policywank
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 2,775
Obviously you didn't read the point. Taking a cut does not make them like a pimp - repeating the same flawed premise won't make the point valid. Taking a share of revenue or profits is a legitimate form of compensation for services rendered in many business arrangements. It is a form of risk and reward sharing that is a legitimate alternative to a fixed fee for service.
Definition of pimp:
: a person who is associated with, usually exerts control over, and lives off the earnings of one or more prostitutes and/or sex industry
Exactly. The defining feature of the pimp isn't that he takes a cut but that he does so through coercion and force (and also arguably the fact that he does so while offering nothing of value).
The relationship between OF and the people that use the platform is more analogous to the relationship between a personal trainer and the gym. The personal trainer is essentially a free lancer who earns fees from clients and pays a cut to the gym in return for the use of their facility and equipment. Or the relationship between a real estate agent and the brokerage they work for. The agent earns commissions and pays a cut to the brokerage for the use of their branding, marketing and access to multiple listing service. Or the agent who takes a cut of an athlete's or actor's earnings in return for management and representation services.
In each case the party taking "a cut" is doing so in return for offering access to a platform or a service that has real value. Likewise in each case the party giving up "a cut' of their revenue is doing so of their own free will because they see value in what they are receiving. And the decision to compensate one party with "a cut" rather than a fixed or other fee structure is a legitimate business arrangement arrived at by two parties, neither acting under duress or being coerced or controlled.
Now if one wants to use the word pimp in this circumstance because of the engagement in the sex industry that is a different debate. But the premise that the word applies because the compensation comes in the form of "a cut" doesn't hold up at all.