What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn't say that. I have said the President's policies have prolonged the recession and damn well might drive us headlong into another. He is flat out ideologically opposed to fiscal policies that might rescue the economy from further slide.

Low ten year bond yields have more to do with the value of our currency and the amount of it the government is already holding. When the supply of anything is great against the demand the price falls.

Just look at pension plans, most with typical allocations are 60% equities and 40% bonds. Performance between equities and bonds just this month shows bonds down 8% stocks down 7%, that's roughly a 15% swing on 60% of your portfolio meaning the funded ratio of your protfolio is down 9%. So do you think those fund managers are going take a look at that ratio and buy more bonds? Damn straight, but what is the effect of more bond purchases? The effect is even lower bond yields in the future.

You see where the fed ben buying treasury bonds last few weeks.
if that interest rate spikes we are fucked.
 
Obama lover's why hadn't gas come down 86 dollars a barrel gas around 3.50:confused:
Notice white house stop talking about this move along nothing to see here:D
 
You see the idiot Jay Carney trying to explain Obama's green energy is different then Romney
it's priceless:D
 
Morbidly Obese Troll Slobber isle 5!!!

Dow's worst month in 2 years.
Performance of the Dow Jones industrial average by month this year:

Dec. 30, 2011, close: 12,217.56.
— January: Up 415.35 points.
— February: Up 319.16 points.
— March: Up 259.97 points.
— April: Up 1.59 points.
— May: Down 820.18 points.
Thursday’s close: 12,393.45.

Still up from year's end.
 
Here's the problem with your argument, and in general with your logic.

You provide your hypothesis that your argument is true, and then go on to ramble on with the rest of your post, as if your hypothesis is true, without actually providing any evidence to back it up.

I realize that this is the result of home-schooling, so I can't fault you completely, but seriously....

books, not blogs.

The evidence is clear to see in Hitler's 25 points which I am going to assume that you did not bother to even read. The Left has told itself so many times that Hitler was a right-winger that it has become fact, but it is fiction. The right-wing was comprised of the Monarchists, everyone else was an admirer of the German Social State and were merely fighting for the spoils of plunder for their own particular constituency.

I do have to wonder if modern Socialists, like their counterparts of the past, cannot hold a discussion without denigrating everyone outside of their own little consensus.

Hindenburg was the right wing, not Hitler...

"Though Hindenburg ran during the second round of the elections as a non-party independent, he was generally regarded as the conservative candidate."
Wiki

As for Books, not Blogs, I listed the four authors whose books go into great detail on this subject.
 
The above post is a classic example of my little bitch AJ attempting to have it both ways. The situational Native American is speakin' with forked tongue once again.

For starters, this is an instant classic...


The above is my little bitch AJ actually AGREEING with me about the primary tenet of my post, namely, there is NO objective proof to back up the Vettebirther's specious claim that millionaires are moving out of state to avoid taxation. Note, however, that my little bitch AJ is framing it in a way to make it appear that I'm somehow incorrect.

Now, let's move the goalposts a bit and apply a specious conclusion:


Actually, the article I linked to shows nothing of the sort...and my little bitch AJ supplies his own (completely unsupported) conclusion.

Now let's watch my little bitch AJ put words in someone else's mouth:


The author of the piece speculates that weather might have more to do with millionaire emigration than tax policy. My little bitch AJ then claims that since California has good weather, the author's speculation is therefore invalid for the entire United States! DERP!

Notice how my little bitch AJ makes a grandiose claim about California millionaire emigration but fails to provide data to back up his claim? She's hoping you didn't notice!



The blog notes that there is absolutely NO research to back up either Vetteman's OR the Tax Foundation's claims about millionaire emigration, but my little bitch AJ tries to take me and the blog to task for failing to document the research that there is no research in scholarly journals. Huh?



This whole discussion has been about millionaires moving from one state to another state to avoid taxation. My little bitch AJ knows that she has been dealt a losing hand, so she tries to redefine the discussion to country to country migration...and declare victory!

You link points out that high taxation forces a migration away from it and then tries to purport that because the very richest don't run that high taxes have no effect upon an economy. Even Keynes never went that far off the ledge...
 
Obama and his sycophants continue with the fantasy, backed up with "hairy math" (that's fuzzy squared) that an improving economy is before our eyes.:rolleyes:

Is the president responsible for the state of the economy?

If he's Bush he is.

If he's Obama, then it's still Bush.

We rw idiots get that part of the argument. ;) ;)

What Democrats want to seriously avoid is a conversation about who controlled Congress during the various ups and downs...
 
They Kant handle the truth.

*points and laughs at my little bitch AJ.

Speaking of bein' unable to handle the truth, it's now been one solid week since you tucked tail and ran like the cowardly dog that you are away from the Julia thread.

All hat and no cattle, as they say around these parts.
 
0521-fed_full_600.jpg


"Today’s release of the Chicago Federal Reserve National Activity Index (CFNAI) showed improvement for the national economy with the index increasing from last month to stand at 0.11 while the three month moving average also declined to -0.06."

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Paper-Economy/2012/0521/Chicago-Fed-US-economy-improving



"And the answer is yeah, things are getting a little better in a lot of places in this country" - Mitt Romney

"the Fed's policy-making committee said although oil and gasoline prices have risen lately, it expects the increase to have only a short-term effect on inflation. The committee expects moderate economic growth over coming quarters and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline gradually" toward normal levels, the Fed said."


http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2012-03-13/federal-reserve-meeting/53506980/1

How old is that information?

Do you understand anything at all about Praxeology?
 
You need better analytical skills dear. I will leave you with this to play with. There is no greater economic fear for the future than money flowing into 10 year treasuries that pay less than the rate of inflation. Do you understand what that might mean?

Im going to give you a pass and assume you dont know how patronizing that sounds. But if you pat me on the head and tell me to fetch you a cup of coffee I may have to go angry female on you.

We have to assume, then, that you do not know what that means.
 
Performance of the Dow Jones industrial average by month this year:

Dec. 30, 2011, close: 12,217.56.
— January: Up 415.35 points.
— February: Up 319.16 points.
— March: Up 259.97 points.
— April: Up 1.59 points.
— May: Down 820.18 points.
Thursday’s close: 12,393.45.

Still up from year's end.

Still a far cry from the jubilation of, what just a scant five, six weeks ago, when the economy finally turned the corner and the market's climb to over 13K was the harbinger of reelection...

;) ;)

I pulled my loose change out at a very good time.

Do you people not understand the forces of uncertainty and the promises of higher taxes on economic activity?
 
If he's Bush he is.

If he's Obama, then it's still Bush.

We rw idiots get that part of the argument. ;) ;)

What Democrats want to seriously avoid is a conversation about who controlled Congress during the various ups and downs...

When you start talkin' about who "controlled" Congress don't forget to factor in 60-vote supermajorities. Oops, you forgot, didn't you? DERP!
 
My little bitch is a MARKET TIMER!

Simply wow!

Futures down about a hundred right now...

:eek:

We might hit that magical psychological 12K mark!

But that's okay, right my little bitch?
You got out of the market at the toppermost of the poppermost, and now the AJ portfolio is safely invested in gold! AMIRIGHT?
 
You seem to think a keyboard and distance makes you tough as well as rudeness making you erudite...



:eek: What's your explanation for the Obama economy? Bush?


Sideshow Barry Barker 2012 Says: "It's NOT the economy, Stupid!" It's the Birthers! The Tea Party! SARAH PALIN!
Bush!
BAD LUCK!!
RACISM!!!
ATMs, KIOSKs & CORPORATE JETS!!!
TSUNAMIS, TORNADOS, & the ARAB SPRING!!!
EARTHQUAKES & HURRICANES!!!!!
EUROPE’s €PIIGS!!!!!!!!

OBSTRUCTION!!!
Americans have grown “Soft!”
MY LIMP STAFF
Greece is the word!
Roman Noodles!
Iran and the Jews!
You're all LAZY!
Come on WORK WITH ME HERE!
I killed a lot of people people!

obama-wide-grin80.jpg

”’Shovel-ready’ was not as shovel-ready as we expected.” (Laughter)





... telephone operators...,


... the Internet...


Bush...

That wasn't me that gave drone technology to Iran!


Those Inscrutable Chinese!
 
ROMNEY-MENTUM RT @beckyquickcnbc: Monthly jobs report shows gain of 69k jobs, vs. estimates of 150-155k. Unemployment rate is 8.2%:rolleyes:


I know

Lets talk

SWEATERS

DOGS

ROCKS

HAIRCUTS

and of course

HORSES
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top