Hey moderators - AI DIDN'T WRITE MY SHIT! I JUST HAVE GOOD GRAMMAR

I’d be very interested in knowing what they’re checking for. I’ve published 58 stories and only had two sent back. One was a very early work and my paragraphs were pages long. The other intimated a character had been sexually abused as a child. Both understandable within the rules. My recent stories are very clean from a grammar perspective. Maybe it’s my history, or perhaps it’s something else.

Like I said, I’d like to know what the AI check looks for. I tried it once to help generate an outline for a longer story. Total crap.
No one knows how or what neural net AIs learn from their training set, we know only that they learn. If neural network AI is used to train the detectors, similarly, no one knows what they detect, simply that there's a list of unarticulatable 'things' they learn that are more common in AI-generated text than HI-generated text. Inevitably, some humans have a style of writing text.
 
Last edited:
And if AI detectors aren't being used, no one knows what criteria Laurel uses.
No one knows how or what neural net AIs learn from their training set, we know only that they learn. If neural network AI is used to train the detectors, similarly, no one knows what they detect, simply that there's a list of unarticulatable 'things' they learn that are more common in AI-generated text than HI-generated text. Inevitably, some humans have a style of writingtext
 
Maybe I'm old fashioned but I doubt swearing and complaining on this board will win over the moderator. A simple and polite explanation to Laurel using the Conversations icon in the upper right portion of your screen will probably generate a far faster and more acceptable response.
This hasn't worked for anyone facing this problem. The site doesn't care, period.
 
And if AI detectors aren't being used, no one knows what criteria Laurel uses.
If Laurel has a sufficient training set and Manu is prepared to train her, she can learn to discriminate between AI-generated text and HI-generated text with the same degree of accuracy as an AI detector. AI neural nets and the human brain both learn in the same way.
 
You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land where venting in a forum will magically contact the site managers who will immediately prostrate themselves before you and sort out all your woes. That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone! You unlock this door with the key of imagination.
 
And neither one can be certain of what's human writing and what isn't. However, if writing contains high numbers of seemingly AI-generated content, I'd have to say, IMHO, the writer needs to change their style.
If Laurel has a sufficient training set and Manu is prepared to train her, she can learn to discriminate between AI-generated text and HI-generated text with the same degree of accuracy as an AI detector. AI neural nets and the human brain both learn in the same way.
 
The way I can tell if something is AI is when the same concept is repeated but only paraphrased slightly differently, again and again, through most paragraphs. It's so common I see this structure:

I love Christmas, it's my favourite time of year. The snow and presents and music are all so nice. Christmas is my favourite time of the year. I can't wait until the twenty-fifth!

See how sentence one and sentence three are the same? I see if in every single thing AI written.
 
I repeat shit, but not usually in the paragraph unless it's a mistake.
The way I can tell if something is AI is when the same concept is repeated but only paraphrased slightly differently, again and again, through most paragraphs. It's so common I see this structure:

I love Christmas, it's my favourite time of year. The snow and presents and music are all so nice. Christmas is my favourite time of the year. I can't wait until the twenty-fifth!

See how sentence one and sentence three are the same? I see if in every single thing AI written.
 
The way I can tell if something is AI is when the same concept is repeated but only paraphrased slightly differently, again and again, through most paragraphs. It's so common I see this structure:

I love Christmas, it's my favourite time of year. The snow and presents and music are all so nice. Christmas is my favourite time of the year. I can't wait until the twenty-fifth!

See how sentence one and sentence three are the same? I see if in every single thing AI written.
I held his cock in my hand and began to stroke. I clenched my fist and moved it up and down. His eyes closed as I jerked him harder. Now I flicked my wrist, increasing my speed, as I gripped his shaft tighter.

— © ChatEMILY
 
Maybe I'm old fashioned but I doubt swearing and complaining on this board will win over the moderator. A simple and polite explanation to Laurel using the Conversations icon in the upper right portion of your screen will probably generate a far faster and more acceptable response.
This hasn't worked for anyone facing this problem. The site doesn't care, period.
I am impressed you are privy to each and every communication between writers and the moderator(s) about this issue and that there has never been a reasonable resolution of the concern.
I dare say the odds, while perhaps not great, of achieving success are better with direct communication than with simple complaining on the AH.
 
I held his cock in my hand and began to stroke. I clenched my fist and moved it up and down. His eyes closed as I jerked him harder. Now I flicked my wrist, increasing my speed, as I gripped his shaft tighter.

— © ChatEMILY
To be fair, the action sounds quite robotic. Like if the Terminator got stuck in the 1980s and had to make a living turning tricks.
 
Wasn't there an 80s parody of The Terminator called The Penetrator?

(The 80s had some great porn parody names. When Cliffhanger was popular, I read about a porn flick called Clitbanger.)
 
I always thought it sounded like someone couldn't aim properly.
Jack Black probably wrote a song about it.

"You don't always have to fuck her clit, sometimes you can fuck her meat socket instead"

perffectionism.jpg
 
For a while I was in-house at a law firm. By the coffee machine was a painting that was almost the spitting image of the God Sithrak (without the nails in his eyes). Cracked me up every morning.

Sithrak
The bull in a penis suit
The lesbian ice queen
Cum sprites

I'm owed several new ribs by the writer.
 
Back
Top