We are all Charlie.

[Rotadom]

 

[HisArpy]

Sorry, I limit the amount of time I spend talking with brainwashed MAGAts.

Which is where your problem begins.

 

[coati]

Which is where your problem begins.

^^^An admission by Harpy that most MAGAts are brainwashed.

 

[coati]

View attachment 2566491

Amen

 

[Lazaran]

You really don’t understand what happened with Kimmel do ya?

EVERY decent, intelligent, patriotic, freedom loving Americans KNOWS EXACTLY “what happened with Kimmel”: It was straight up fascist censoring of free speech through coercion by / from DonOld Trump’s fascist administration:; and fascist censoring through coercion that traitorous MAGAts (like ineedhelp1) fully support / supported.

I would hope your diagnosis for sociopathic / psychopathic tendencies would include you. Your hatred for Trump is obsessive and certainly not normal. That amount of hatred has to affect people around you. You need psychiatric medical attention and some serious medication.

I hope that helps

ineedhelp1 FAILS to realize / recognize that I am merely allotting the exact same amount of "hate" to DonOld Trump as I allot to other racists, fascists, bigots, and authority figures who abuse / have abused their authority (See: Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Putin, Derek Chauvin, Grand Dragons of thenKKK, Charlie Cook (not a typo), Nick Fuentes, etc, etc).

Also:

I hope my comments are helpful / persuasive to those who are open to their meaning & purpose, and corrosive to close-minded MAGAts.

Hope that ^ helps.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[LilKitKat]

Not trying to "man-splain" anything to you, but being a man myself, and having had a looooong career in forensic psyche (dealing with sociopaths & psychopaths) I would just offer this bit of insight into the minds of right wing individuals like "Right"guide, Charlie Cook (not a typo), etc:

In my personal and professional experience, the most dangerous right wing sociopathic / psychopathic gaslighters are the ones who are PRESENTING as civil under certain select circumstances / in certain select situations but are ACTUALLY only PRETENDING to be civil in those circumstances / situations in an effort to “get their foot in the door” / “exploit an opening”.

“It’s the quiet ones” DEFINITELY applies in the case of sociopathic / psychopathic right wing gaslighters.

Proceed with caution.

All I know is, certain right wingers on this site are more interesting to debate with than others. Some actually try to defend their position with some sort of possibly/partial factual arguments, some just use "punny" responses, and others just resort to name calling. I tend to listen to them in that order. And in my sporadic experience on this sub @Rightguide has been more interesting and tolerable and such than most of the other right wingers. I did say that he had once privately DM'd me and we didnt talk about anything political nor flirty/sexual...just economics/work/life stuff and it was courteous.
Trust me, I can handle myself online just fine and know where the report and block buttons are

 

[RoryN]

Am I Charlie yet?

 

[coati]

Am I Charlie yet?

BabyBoomer says we are all Charlie Cook (sic).

 

[RoryN]

BabyBoomer says we are all Charlie Cook (sic).

 

[Lazaran]

All I know is, cerain right wingers on this site are more interesting to debate with than others. Some actually try to defend their position with some sort of possibly/partial factual arguments, some just use "punny" responses, and others just resort to name calling. I tend to listen to them in that order. And in my sporadic experience on this sub @Rightguide has been more interesting and tolerable and such than most of the other right wingers. I did say that he had once privately DM'd me and we didnt talk about anything political nor flirty/sexual...just economics/work/life stuff and it was courteous.
Trust me, I can handle myself online just fine and know where the report and block buttons are

I would just say this in response to that description of your civil interaction(s?) with "Right"guide: The very fact that "Right"guide didn’t attempt to engage in at least SOME playful / flirtatious banter in a PM on a porn site throws up all sorts of red flags. I don’t know you well (barely at all), but from what I have seen and read, you are quite something (in a good way), and if I were to have PM’d you on this site, it would have been for fun (though you are way too young for me to play with you in a PM and not feel creepy, so I would / will never PM you).

Also: It sounds like "Right"guide could have discussed those things you mentioned in the public threads, so, that is another red flag.

Meanwhile: To my professional forensic psyche mind, it would appear "Right"guide was trying to get you to lower your defenses (not grooming, per se, but certainly grooming adjacent) with their "harmless" / "non-threatening engagement", and they may well have been trying to get you to drop some information about your location & identity, etc (although you seem pretty open, so I suspect that doesn’t enter into the equation for you - but it does to a forensic professional & protective dad such as myself).

Ultimately: you’re obviously free to do you and engage as you please - but my earlier advice(?) still stands: “Proceed with caution”.

 

[icanhelp1]

Disney bent the knee. The American people said “fuck that!” and forced them to stand up to Trump.

EVERY decent, intelligent, patriotic, freedom loving Americans KNOWS EXACTLY “what happened with Kimmel”: It was straight up fascist censoring of free speech through coercion by / from DonOld Trump’s fascist administration:; and fascist censoring through coercion that traitorous MAGAts (like ineedhelp1) fully support / supported.

No one censored free speech more than Joe Biden and his criminal administration.

ineedhelp1 FAILS to realize / recognize that I am merely allotting the exact same amount of "hate" to DonOld Trump as I allot to other racists, fascists, bigots, and authority figures who abuse / have abused their authority (See: Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Putin, Derek Chauvin, Grand Dragons of thenKKK, Charlie Cook (not a typo), Nick Fuentes, etc, etc).

Ya left out Joe Biden, Merrick Garland , Letitia James, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Adam Schiff, James Comey, Susan Rice, Clapper, Brennan, Hillary Clinton, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Pelosi, Schumer, Jack Smith, Barrack Obama, and a whole host of other reprobates you left out who abused their authority.

Also:

I hope my comments are helpful / persuasive to those who are open to their meaning & purpose, and corrosive to close-minded MAGAts.

Hope that ^ helps.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[YDB95]

No one censored free speech more than Joe Biden and his criminal administration.

Are you trying to lose all your credibility? Biden never did anything remotely like what happened here, and you know it.

 

[Mulierscriptor]

View attachment 2566212

Serious ??? Aren’t you strange ????

 

[icanhelp1]

Are you trying to lose all your credibility? Biden never did anything remotely like what happened here, and you know it.

The Biden administration trampled all over the first amendment. You know it and I know. How many medical opinions on Covid vaccines and other medical opinions from expert medical doctors were taken down. Biden’s FBI targeting parents at school board meetings. Arresting people for peacefully praying outside of abortion clinics. I’m not going to waste my time digging through news archives. Free speech is the foundation of our republic and I will defend it. The Jimmy Kimmel isn’t a free speech issue for obvious reasons, he’s back on night time schedule.

I will point out behavior that is inappropriate by any political party regardless. I believe in protecting free speech. Pam Bondi’s comment of legally going after hate speech is not only wrongheaded but perhaps a fireable offense. As an AG that comment is inexcusable and sets a negative precedent. Her comments didn’t help the Trump administration. I gave her the benefit of the doubt for the Epstein file misspeak, but this hate speech comment is unacceptable. Unlike you and your Ilk I will call inappropriate behavior when I see it.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

The Biden administration trampled all over the first amendment. You know it and I know. How many medical opinions on Covid vaccines and other medical opinions from expert medical doctors were taken down. Biden’s FBI targeting parents at school board meetings. Arresting people for peacefully praying outside of abortion clinics. I’m not going to waste my time digging through news archives. Free speech is the foundation of our republic and I will defend it. The Jimmy Kimmel isn’t a free speech issue for obvious reasons, he’s back on night time schedule.

I will point out behavior that is inappropriate by any political party regardless. I believe in protecting free speech. Pam Bondi’s comment of legally going after hate speech is not only wrongheaded but perhaps a fireable offense. As an AG that comment is inexcusable and sets a negative precedent. Her comments didn’t help the Trump administration. I gave her the benefit of the doubt for the Epstein file misspeak, but this hate speech comment is unacceptable. Unlike you and your Ilk I will call inappropriate behavior when I see it.

That upsets you but the raping and pedophilia is okay by you.

Shut up, potato boi.

 

[icanhelp1]

That upsets you but the raping and pedophilia is okay by you.

Shut up, potato boi.

Why do you believe that? you ignorant fool. You must hate yourself!

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Are you trying to lose all your credibility? Biden never did anything remotely like what happened here, and you know it.

You have zero credibility. One second on the “the google” produced Fifty-seven times Ol’ Pudd’n Head trampled all over free speech.

 

[icanhelp1]

You have zero credibility. One second on the “the google” produced Fifty-seven times Ol’ Pudd’n Head trampled all over free speech.

Presenting facts to these lunes is an exercise in futility. The TDS barrier is impenetrable.

 

[dmallord]

As I said, nothing of substance at all.

Here's the thing you dipshits on the Left are missing. Charlie's entire program was based on one simple thing; definitions. If you listen to him debate, you'll notice that it's all about definitions.

Name one thing that I said which was bigoted.
Name one thing that I said which shows I support fascism.
Can we agree on what a woman is.
And so on.

The concepts are simple to the point of being simplistic. His ENTIRE program was about getting people to engage with him regardless of the subject matter. He wrapped it all up in his faith, but the point is that he traveled to colleges to stir the pot and get engagement. Then he used that engagement as a platform for self promotion.

Had YOU DIPSHITS left him alone he'd have flamed out within a few years.

But you couldn't do that. YOUR hate was just as strong as his, though he at least covered with with a veneer of civility while you still think violence is the one and only answer to everything that stands in the way of you getting whatever it is that you want.

So you assassinated him and guaranteed he'd become a martyr and famous. His name will be used to beat you time and time and time again and you won't be able to prevent it because you created the invincible sword that will hack your movement to pieces.

God Damn, you fuckers are stupid.

You've summed up Kirk's life pretty well: a man wrapped up in religious clothing, making his living running a political agenda that some right-wing billionaire propped up. A 'flammer' in a few years, you noted that was covered in a veneer of civility. Seems you didn't care for the guy much at all.

So, I thought he was murdered by a crazy person with his grandfather's antique bolt-action hunting rifle, which he was trained to use since childhood in a family of gun enthusiasts. That doesn't seem to fit the typical 'left-wing fanatic killer.' It looks more like a MAGA-leaning individual. Has someone found out he was really a left-winger? Not that it matters here. What matters is that one guy, not a political party, who seemed 'normal' to his family, went off the rails, feeling compelled to kill someone he believed wasn't as devoted to Trump as he should have been.

You've taken time to twist that into a cause célèbre again against the Democratic Party, falsely blaming it for this sad madman's singular actions.

Your forecast of Kirk as a guaranteed famous martyr, wielding an invincible sword, smacks of a right-wing religious concept you're projecting onto Kirk's legacy. Your continued vilification of a collective Democrat Party, you claim, is responsible. Given your take on the role of women and Kirk's expressed sentiments, his grieving widow shouldn't be able to bear up and carry on his role as right-wing Christian pot stirrer for very long, either. With two children to raise, in a Christian light manner, Kirk would likely say his grieving widow should retreat to a life of privacy, raise her little ones to forgive their father's killer as she expressed, and find a nice Christian man to take care of her again. Isn't that a match for your sentiments as well?

When the party of Trump finds her usefulness flagging, it will predictably move on as it has shown itself to do in abandoning whatever is no longer useful fodder for the loose cannon in the White House. That is a much more likely outcome than your prognostications here.

 

[icanhelp1]

You have zero credibility. One second on the “the google” produced Fifty-seven times Ol’ Pudd’n Head trampled all over free speech.

This report details 57 distinct Biden initiatives that targeted Americans’ ability to speak their minds. The degree and extent of this coordination is dizzying, spanning no fewer than 90 different government agencies, entangling hundreds of government officials and including thousands of individual censorship actions. The number of people silenced, or prevented from receiving messages they wanted to hear, is all but incalculable. The harm to the nation’s constitutional framework and the system of limited government is similarly beyond measure.

 

[dmallord]

There were twenty to forty thousand more outside.

More for Kirk's funeral than a Trump rally. It was a very good day for the city's commerce and vendors of KirK merch, in particular. Those crowds outside did leave a massive mess for the city to clean up, as evidenced by the videos that focused on the aftermath. Right-wingers with little concern for the environment, I suppose.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

More for Kirk's funeral than a Trump rally. It was a very good day for the city's commerce and vendors of KirK merch, in particular. Those crowds outside did leave a massive mess for the city to clean up, as evidenced by the videos that focused on the aftermath. Right-wingers with little concern for the environment, I suppose.

If that’s all you took away from his Memorial…

No wonder you Radicalized democrats are such a sad loony lot.

 

[icanhelp1]

You've summed up Kirk's life pretty well: a man wrapped up in religious clothing, making his living running a political agenda that some right-wing billionaire propped up. A 'flammer' in a few years, you noted that was covered in a veneer of civility. Seems you didn't care for the guy much at all.

So, I thought he was murdered by a crazy person with his grandfather's antique bolt-action hunting rifle, which he was trained to use since childhood in a family of gun enthusiasts. That doesn't seem to fit the typical 'left-wing fanatic killer.' It looks more like a MAGA-leaning individual. Has someone found out he was really a left-winger? Not that it matters here. What matters is that one guy, not a political party, who seemed 'normal' to his family, went off the rails, feeling compelled to kill someone he believed wasn't as devoted to Trump as he should have been.

You've taken time to twist that into a cause célèbre again against the Democratic Party, falsely blaming it for this sad madman's singular actions.

Your forecast of Kirk as a guaranteed famous martyr, wielding an invincible sword, smacks of a right-wing religious concept you're projecting onto Kirk's legacy. Your continued vilification of a collective Democrat Party, you claim, is responsible. Given your take on the role of women and Kirk's expressed sentiments, his grieving widow shouldn't be able to bear up and carry on his role as right-wing Christian pot stirrer for very long, either. With two children to raise, in a Christian light manner, Kirk would likely say his grieving widow should retreat to a life of privacy, raise her little ones to forgive their father's killer as she expressed, and find a nice Christian man to take care of her again. Isn't that a match for your sentiments as well?

When the party of Trump finds her usefulness flagging, it will predictably move on as it has shown itself to do in abandoning whatever is no longer useful fodder for the loose cannon in the White House. That is a much more likely outcome than your prognostications here.

Robinson's political affiliation and leanings in this case has zero to do with his parents political affiliation. His parents even admitted their son was leaning hard left.

Promoting family values, marriage, having children, anti-abortion, open dialogue, polite discourse, practicing your faith is the antithetic to the democratic party. People payed tribute to Charlie absent the riots in the streets, burning cities down, killings, destroying homes and small businesses, tearing down statues, burning police stations down with police inside, attacking court houses, attacking and injuring law enforcement.

At least attempt to exhibit a little retrospection and self awareness.

 

[icanhelp1]

If that’s all you took away from his Memorial…

No wonder you Radicalized democrats are such a sad loony lot.

I bet the damage wasn't nearly the 2 billion dollars in damage from the BLM /ANTIFA riots.

 

[Bn2f]

I bet the damage wasn't nearly the 2 billion dollars in damage from the BLM /ANTIFA riots.

Hopefully, all you poor magats will match in donations to TPusa the imaginary 2b from blm rioters.