Guys, Would You Kill a Woman Who Falsely Accused You of Rape?

Would you kill the bitch?

  • Yes. I'd kill the bitch.

    Votes: 4 26.7%
  • No. Killing the bitch would be morally wrong.

    Votes: 6 40.0%
  • No. I would feel morally justified in killing the bitch, but the risks outweigh the rewards.

    Votes: 5 33.3%

  • Total voters
    15
Where have I said that it is OK to take advantage of drunk people? No where.

We came upon this subject because Sean said that all drunk sex is rape and so therefore every adult he knows has been the victim and perpetrator of rape. I think this is absurd. I don't think two people who share a bottle of wine together and then have sex are raping each other. Not in the legal sense and not in the moral sense. You seem to disagree with me and think that this is technically rape in the legal sense, but not in the moral sense. But because I disagree with your legal interpretation, you now inexplicably suppose that I must condone behavior that would be clearly exploitative.

In high school I had sex with a big girl that I wouldn't have had sex with had I been sober. She had made advances toward me in the past when we were both sober, and I had said no thanks. The night we had sex, she was basically sober (was a designated driver) and I was extremely drunk (was throwing up the next morning). I didn't tell anyone what happened because I was embarrassed, and because I didn't want the very hot girl I had recently started dating to find out about it. But the big girl didn't keep quiet, and before long everyone knew about it. My girlfriend dumped me, slapped me, and berated me in front of everyone at school for cheating on her with a fat cow. My friends thought it was hilarious, and had a jolly time making fun of me for losing a hot girl because I cheated on her with an ugly one. I was the Hugh Grant of my high school. Obviously, it was extremely hurtful to the big girl when it came back to her that people were making fun of me for having sex with her. She was also hurt that I hadn't said a word to her since the night we had sex.

So was I raped according to California law? Not the way I interpret it. My judgment was impaired, but it wasn't impaired to the point where I couldn't comprehend what was happening. But if California law, when properly interpreted, would make me the victim of rape in this situation then it is a stupid fucking law. I was the asshole, not the victim.

It never even crossed my mind that I may have been the victim of rape. But that's because I'm not a female who has been indoctrinated by feminazi propaganda. In college, I found myself in an almost identical circumstance. Except this time, it was my feminist girlfriend who got drunk and cheated on me. When I found out about it and confronted her, she played the "rape" card. My initial instinct was to believe her, but as she was explaining what happened I realized she had the same fucked up idea of what it means to be raped as some of the people in this thread. She wasn't raped. She just willfully had sex with a "loser" that she never would have fucked had she been sober, and calling it rape was a way to absolve herself of responsibility. The guy she had sex with had also been drinking. When I asked her if this means she also raped him she said NO, because he would have had sex with her even if he was sober. By the end of the conversation, she realized "rape" wasn't the right word to describe what had happened, but still expected me to accept that she was somehow a victim in the situation. I dumped her and berated her, but didn't slap her.

Is this why you hate women and think you should be allowed to murder one?



The idiotic kind

Well, hello there, haven't seen you in a while!

For every man falsely accused a dozen actual rapists get away with the crime either because the court decided she was "asking for it" or the girl was to afraid to go to the police because......the court would tell everyone they would ask for it.

What I am 100% sure of is the only people I would like to kill are men like you.

Now go back to masturbating to rape porn you piece of shit then suck off your boyfriend LJ.

This can't be emphasized enough. And a dozen is most likely a gross understatement.
 
Originally Posted by lovecraft68 View Post

For every man falsely accused a dozen actual rapists get away with the crime either because the court decided she was "asking for it" or the girl was to afraid to go to the police because......the court would tell everyone they would ask for it.

What I am 100% sure of is the only people I would like to kill are men like you.

Now go back to masturbating to rape porn you piece of shit then suck off your boyfriend LJ.

That makes it ok for the falsely accused to be sent to prison? It "makes up" for the guilty who get away with it. Wow.
 
How about "feel contempt for women"? Does that suit you better?

No, not "contempt." I don't think so. Frustration based on liking them too much that grows into hostility, perhaps. I think that's a psychological phenomena, not that common but it exists. There is also men who have repressed hostility toward their an abusive or neglectful mother who "take it out" on other women when they become adults.

However, when liberals use the word "hate" they mean it in a socio-political sense that a "dominant group" "hates" an "oppressed group" for some sort of political reason. I don't think that applies when a man has hostility toward women. Its not an ideological act. Liberals like to claim everything is about their list of "oppressed groups" that they claim are victimized by society. That's not what we're talking about when some sexual psychopath commits sexual crimes. They have personal reasons for it, its got nothing to do with men vs. women the way liberals claim.
 
No, not "contempt." I don't think so. Frustration based on liking them too much that grows into hostility, perhaps. I think that's a psychological phenomena, not that common but it exists. There is also men who have repressed hostility toward their an abusive or neglectful mother who "take it out" on other women when they become adults.

However, when liberals use the word "hate" they mean it in a socio-political sense that a "dominant group" "hates" an "oppressed group" for some sort of political reason. I don't think that applies when a man has hostility toward women. Its not an ideological act. Liberals like to claim everything is about their list of "oppressed groups" that they claim are victimized by society. That's not what we're talking about when some sexual psychopath commits sexual crimes. They have personal reasons for it, its got nothing to do with men vs. women the way liberals claim.

Yeah, not really. I was talking about this guy on Lit, not a group of people. One guy. The one who thinks it's ok to murder a woman who has wronged him. You're seriously overreaching.

This has nothing to do with politics, liberal or conservative. WTF, dude.
 
Where have I said that it is OK to take advantage of drunk people? No where.

We came upon this subject because Sean said that all drunk sex is rape and so therefore every adult he knows has been the victim and perpetrator of rape. I think this is absurd. I don't think two people who share a bottle of wine together and then have sex are raping each other. Not in the legal sense and not in the moral sense. You seem to disagree with me and think that this is technically rape in the legal sense, but not in the moral sense. But because I disagree with your legal interpretation, you now inexplicably suppose that I must condone behavior that would be clearly exploitative.

In high school I had sex with a big girl that I wouldn't have had sex with had I been sober. She had made advances toward me in the past when we were both sober, and I had said no thanks. The night we had sex, she was basically sober (was a designated driver) and I was extremely drunk (was throwing up the next morning). I didn't tell anyone what happened because I was embarrassed, and because I didn't want the very hot girl I had recently started dating to find out about it. But the big girl didn't keep quiet, and before long everyone knew about it. My girlfriend dumped me, slapped me, and berated me in front of everyone at school for cheating on her with a fat cow. My friends thought it was hilarious, and had a jolly time making fun of me for losing a hot girl because I cheated on her with an ugly one. I was the Hugh Grant of my high school. Obviously, it was extremely hurtful to the big girl when it came back to her that people were making fun of me for having sex with her. She was also hurt that I hadn't said a word to her since the night we had sex.

So was I raped according to California law? Not the way I interpret it. My judgment was impaired, but it wasn't impaired to the point where I couldn't comprehend what was happening. But if California law, when properly interpreted, would make me the victim of rape in this situation then it is a stupid fucking law. I was the asshole, not the victim.

It never even crossed my mind that I may have been the victim of rape. But that's because I'm not a female who has been indoctrinated by feminazi propaganda. In college, I found myself in an almost identical circumstance. Except this time, it was my feminist girlfriend who got drunk and cheated on me. When I found out about it and confronted her, she played the "rape" card. My initial instinct was to believe her, but as she was explaining what happened I realized she had the same fucked up idea of what it means to be raped as some of the people in this thread. She wasn't raped. She just willfully had sex with a "loser" that she never would have fucked had she been sober, and calling it rape was a way to absolve herself of responsibility. The guy she had sex with had also been drinking. When I asked her if this means she also raped him she said NO, because he would have had sex with her even if he was sober. By the end of the conversation, she realized "rape" wasn't the right word to describe what had happened, but still expected me to accept that she was somehow a victim in the situation. I dumped her and berated her, but didn't slap her.

Sorry, I can't comment. I stopped reading at "feminazi".
 
Acquaintance rape is a crime that our justice system is incapable of effective handling. Probably more so than any other serious crime there are guilty people who get away with it and innocent people who are wrongfully convicted. And this is because it usually just comes down to he said, she said. If the only evidence against the guy accused of rape is the testimony of the alleged victim, how could any juror not have a "reasonable doubt"? This situation is obviously unfair toward women, and so I think we implicitly lower the standard of proof for rape. The end result is that I think we still have a lot of rapists who get away with it, I think we now also have a lot of innocent people get convicted.

If I'm raped, and I can't get justice in the court, but I could somehow kill my rapist and get away it, I would. If I'm a guy convicted of rape based on a false and malicious accusation, and once out of prison I have the opportunity to kill the liar who put me there and get away with it, I would.

I don't think death is the most just punishment for rapists or successful false accusers. But it is more just than no punishment at all.

PullnPray, like others have said, I think it is far-fetched that you would ever be in a situation where murdering the woman who has falsely accused you of rape would somehow save you from going to prison. But if that situation could somehow occur, then yes, I think you would be justified in killing the person who was trying to take away your freedom. Because a woman losing her life because she maliciously accused an innocent man of rape is far more just than an innocent man going to prison for 10 years and the liar who put him there cashing in on a $1.5 million lawsuit.

Not until we are all wearing smart contact lenses that can record everything that we see will the problem of rape will be solved. At least mostly solved.

Sorry, I can't comment. I stopped reading at "feminazi".

I think "feminazi" is a useful term for separating feminists who merely believe in gender equality from feminists who hate men and/or promote unscientific dogma.
 
Last edited:
I think "feminazi" is a useful term for separating feminists who merely believe in gender equality from feminists who hate men and/or promote unscientific dogma.

I think equating or associating anyone other than genocidal asswipes with "nazis" is insulting to both feminists and those who suffered from the actions of actual nazis.
 
I've seen a false rape allegation destroy a friend of mine. The girl recanted her allegations... a few days after he committed suicide.

If someone accused me of rape I would definitely want them dead and I'd feel morally justified in destroying them, but the cost to me would be far too great.

That's just me though.
 
The piecings in your ears. I did both your ears and your nostrils and the look on your face snorting cum. Priceless.

Threads like this are why I love lurking on the GB.

The mental image this conjured could only be improved if the person had pierced cheeks too. :D
 
Plenty of black men were hanged for rape when they were caught in bed with a white mans wife. It usta be common in some places. Women lie their asses off all the time. And only fools ignore this reality.
 
So if the tax people overcharged you like fucking crazy, right, and there was a worldwide telecommunications blackout and EVERY cop, FBI, CIA, NSA and secret service operative was at the other end of the country (at a security conference) and you walked past Fort Knox and the fucking doors were wide open... would you FUCKING ROB THAT BITCHIN' PLACE???

*hic*
 
<Snip>

In high school I had sex with a big girl that I wouldn't have had sex with had I been sober. She had made advances toward me in the past when we were both sober, and I had said no thanks. The night we had sex, she was basically sober (was a designated driver) and I was extremely drunk (was throwing up the next morning). I didn't tell anyone what happened because I was embarrassed, and because I didn't want the very hot girl I had recently started dating to find out about it. But the big girl didn't keep quiet, and before long everyone knew about it. My girlfriend dumped me, slapped me, and berated me in front of everyone at school for cheating on her with a fat cow. My friends thought it was hilarious, and had a jolly time making fun of me for losing a hot girl because I cheated on her with an ugly one. I was the Hugh Grant of my high school. Obviously, it was extremely hurtful to the big girl when it came back to her that people were making fun of me for having sex with her. She was also hurt that I hadn't said a word to her since the night we had sex.

So was I raped according to California law? Not the way I interpret it. My judgment was impaired, but it wasn't impaired to the point where I couldn't comprehend what was happening. But if California law, when properly interpreted, would make me the victim of rape in this situation then it is a stupid fucking law. I was the asshole, not the victim.

It never even crossed my mind that I may have been the victim of rape. But that's because I'm not a female who has been indoctrinated by feminazi propaganda. In college, I found myself in an almost identical circumstance. Except this time, it was my feminist girlfriend who got drunk and cheated on me. When I found out about it and confronted her, she played the "rape" card. My initial instinct was to believe her, but as she was explaining what happened I realized she had the same fucked up idea of what it means to be raped as some of the people in this thread. She wasn't raped. She just willfully had sex with a "loser" that she never would have fucked had she been sober, and calling it rape was a way to absolve herself of responsibility. The guy she had sex with had also been drinking. When I asked her if this means she also raped him she said NO, because he would have had sex with her even if he was sober. By the end of the conversation, she realized "rape" wasn't the right word to describe what had happened, but still expected me to accept that she was somehow a victim in the situation. I dumped her and berated her, but didn't slap her.

Mate, if I was you? I'd blame your penis for falling into the sex hole of a fat chick. It's not your fault if when you get inebriated you wear beer goggles and get led around by your cock.

I suggest you get a better handle on that philandering pecker of yours and give it a good old thrashing. ;)

Reading your own written words you seem a little angry towards women.

I am a therapist on the internet so for $199.99 a month I could make time in
my busy schedule to fit you in and you can lie on my couch and I'll feign interest. :)
 
So if the tax people overcharged you like fucking crazy, right, and there was a worldwide telecommunications blackout and EVERY cop, FBI, CIA, NSA and secret service operative was at the other end of the country (at a security conference) and you walked past Fort Knox and the fucking doors were wide open... would you FUCKING ROB THAT BITCHIN' PLACE???

*hic*

No I would not rob that place under those conditions. Nor for moral reasons. I don't have a whole lot of those but I have no idea how to convert gold brick into spendable cash. Unless what I learned from Ben 10 is accurate and Fort Knox actually houses one of the 11 Men In Black bases with alien super weapons that I could use if not to conquer the world certainly to be the baddest son bitch in a hundred miles that stuff is useless to me.
 
If someone sets you up for murder and you wind up on death-row, then yes, what they have done to you is worse than just killing you. You will lose your life and your reputation.

A woman who falsely accuses a man of rape, causing him to lose his freedom, his reputation, and potentially, be repeatedly raped himself, has committed a wrong just as great if not greater than a man who rapes a woman.

If you are concerned about your reputation, this thread was a serious misstep.
 
Mate, if I was you? I'd blame your penis for falling into the sex hole of a fat chick. It's not your fault if when you get inebriated you wear beer goggles and get led around by your cock.

I suggest you get a better handle on that philandering pecker of yours and give it a good old thrashing. ;)

Reading your own written words you seem a little angry towards women.

I am a therapist on the internet so for $199.99 a month I could make time in
my busy schedule to fit you in and you can lie on my couch and I'll feign interest. :)

Handle on that pecker made me snort out loud.
 
Back
Top