Lorilei
prude
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Posts
- 24,530
Where have I said that it is OK to take advantage of drunk people? No where.
We came upon this subject because Sean said that all drunk sex is rape and so therefore every adult he knows has been the victim and perpetrator of rape. I think this is absurd. I don't think two people who share a bottle of wine together and then have sex are raping each other. Not in the legal sense and not in the moral sense. You seem to disagree with me and think that this is technically rape in the legal sense, but not in the moral sense. But because I disagree with your legal interpretation, you now inexplicably suppose that I must condone behavior that would be clearly exploitative.
In high school I had sex with a big girl that I wouldn't have had sex with had I been sober. She had made advances toward me in the past when we were both sober, and I had said no thanks. The night we had sex, she was basically sober (was a designated driver) and I was extremely drunk (was throwing up the next morning). I didn't tell anyone what happened because I was embarrassed, and because I didn't want the very hot girl I had recently started dating to find out about it. But the big girl didn't keep quiet, and before long everyone knew about it. My girlfriend dumped me, slapped me, and berated me in front of everyone at school for cheating on her with a fat cow. My friends thought it was hilarious, and had a jolly time making fun of me for losing a hot girl because I cheated on her with an ugly one. I was the Hugh Grant of my high school. Obviously, it was extremely hurtful to the big girl when it came back to her that people were making fun of me for having sex with her. She was also hurt that I hadn't said a word to her since the night we had sex.
So was I raped according to California law? Not the way I interpret it. My judgment was impaired, but it wasn't impaired to the point where I couldn't comprehend what was happening. But if California law, when properly interpreted, would make me the victim of rape in this situation then it is a stupid fucking law. I was the asshole, not the victim.
It never even crossed my mind that I may have been the victim of rape. But that's because I'm not a female who has been indoctrinated by feminazi propaganda. In college, I found myself in an almost identical circumstance. Except this time, it was my feminist girlfriend who got drunk and cheated on me. When I found out about it and confronted her, she played the "rape" card. My initial instinct was to believe her, but as she was explaining what happened I realized she had the same fucked up idea of what it means to be raped as some of the people in this thread. She wasn't raped. She just willfully had sex with a "loser" that she never would have fucked had she been sober, and calling it rape was a way to absolve herself of responsibility. The guy she had sex with had also been drinking. When I asked her if this means she also raped him she said NO, because he would have had sex with her even if he was sober. By the end of the conversation, she realized "rape" wasn't the right word to describe what had happened, but still expected me to accept that she was somehow a victim in the situation. I dumped her and berated her, but didn't slap her.
Is this why you hate women and think you should be allowed to murder one?
The idiotic kind
Well, hello there, haven't seen you in a while!
For every man falsely accused a dozen actual rapists get away with the crime either because the court decided she was "asking for it" or the girl was to afraid to go to the police because......the court would tell everyone they would ask for it.
What I am 100% sure of is the only people I would like to kill are men like you.
Now go back to masturbating to rape porn you piece of shit then suck off your boyfriend LJ.
This can't be emphasized enough. And a dozen is most likely a gross understatement.