12 patriots found him guilty.
And an appeals court may very well throw the case out. Count your chickens but later on you may have to eat them raw.
That's a negatory on that. He was found guilty of sexual assault and fined in a civil court for a sham accusation that outran the statutes of limitation.
With good cause. I don't believe Biden won either.
And your point being?
For now.
You voted for Biden, much worse.
You unpatriotic dipshits are putting all your ovaries in the pedo basket.
I want every Dem who trafficked young girls and or sexually assaulted them prosecuted to the max.
He was found liable of sexual assault and had to pay out millions. 27 other women over decades have made the same claim. Only a retard can't connect the dots, like you and Ms wat. You are a proud pedophile and rape enabler. Hopefully you have daughters that will be raped by a fellow trumptard.
Take him down then, moron. Your pedophile president swore he would release the files until he saw his name in there a dozen times. This is why the world is alienating you morons and mocking you.
No trumptard would say that. The pedophiles (Ms wat) love protecting each other.
Exhibit A: typical leftist.
And they have been joined by many MAGA members demanding that the felon fulfill his promises to release the Epstein files. You don't see the irony in that, do you? Trump even claims that those MAGA members have been brainwashed and are idiots now. Maybe... there is a crisis he is hiding that might lead to impeachment again. Who knows?
Doesn't this also fall into the category of 'reportable'? Asking for a friend.
As I've mentioned on several occasions, if Trump's cases are overturned, I'll accept them. That's the way the law works. I expect, though, if they are upheld, you will continue to crow vociferously that he was railroaded.
Lawyer lies to us again. The conviction wasn't overturned:
Why are you repeating what I wrote. How am I wrong? If I'm wrong then your wrong. I'm all for releasing the files and I've written on many occasions, let the chips fall where they may. Maybe there are still some legal issues to be dealt with.
Words from an admitted liar should be taken with two grains of salt before swallowing them.
What? Nope! I guess. Calling pp a hapless dung sucking beetle is appropriate, it's what he is, no violence there.
I'm shaking my head over this statement. You have comprehension issues. I'm not a reading expert, but I suggest looking into resources to help improve your reading skills, such as reading improvement books. They are not like the bogus books you would buy on 'how to whistle.'
Letitia James overreached, she tried to make a $5,000 misdemeanor charge into a half a billion dollars fine. The judge is just as responsible as James for going along with it. It exposed James as a conflicted ant-Trump AG. She brought shame to the NY judicial system which used to be the gold standard. Her and Bragg have made a laughing stock of NY's state's justice system. Now she's in the hot seat, just reinforces the narrative that democrats always accuse republicans for what they are doing behind the scenes.As I've mentioned on several occasions, if Trump's cases are overturned, I'll accept them. That's the way the law works. I expect, though, if they are upheld, you will continue to crow vociferously that he was railroaded.
The fraud case didn't go down in flames; your poor reading comprehension skills are on display here. The ruling was that the fine was inappropriately high. The case basis was not stricken. It stands and is still under appeal. Even a felon has some rights.
Some light reading for you:
- Monetary penalty tossed: The Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously voided the massive financial penalty, which had grown to over $500 million with interest. Two judges on the panel cited the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on "excessive fines," stating the amount was disproportionate since the banks were not financially harmed.
- Liability for fraud upheld: While dismissing the penalty, the appeals court kept in place the trial judge's finding that Trump and his company had committed fraud by inflating asset values for years to secure better loan terms.
- Injunctions approved: The appeals court approved the non-monetary punishments, which include a ban on Trump and his sons from running New York companies for a period of time. The appointment of an independent monitor for the Trump Organization was also upheld.
No valid ones that I am aware of. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to lie with impunity.
I remember a whole lot of noise about that from jerks like Gym Jordan, but that's it.
They weren't peacefully praying, they were blocking access to the clinics. Take it from someone who has actually been on the front lines of that battle, we know the difference between the ones who just stand there and pray and the ones who get in patients' faces, and it was not the former who were being targeted.
Your reading for comp is challenged. I wrote Trump campaigned on releasing the files and came up lame. I even chastised Bondi for her fuckup. As far as continuing legal issues stop pretending you know better cuz you don't.
You are proving my point about not letting go of your bias. I predicted you would come back and continue to support Trump's claims even though the case is under appeal. And you did with vengeance, even after you just said let the chips fall where they may. You couldn't just let it go.
