- - - - If your story idea is so big that it doesn't seem to fit anywhere in any format, what would YOU do with it? - - - -
I am sure everyone here has jotted down a few notes about a scene, and have seen it slowly grow into something larger. A simple stroke story begs for a second chapter. Characters get a hold on the author or the audience. Backstories emerge unasked for. A series begins to take shape. A little momentum becomes a slippery slope.
Soon your silly little 'notion' is bigger than you'd ever planned on it being, and IT is pulling you around by the leash it has firmly attached to YOUR wrist. Often taking you places you hadn't planned on going, and sucking up all the resources you need for other stories and real life, like some rogue Black Hole wandering thru your personal solar system.
So what then?
If you accept that your 'larger' than planned for story SHOULD or MUST be told?
How would you handle it?
< < < < > > > >
I have gone down the 'Try to post one chapter a month" route before.
That has a lot to offer both the reader and the writer. Feedback and continual improvements can happen that way for the Author. Readers get a regular dose of the story. Most of the times there is 'enough' sex in each 'episode' to keep everyone happy. Longer stories don't have to languish unseen on a computer for months or years. Motivational lapses get solved with the pressure to keep on schedule.
The downsides to releasing a long work that way are often a little less obvious.
Often truly interesting plot opportunities are lost. The previous storyline is set in stone, fixed firmly in the readers minds. Errors in direction are locked in. There is a great deal of stress, always writing with an 'eye on the past' to make sure 'things fit' with the old universe. New ideas for the story and characters get dampened down, because they no longer 'fit the starting category' well enough. The episodic nature of the work makes any idea of rereleasing it as a true novel impossible, because the rhythm of it's creation has made it too choppy.
The opposite approach has its own issues.
Writing in a total vacuum is hard for some authors, and absolutely impossible for others. Without at least one other viewpoint getting a chance to make criticisms and suggestions, the 'hidden story' can often lose its way. Get muddled in a morass of unnecessary details. Or important thoughts are left out, because the writer is 'assuming' that his absent audience can leap over the obviously missing clues. Motivation to continue can wane, and entire projects can get abandoned. Hope of it ever getting finished can turn to despair.
Even if you are lucky enough to get a few loyal and talented Pre-Readers, and other Authors, to become partners in being an early Screen Test audience? Eventually the long slog thru an entire novel can weigh you down.
< < < < > > > >
I am tending to think about this kind of analogy in a more detailed way these days:
The writing for a traditional daily or weekly "Soap Opera" series, blockbuster movies with the inevitable followup "Sequels", long involved well planned "Multiverse" franchises, books turned into years worth of "Mini-Movies" on pay channels, and the "One-Off" epic story that stands alone never to be added to or expanded by anyone.
Regardless of your feelings about George Lucas and his many works, these days the independent fans who grew up with his characters have picked up the ball and are carrying it forward for him. Movies, mini-series, animated shows. Sure he is still at the helm, but the drive is someday going to continue without his input. The recent mega sale of his entire franchise should take care of that problem, although the future quality might eventually suffer.
The same could be said with Stan Lee, and I do miss his little 'cameos' in the movies. Or someone like Agatha Christie, whose estate continues to fight to keep modern "garbage movies" from ruining her legacy. Or how Tolkien would view his works being 'chopped up' into six epics for a wider but often mostly illiterate audience.
< < < < > > > >
How would YOU approach your OWN Big Idea?
Never start it? Play around the edges? Explore a few characters at a time? Create a web of smaller 'interlinked' stories? Release little 'mini-series' to keep the weight of the story from dragging you down?
Or are you okay with NOT giving into pressure, telling your complete story well, and let the reader's deal with their own 'selfish' issues in their own way?
Would you butcher a good narrative into smaller digestible chunks, with so much recap and filler to give everyone heartburn? Or struggle on alone just hoping you will have the chance to complete the hidden solo effort? That it will one day find an audience, and not have to be a year's worth of work on some poor editor's computer, as they struggle to fix the repetitive and easily avoidable mistakes of a literary recluse?
With so much effort and personal anguish going into a project, should you be writing such a tale with the constant idea of an eventual sale?
< < < < > > > >
For some authors this will be a ridiculous thread.
For others, it could be one last warning sign about a murky and dangerous path they are already well along. I know that some here on this forum have already ran smack dab into the monster that lurks at the end of this road.
Some have run away screaming, others have fought and died in place, while a few won their battles and made their own choices about the fate of their 'little' world that grew out of control.
I am sure everyone here has jotted down a few notes about a scene, and have seen it slowly grow into something larger. A simple stroke story begs for a second chapter. Characters get a hold on the author or the audience. Backstories emerge unasked for. A series begins to take shape. A little momentum becomes a slippery slope.
Soon your silly little 'notion' is bigger than you'd ever planned on it being, and IT is pulling you around by the leash it has firmly attached to YOUR wrist. Often taking you places you hadn't planned on going, and sucking up all the resources you need for other stories and real life, like some rogue Black Hole wandering thru your personal solar system.
So what then?
If you accept that your 'larger' than planned for story SHOULD or MUST be told?
How would you handle it?
< < < < > > > >
I have gone down the 'Try to post one chapter a month" route before.
That has a lot to offer both the reader and the writer. Feedback and continual improvements can happen that way for the Author. Readers get a regular dose of the story. Most of the times there is 'enough' sex in each 'episode' to keep everyone happy. Longer stories don't have to languish unseen on a computer for months or years. Motivational lapses get solved with the pressure to keep on schedule.
The downsides to releasing a long work that way are often a little less obvious.
Often truly interesting plot opportunities are lost. The previous storyline is set in stone, fixed firmly in the readers minds. Errors in direction are locked in. There is a great deal of stress, always writing with an 'eye on the past' to make sure 'things fit' with the old universe. New ideas for the story and characters get dampened down, because they no longer 'fit the starting category' well enough. The episodic nature of the work makes any idea of rereleasing it as a true novel impossible, because the rhythm of it's creation has made it too choppy.
The opposite approach has its own issues.
Writing in a total vacuum is hard for some authors, and absolutely impossible for others. Without at least one other viewpoint getting a chance to make criticisms and suggestions, the 'hidden story' can often lose its way. Get muddled in a morass of unnecessary details. Or important thoughts are left out, because the writer is 'assuming' that his absent audience can leap over the obviously missing clues. Motivation to continue can wane, and entire projects can get abandoned. Hope of it ever getting finished can turn to despair.
Even if you are lucky enough to get a few loyal and talented Pre-Readers, and other Authors, to become partners in being an early Screen Test audience? Eventually the long slog thru an entire novel can weigh you down.
< < < < > > > >
I am tending to think about this kind of analogy in a more detailed way these days:
The writing for a traditional daily or weekly "Soap Opera" series, blockbuster movies with the inevitable followup "Sequels", long involved well planned "Multiverse" franchises, books turned into years worth of "Mini-Movies" on pay channels, and the "One-Off" epic story that stands alone never to be added to or expanded by anyone.
Regardless of your feelings about George Lucas and his many works, these days the independent fans who grew up with his characters have picked up the ball and are carrying it forward for him. Movies, mini-series, animated shows. Sure he is still at the helm, but the drive is someday going to continue without his input. The recent mega sale of his entire franchise should take care of that problem, although the future quality might eventually suffer.
The same could be said with Stan Lee, and I do miss his little 'cameos' in the movies. Or someone like Agatha Christie, whose estate continues to fight to keep modern "garbage movies" from ruining her legacy. Or how Tolkien would view his works being 'chopped up' into six epics for a wider but often mostly illiterate audience.
< < < < > > > >
How would YOU approach your OWN Big Idea?
Never start it? Play around the edges? Explore a few characters at a time? Create a web of smaller 'interlinked' stories? Release little 'mini-series' to keep the weight of the story from dragging you down?
Or are you okay with NOT giving into pressure, telling your complete story well, and let the reader's deal with their own 'selfish' issues in their own way?
Would you butcher a good narrative into smaller digestible chunks, with so much recap and filler to give everyone heartburn? Or struggle on alone just hoping you will have the chance to complete the hidden solo effort? That it will one day find an audience, and not have to be a year's worth of work on some poor editor's computer, as they struggle to fix the repetitive and easily avoidable mistakes of a literary recluse?
With so much effort and personal anguish going into a project, should you be writing such a tale with the constant idea of an eventual sale?
< < < < > > > >
For some authors this will be a ridiculous thread.
For others, it could be one last warning sign about a murky and dangerous path they are already well along. I know that some here on this forum have already ran smack dab into the monster that lurks at the end of this road.
Some have run away screaming, others have fought and died in place, while a few won their battles and made their own choices about the fate of their 'little' world that grew out of control.
Last edited: