We are all Charlie.

[icanhelp1]

No valid ones that I am aware of. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to lie with impunity.

I remember a whole lot of noise about that from jerks like Gym Jordan, but that's it.

They weren't peacefully praying, they were blocking access to the clinics. Take it from someone who has actually been on the front lines of that battle, we know the difference between the ones who just stand there and pray and the ones who get in patients' faces, and it was not the former who were being targeted.

You're as bad as ducky. You only see what you want to see. Get a room with Laz, maybe he'll share his hallucinogenic drugs with you.

 

[YDB95]

You're as bad as ducky. You only see what you want to see. Get a room with Laz, maybe he'll share his hallucinogenic drugs with you.

I note without surprise that you don't even try to debunk any of my points. That figures.

 

[icanhelp1]

You are proving my point about not letting go of your bias. I predicted you would come back and continue to support Trump's claims even though the case is under appeal. And you did with vengeance, even after you just said let the chips fall where they may. You couldn't just let it go.

Blinded by the light... let it go, just be patient and let it run its course instead of heaping more fuel on the flames.

Between the two of us I'm the only one that's ever criticized my own party and Trump. You on the other hand have your head so far up Biden's ass I'm surprised you don't collapse from advanced hypoxia.

 

[Lazaran]

You are proving my point about not letting go of your bias. I predicted you would come back and continue to support Trump's claims even though the case is under appeal. And you did with vengeance, even after you just said let the chips fall where they may. You couldn't just let it go.

Blinded by the light... let it go, just be patient and let it run its course instead of heaping more fuel on the flames.

The main items in ineedhelp1’s & the other MAGAts’ supply shed are whitewash & gasoline (along with some dull tools & skeletons).

The MAGAts will never stop with their racist whitewashing or their inflammatory gaslighting



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[icanhelp1]

I note without surprise that you don't even try to debunk any of my points. That figures.

It's a waste of time. I remember your antics with dumpington. You're very good at minutiae , always trying to validate the exception over the rule.

You rail on Gym Jordan, but no one can refute the amount of compelling circumstantial evidence against Joe Biden. You gloss over the fact that Garland ran a protection racket around the Biden crime family. Now that Biden Pardoned his whole crime family they can't be prosecuted, at least so far. Don't run the bullshit that Hunter was charged, he was pardoned. IRS had Hunter dead nuts and Weiss let the statutes of limitation run out. IRS told to stand down.

 

[dmallord]

Your reading for comp is challenged. I wrote Trump campaigned on releasing the files and came up lame. I even chastised Bondi for her fuckup. As far as continuing legal issues stop pretending you know better cuz you don't.

You only see things through the prism of TDS.

The appellate court this and the appellate that. The case oozed impropriety. No other AG in the country would have brought them charges to court but because it was Trump any impropriety is OK with you. You didn't give a fuck about justice, your whole premise was get Trump and if you get him all is forgiven. That's your idea of justice. You love to write nice long smooth narratives, but if it's all bullshit, then don't waste your time.

What can I say... As always, you talk out of both sides of your mouth at the same time. TDS is an overworked trope, and is a standard go-to acquisition for your ilk. I'm not defined under that one in any way, shape, or form.

Your opinion on the AG in NY is fine. It's just as good as her opinion of Trump, also. She will not lose sleep over it, I suspect. You, on the other hand, seem very riled up over it. Neither of us can undo what is on its way to the appeals court. Your vilification isn't helping the matter here either.

Thanks for noting my narrative is smooth. Some here find my commentary cogent and well-crafted. I'm glad you appreciate the efforts I put forth in these posts. I wish more would do the same. As to bullshit, that's also an opinion; one not worthy of rebuttal at the moment. My thoughts stand firm against your claims every day and night. I pointed out errors in your statements, and you responded by vilifying me. How is that polite political discourse?

Question: Do you accept the content I posted that the case was not overturned? Is that what's bothering you? Did you err in your statement that is was overturned when it wasn't?

 

[jhenry922]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969824545151353183

A revival? In 5 months you won't hear any mention of this grifter's name. Just like who the fuck was that guy with the oh yeah Rush Limbaugh see how quickly he disappeared from the media?

 

[jhenry922]

It's a waste of time. I remember your antics with dumpington. You're very good at minutiae , always trying to validate the exception over the rule.

You rail on Gym Jordan, but no one can refute the amount of compelling circumstantial evidence against Joe Biden. You gloss over the fact that Garland ran a protection racket around the Biden crime family. Now that Biden Pardoned his whole crime family they can't be prosecuted, at least so far. Don't run the bullshit that Hunter was charged, he was pardoned. IRS had Hunter dead nuts and Weiss let the statutes of limitation run out. IRS told to stand down.

Which one of these presidents has had 43 convictions against him versus zero. Trump is the crime family and so is giuliani. You notice when juliani cracked down against Crime games in New York city, not one conviction was of the Russian mob. Curious isn't it? You know if you really want to be like Charlie you can all get shot in the neck.

 

[icanhelp1]

What can I say... As always, you talk out of both sides of your mouth at the same time. TDS is an overworked trope, and is a standard go-to acquisition for your ilk. I'm not defined under that one in any way, shape, or form.

Your opinion on the AG in NY is fine. It's just as good as her opinion of Trump, also. She will not lose sleep over it, I suspect. You, on the other hand, seem very riled up over it. Neither of us can undo what is on its way to the appeals court. Your vilification isn't helping the matter here either.

Thanks for noting my narrative is smooth. Some here find my commentary cogent and well-crafted. I'm glad you appreciate the efforts I put forth in these posts. I wish more would do the same. As to bullshit, that's also an opinion; one not worthy of rebuttal at the moment. My thoughts stand firm against your claims every day and night. I pointed out errors in your statements, and you responded by vilifying me. How is that polite political discourse?

Question: Do you accept the content I posted that the case was not overturned? Is that what's bothering you? Did you err in your statement that is was overturned when it wasn't?

My statement!!!

icanhelp1 said:
When those felony charges are overturned you and ducky are going to have a lot of crow to eat. "The fraud case went down in flames and James is NOW in the hot seat. KARMA"

Where did I say the case was overturned?

 

[dmallord]

Letitia James overreached, she tried to make a $5,000 misdemeanor charge into a half a billion dollars fine. The judge is just as responsible as James for going along with it. It exposed James as a conflicted ant-Trump AG. She brought shame to the NY judicial system which used to be the gold standard. Her and Bragg have made a laughing stock of NY's state's justice system. Now she's in the hot seat, just reinforces the narrative that democrats always accuse republicans for what they are doing behind the scenes.

I'm certain you believe this is so. A cooler head would say this is highly biased and inflammatory rhetoric at best. Neither Judge nor AG is in anyone's hot seat, just in the crosshairs of a president calling for his appointee, Bondi, to press charges against them at all costs. That's a flagrant misuse of the justice system for retribution, as Trump calls it.

You’ve actually confirmed my point, again. The appeals court didn’t “clear” Trump—liability for fraud was upheld. The ruling only reduced the penalty amount, citing the Eighth Amendment on excessive fines. The fraud itself remains on record, along with injunctions that restrict Trump and his sons from operating New York companies and a court-appointed monitor overseeing the Trump Organization. Judge Engoron, not James, determined the size of the fine, and the appeals court subsequently adjusted it. That’s not “collusion,” that’s the legal system doing exactly what it’s supposed to do: prosecutors bring cases, judges issue rulings, and appeals courts refine them. Fraud upheld isn’t the same thing as innocence. That a second tier of justice confirms the lower courts decisions, with modifications, adds more weight to the legitimacy of the NY Justice system. That you don't want it to do so is on you and your inability to accept the rule of law when it doesn't support your cause célèbre.

 

[dmallord]

Between the two of us I'm the only one that's ever criticized my own party and Trump. You on the other hand have your head so far up Biden's ass I'm surprised you don't collapse from advanced hypoxia.

Apparently, you haven't read all my posts. I'll let that slide; so you know, I have been critical of Biden and have made my views accordingly.

My posts remain, by and large, fact-based, and my opinions are stated with supported sources, most of the time.

 

[YDB95]

It's a waste of time.

Then maybe keep your mouth shut in the first place.

I remember your antics with dumpington.

If true, you remember he almost always cherrypicked out-of-context bits and pieces that fit what he wanted to believe, and never even acknowledged the big picture was there. But even he was better at backing up his arguments than you are, and that's saying a lot.

You're very good at minutiae , always trying to validate the exception over the rule.

Am I? Or does it just look that way to you because of all the misinformation you're steeped in? (In this very exchange, you threw in the usual nonsense about "the BLM/Antifa riots", 93% of which were peaceful protests. That's the very epitome of "validate the exception over the rule"!)

You rail on Gym Jordan, but no one can refute the amount of compelling circumstantial evidence against Joe Biden.

Not if there wasn't any real evidence, we can't.

You gloss over the fact that Garland ran a protection racket around the Biden crime family.

I'm sure this made perfect sense when Sean or Laura or whoever explained it, but...what?

Now that Biden Pardoned his whole crime family they can't be prosecuted, at least so far. Don't run the bullshit that Hunter was charged, he was pardoned. IRS had Hunter dead nuts and Weiss let the statutes of limitation run out. IRS told to stand down.

I'm aware of what Biden did for his son, and whether I agree with it or not, I'm also aware of the reason why. He was getting the book thrown at him for offenses that most first offenders would get off with only a fine or even community service, simply because of who his father was. Which doesn't mean you have to agree with what Biden did - I don't really like it myself - but as I always told Dumpington: context matters.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Where did I say the case was overturned?

When you tried to play fuck-fuck games and got caught, dipshit.

 

[AnomalyLady]

Charlie Kirk was a human being, entitled to the same inherent dignity and rights as all. I remain deeply perplexed by the controversy surrounding free speech- a fundamental liberty enshrined in the First Amendment- and the troubling notion that some would deny the right to life to those with whom they disagree.

If you believe that someone’s differing views justify their death, I challenge you to consider the consequences of such a world. Imagine a society where you openly share your location, knowing others might wish you harm for your beliefs. Would you feel safe? True freedom, including the right to speak freely, must coexist with the universal right to live- otherwise, no one is truly safe and secure.

 

[YDB95]

If you believe that someone’s differing views justify their death, I challenge you to consider the consequences of such a world. Imagine a society where you openly share your location, knowing others might wish you harm for your beliefs. Would you feel safe? True freedom, including the right to speak freely, must coexist with the universal right to live- otherwise, no one is truly safe and secure.

Although I agree with this, I think it is very important to keep in mind that people who are less than devastated by what happened to Kirk aren't feeling that way because of his views. They're feeling that way because he dedicated his life to sowing divisiveness and hate, and in fact to sharing his opponents' locations knowing some of his supporters definitely would wish them harm for their beliefs.

 

[schism666]

 

[AnomalyLady]

Although I agree with this, I think it is very important to keep in mind that people who are less than devastated by what happened to Kirk aren't feeling that way because of his views. They're feeling that way because he dedicated his life to sowing divisiveness and hate, and in fact to sharing his opponents' locations knowing some of his supporters definitely would wish them harm for their beliefs.

Doesn’t that all boil down to disagreeing with the other person? I think that is a dangerous way to live.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Doesn’t that all boil down to disagreeing with the other person? I think that is a dangerous way to live.

It was for charlie.

 

[YDB95]

Doesn’t that all boil down to disagreeing with the other person? I think that is a dangerous way to live.

No, it does not. There is a difference between disagreeing with another person and doxxing them.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

A revival? In 5 months you won't hear any mention of this grifter's name. Just like who the fuck was that guy with the oh yeah Rush Limbaugh see how quickly he disappeared from the media?

Speaking of him, have you seen the new ballroom's construction?

 

[icanhelp1]

Then maybe keep your mouth shut in the first place.

LOL

If true, you remember he almost always cherrypicked out-of-context bits and pieces that fit what he wanted to believe, and never even acknowledged the big picture was there. But even he was better at backing up his arguments than you are, and that's saying a lot

And so did you! And you still do. I’ve backed my assertions with facts, in criminal cases I’ve supported my assertions with statutory facts. I’m just tired of repeating myself.

.

Am I? Or does it just look that way to you because of all the misinformation you're steeped in? (In this very exchange, you threw in the usual nonsense about "the BLM/Antifa riots", 93% of which were peaceful protests. That's the very epitome of "validate the exception over the rule"!)

How can anyone quantify a riot, street violence. So, if 10 people are in a crowd, one pulls out a firearm and shoots somebody dead, you’re telling me that 90% was peaceful. How do you account for the aftermath, the businesses destroyed, the lives lost, the police officers injured. Do you have any idea how much damage that 7% can do. How bout 2 billion. George Floyd, a thug, resist arrest and loses his life because of drug overdose and all hell breaks loose. Charlie gets assassinated and nothing but peaceful vigils. 100% peaceful. Why can I say that? because there were no riots. Those numbers can be accurately quantified. That 93% number you state is a phony made up media number which doesn’t accurately reflect the reality of what happened. It sounds good, look good but it doesn’t add up. The only reason you believe in those numbers has to be because you’re OK with violence to to an end. In your mind the ends justify the means and besides it was 93% peaceful. What a load of steaming crap.

Not if there wasn't any real evidence, we can't.

There was real evidence, it was covered up by a corrupt AG. Criminal referrals were made but! You know the drill. SARS reports, financial documentation, witness testimony, all buried by Garland and the DOJ. Now that evidence is inadmissible, I wonder why.

I'm sure this made perfect sense when Sean or Laura or whoever explained it, but...what?

Top lawyer, assistant AG, name escapes me, but she told Weiss to stand down. The IRS has evidence that would have tied Joe Biden to Hunter’s criminal activities with China, Russia, and Ukraine. There’s a reason why Biden wanted Shokin fired. I sourced all those allegations. Trump’s phone call with Zelensky ended up with an impeachment, why? Because Trump was spot on with the Biden crime family’s criminal racket.

I'm aware of what Biden did for his son, and whether I agree with it or not, I'm also aware of the reason why. He was getting the book thrown at him for offenses that most first offenders would get off with only a fine or even community service, simply because of who his father was. Which doesn't mean you have to agree with what Biden did - I don't really like it myself - but as I always told Dumpington: context matters.

Bullshit, he was charged and plead guilty for a 9 count indictment 3 of which were tax felonies and six misdemeanors tax offenses. Joe pardoned him in his special way, and his family to ensure criminal charges couldn’t be levied against the Don (head of the crime family himself). Like usual you lie by omission.

 

[RoryN]

I’ve supported my assertions with statutory facts.

Your kind supports lots of things that are "statutory".

Also, you're a racist:

I wonder if it's all those black daddies living by the 4 fs ( find them, feel them, fuck them, forget them ).

Post in thread 'The real badbabysitter finally revealed..' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/the-real-badbabysitter-finally-revealed.1504564/post-90980000

blacks have a higher propensity of violence than all races combined.

Post in thread 'If America Is Racist, Why Have Millions of Blacks Emigrated Here?' https://forum.literotica.com/thread...f-blacks-emigrated-here.1547263/post-93907526

I find that African Americans are more racist than white folks...I wouldn’t even think of walking a predominately black neighborhood, wouldn’t end well.

Post in thread 'White Officers in Minority Communities' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/white-officers-in-minority-communities.1525284/post-92435953

 

[AnomalyLady]

It was for charlie.

Hmm?

 

[schism666]

 

[AnomalyLady]

No, it does not. There is a difference between disagreeing with another person and doxxing them.

I re-read what you said. I do understand what you are saying. I am glad you agree with most of what I am saying.