How OnlyFans, Fansly and other pay sites have ruined everything...

[IARainman]

I don’t begrudge anyone using what they have to make a buck if that’s what they want to do. I don’t buy porn, sex, whatever but there’s obviously a market that’s being catered to. I continue to find plenty of people to interact with who are not in any business pursuit, so I don’t think anything’s ruined.

 

[Errorusernametaken]

The whole assertion of entitlement belies an illogical set of underlying assumptions. People sell all sorts of content online and elsewhere. No doubt there is a range of opinions on the varying level of quality of that content. But is a free and open marketplace it is each content creator's right to decide the price of their content and each consumer's right to decide if they will pay that price. Why would selling some types of content indicate a sense of entitlement while selling other types of content would not? Unless off course the consumer making that assertion feels entitled to free content or entitled to decide which content others should value.

This is a whole lot of words to say not very much.

I don't know how many there are on here, but in my experience the only things that appear to match the pomposity of pseudo intellectuals are a) the degree to which they are wrong, b) the stridency with which they declare their verbiage, and c) the resentment they feel to being challenged. However, nine times out of ten, when you strip away the bombast, you usually find they've passive aggressively tacked onto someone's else's misunderstanding, in a fit of pique.

TLDR: Empty cans rattle the loudest.

 

[KatieDoes]

"I don't understand"

This.

You've now created a rabbit hole that you expect me to follow along, (expending my own time and energy for no benefit) to rectify your misunderstandings. wilful or otherwise? Sorry, you're not worth it to me.

All I will say is calm down. Not everybody is out to get you or hostile, honestly. From what I can see your perception skills are lacking, so if you do think somethings wrong, its likely you've got the wrong end of the stick.

You strike me as someone that likes to have the last word, so please feel free to have it. And a great weekend!

Bless your heart


You: ‘I think you are one’
Me ‘ I am one, what? Can you clarify that?’
You: Blahblahblah I‘m a weak man and need to speak dismissively to women when I get called out on my poor communication skills blahblahblah


You poor simple fool. Just say that you aren’t able to clarify and move along. Your lack of communication skills aren’t my problem to solve.

 

[SlutAddicted]

This is a whole lot of words to say not very much.

I don't know how many there are on here, but in my experience the only things that appear to match the pomposity of pseudo intellectuals are a) the degree to which they are wrong, b) the stridency with which they declare their verbiage, and c) the resentment they feel to being challenged. However, nine times out of ten, when you strip away the bombast, you usually find they've passive aggressively tacked onto someone's else's misunderstanding, in a fit of pique.

TLDR: Empty cans rattle the loudest.

Lol. I assume that you are speaking to yourself. In that context I agree with your assessment.

 

[policywank]

This is a whole lot of words to say not very much.

I don't know how many there are on here, but in my experience the only things that appear to match the pomposity of pseudo intellectuals are a) the degree to which they are wrong, b) the stridency with which they declare their verbiage, and c) the resentment they feel to being challenged. However, nine times out of ten, when you strip away the bombast, you usually find they've passive aggressively tacked onto someone's else's misunderstanding, in a fit of pique.

TLDR: Empty cans rattle the loudest.

Clear and logically consistent = bombast and pseudo intellectualism? Only for people who prefer not to think.

 

[Errorusernametaken]

Clear and logically consistent = bombast and pseudo intellectualism? Only for people who prefer not to think.

Loool thanks for proving my point - or at least half of it!