the fog in your head.

Did you dial up with AOL to make that ancient "basement" blast my dude?

 

[HisArpy]

Did you dial up with AOL to make that ancient "basement" blast my dude?

No, I used a semaphore from the end of the pier in the hope I'd catch your attention and motivate you to investigate the depths of my thinking regarding that walk I've mentioned several times now.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

No, I used a semaphore from the end of the pier in the hope I'd catch your attention and motivate you to investigate the depths of my thinking regarding that walk I've mentioned several times now.

Bro wouldn't it just take a lot less effort to admit that you lied?

 

[HisArpy]

Bro wouldn't it just take a lot less effort to admit that you lied?

About what? I haven't responded to you yet other than making a suggestion for you to go outside and touch seaweed.

 

[Lazaran]

“We are all Charlie”

<checks neck>

N.O.P.E…

 

[EboniMidnite]

View attachment 2566211

Do you think I'm Charlie? Do I look like Charlie? Would you even want someone that looks like me standing next to you at the Charlie funeral?

It's sad if anyone dies an early or violent death, I would never question that. But I am precisely what he is not. And you know this.

 

[LilKitKat]

You know the best part of this meme?

It's true.

Because DEMOCRATS deserve to be outed as the liars and hypocrites they really are and the credit for a peaceful/prosperous society ought to go to the Republicans who create it.

So yeah, both sides arguments show that it's Republicans who are working in your best interests.

As a female. Asian. Member of the LGBTQ commuity, I think I have a pretty darn good idea that Republicans arent serving my interests at all, especially the current insane regime.

 

[AnomalyLady]

As a female. Asian. Member of the LGBTQ commuity, I think I have a pretty darn good idea that Republicans arent serving my interests at all, especially the current insane regime.

I’m pansexual. How does an administration serve someone’s sexual orientation?