MrPixel
Just a Regular Guy
- Joined
- May 12, 2020
- Posts
- 4,711
Senate candidate JD Vance (R-OH) and Paul Gosar (R-AZ) have made statements in the past couple of days that they seek to ban pornography. There is at least one sitting Senator, Josh Hawley (R-MO), who has this objective as well, although he is more circumspect about his views overall since they would invite pushback, as he strongly advocates what amounts to a conservative Catholic theocracy.
What would you do if Literotica vanished? And all other sexually-explicit media? Then a high-tech law enforcement arm was created to snoop around your computers and bedrooms in search of "illicit" materials. How about Chinese-like censorship of the Internet? Not so far-fetched should these ass-bites get traction in the name of "protecting our children".
Larry Flynt is no longer around to advocate for the right to possess and view sexually-explicit material. So who is? Standing-up to anti-porn interests is inherently risky - who among us is willing to make the "I support the right to have porn" argument in front of their city council? Or a Congressional hearing? I wouldn't; I'd be a pariah and find me and my family's existence made miserable by the crackpots.
Would it go underground? Of course. Would the average US porn consumer understand the reach of the burgeoning AI dragnet? Nope. Many lives would be destroyed until the public got fed-up with it. From direct experience with similar legislation, it would be 20-30 years before the ship was righted.
The solution, right now, is to vote these bastards and their ilk out of office. They are not acting in your interests. None of these fascists are. Be careful who you pull that lever for.
What would you do if Literotica vanished? And all other sexually-explicit media? Then a high-tech law enforcement arm was created to snoop around your computers and bedrooms in search of "illicit" materials. How about Chinese-like censorship of the Internet? Not so far-fetched should these ass-bites get traction in the name of "protecting our children".
Larry Flynt is no longer around to advocate for the right to possess and view sexually-explicit material. So who is? Standing-up to anti-porn interests is inherently risky - who among us is willing to make the "I support the right to have porn" argument in front of their city council? Or a Congressional hearing? I wouldn't; I'd be a pariah and find me and my family's existence made miserable by the crackpots.
Would it go underground? Of course. Would the average US porn consumer understand the reach of the burgeoning AI dragnet? Nope. Many lives would be destroyed until the public got fed-up with it. From direct experience with similar legislation, it would be 20-30 years before the ship was righted.
The solution, right now, is to vote these bastards and their ilk out of office. They are not acting in your interests. None of these fascists are. Be careful who you pull that lever for.