PayDay
unlabelable
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Posts
- 6,872
Cloward-Piven
The Grand Scheme:
@Does Not Exist:
#187: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62539175&postcount=187
#842: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62459427&postcount=842
#349: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=49281709&postcount=349
I dunno... Your call:
Since 1950 is how many generations?
This year is 64/63 years later..
+#830: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62331227&postcount=830
+Immigration 'en todos' :
#3: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62344863&postcount=3
Or (same thing):
#831: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62345167&postcount=831
+#733: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=61940851&postcount=733
+The end of It all starts with the Kids: Part2
#759: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62000195&postcount=759
Does Not Exist?
*bonus: Follow the Numbers:
#806: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62215779&postcount=806
#820: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62295519&postcount=820
#839: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62457983&postcount=839
#841: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62459379&postcount=841
...or blame the lawyers:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1112891
The Grand Scheme:
@Does Not Exist:
#187: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62539175&postcount=187
#52: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62490659&postcount=52PayDay said:2.69 / 2.45 / 2.27
3:21
2.64/2.67/2.62
2.55/2.59/2.58
2.59/2.58/2.59
#842: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62459427&postcount=842
+this:PayDay said:Proof that someone wants to crash the system:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/ig-2b-disability-claims-approved-mistake
A small group of Social Security judges have improperly approved disability claims for nearly 25,000 people who didn't qualify, costing taxpayers $2 billion over the past seven years, government investigators conclude in a report being released Monday.
The price tag will grow by nearly $300 million next year because many of these people are still getting benefits, the report said.
Social Security's office of inspector general is scheduled to release a report on the judges Monday. The Associated Press obtained a copy Friday.
If this isn't a war for posterity then it's about destroying the United States of America from the inside out and top down.
#349: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=49281709&postcount=349
PayDay said:SO: I found this article that's actually two in one::
1st so all the rhetoric about entitlements (a takers) seems to be true::
"The fast expansion of disability here is part of a national trend that has seen the number of former workers receiving benefits soar from just over 5 million to 8.8*million between 2000 and 2012. An additional 2.1 million dependent children and spouses also receive benefits.
The crush of new recipients is putting unsustainable financial pressure on the program. Federal officials project that the program will exhaust its trust fund by 2016 — 20 years before the trust fund that supports Social Security’s old-age benefits is projected to run dry.
The growth of the disability rolls has*accelerated since the recession hit in 2007. As the labor market tightened, workers with disabilities that employers previously accommodated on the job — painful hips, mental disorders, weak hearts — were often the first to go.
Finding new work often proved difficult, causing many to turn to the disability rolls for support. The migration of so many people from work to the disability rolls is raising concern among lawmakers in Congress that the program is being stretched beyond its original intent of providing a safety net for former workers whose medical problems make them unable to work.
Last week, the Government Accountability Office (A+) found that the program*made $1.3 billion in potentially improper payments*to people who had jobs when they were supposedly disabled."
--->That's not even the 'best' part of the 1st part...
"The allegedly improper payments represent less than 1 percent of disability payments."
Which means that.... 'Bueller? NE1?'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...91915c-1575-11e3-804b-d3a1a3a18f2c_print.html
So I forgots this::
http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/oasdi_sc/2012/table02.html
Turns out 1.5 million people in NJare on SS, 200000ish or so are workers
What about your state, @lso::
How many people have you seen outside lately?
...and the lemon curry::: Post #326
PayDay said:Think about this... HERE IS YOUR ZJ ::: ----v
#6: The Symptoms of Early Childhood Abuse RESEMBLE THAT of AUTISM and ADHD + SO Many More
Kanner's Syndrome aka Kanner's Autism aka Adjustment Disorder
Quote:Adjustment disorder, agoraphobia, antipsychotics, anxiety, anxiety disorders, autism, behavioral therapy, body dysmorphic disorder, brain disease, brain disorder, CBT, conversion disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, dissociative disorders, GAD, generalized anxiety disorder, identify disorder, Kanner's syndrome, neurological disease, neurological disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD, mental illness, personality disorders, phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychiatric, psychiatrist, psychosocial treatment, psychotherapy, psychotic, psychosis, psychosomatic disorder, PTSD, SAD, schizophrenia, serotonin, social anxiety disorder, somatization disorder, somatoform disorder.
Still wonder why it is being over diagnosed and turning into an epidemic?
Denis Leary may have been totally wrong when he said 'there is no autism, only bad parents,' but he ALSO may have been onto something.
A Perfect Circle :::
teh and >.<
'...Well that explains everything...'
I dunno... Your call:
Since 1950 is how many generations?
This year is 64/63 years later..
+#830: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62331227&postcount=830
PayDay said:So this one caught my eye on a 'what else are they doing but nothing" search:
I personally don't like the tone but thatmay just be me:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paulg...d_b_6107620.html?utm_hp_ref=lame-duck-session
In September, senators left town without voting on any of the 16 district court nominees who had already been fully vetted by the Judiciary Committee and advanced to the Senate floor. Another eight district court nominees had their hearings in September and will be ready for committee approval the week the Senate returns, so the full Senate will be able to hold votes for them, as well. That's at least 24 district court vacancies that could be filled during the lame duck.
Eight of these would fill vacancies in three states -- Texas, Georgia, and Kentucky -- where the need is so great that the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts has formally designated them as "judicial emergencies." All three of these states are represented by Republican senators, including the future Majority Leader.
Good info and could easily be run down.
Then it went poodoo:
There is no reason not to allow the Senate to vote on the judicial nominations before it.In past years, when the Senate was a more functional body, confirmation votes for district court nominees were regularly held by unanimous consent or voice vote, taking a few seconds or minutes at most. That includes during lame duck sessions.The Constitution assigns to the Senate the job of deciding whether to confirm the president's judicial nominees. When the Senate is prevented from acting on this basic task in a timely manner, the entire third branch of the United States government atrophies.*
Well.... if only...
...works both ways:
This Senate had no problems doing this?---v #605
PayDay said:TOGO W/POST #s 601 602 603 &604
This has been bothering me for a while.
...but good news, someone wrote it down and explained it, so I don't have to translate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/u...y-obama-reshapes-appellate-bench.html?src=twr
“With all the gridlock, it is forgotten that one of the most profound changes this Congress made was filling the bench,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who led the push with the White House last summer to force the confirmation of three nominees to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after Republicans blocked them. “This will affect America for a generation, long after the internecine battles on legislative issues are forgotten.”
With so many of the administration’s policies facing legal challenges, the increased likelihood that those cases could end up before more ideologically sympathetic judges is a reassuring development to the White House. Nowhere has this dynamic been more evident than at the District of Columbia court, which is considered the second most important appeals court in the nation, after the Supreme Court.
The full appeals court agreed this month to hear Halbig v. Burwell, a case that could unravel the system of federal insurance exchanges established by the Affordable Care Act. Before Democrats curtailed Republicans’ right to use filibusters, which they accomplished by rewriting Senate rules through a maneuver known as “the nuclear option,” the District of Columbia court was dominated by judges who were appointed by Republican presidents. Today it has four Republican appointees and seven Democratic appointees, four of whom Mr. Obama picked.
With control of the Senate at stake in November’s midterm elections, the success of Democrats in reshaping the courts is a reminder of the subtle power that the majority party has even in a moribund Congress. Republicans, who have watched with growing alarm as the Obama nominees passed through the Senate, have begun raising the issue as they try to win six seats they need to take the majority.
“It’s no surprise that President Obama has been able to transform the ideological makeup of the courts — that happens when you have six years to pick judges and your party controls the Senate,” said Edward Whelan, the president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, who was a senior official in the Justice Department under President George W. Bush. “The best way for conservative voters to prevent further damage to the courts is to swing the Senate to Republican control in the elections this November.”
Yeah I didn't think they had any problem with that....
Americans are justly proud of our judicial system, which we count on to guarantee fairness and justice for all. It is not a controversial or partisan position to state that our courts should be staffed.*
I'm not proud of anything but most of the court clerks I dealt with.
+this: #247: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=45182537&postcount=247
&this: #738: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=61942395&postcount=738
+Immigration 'en todos' :
#3: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62344863&postcount=3
Or (same thing):
#831: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62345167&postcount=831
+#733: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=61940851&postcount=733
+#653: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=61437499&postcount=653 (just for fun)PayDay said:TOGO W/POST #S 726, 727 & 731:
Oh look, an UnConstitutional court ruling that gives persons the right to spread a plague across America:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20141031/us--ebola-nurse_quarantined-maine-6f5110d256.html
Judge Charles C. LaVerdiere ruled Hickox must continue daily monitoring and coordinate travel with state health officials to ensure continuity of monitoring. The judge said there's no need to restrict her movements because she's not infectious because she's showing no symptoms.
...
In a court filing, the director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention backed away from the state's original request for an in-home quarantine and called for restrictions that fall in line with federal guidelines.
Hickox remains at risk of being infected with Ebola until the end of a 21-day incubation period, Dr. Sheila Pinette.
Awful coincidental that the CDC page was changed and that the FeD stance on what does and doesn't spread this disease is all over the place.
Above the Law
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094602/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
@1:41:37 (with commercials)
http://livedash.ark.com/transcript/above_the_law/8262/AMCP/Sunday_May_30_2010/315312/
Nico said:GENTLEMEN, WHENEVER YOU HAVE A GROUP Of individuals who are beyond any investigation, who can manipulate the press, judges, members of our congress, you're always going to have within our government those who are above the law.
+The end of It all starts with the Kids: Part2
#759: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62000195&postcount=759
PayDay said:Due to distraction protocol many may have forgotten that persons are still crossing the border en mass.
They haven't stopped, Executive Orders have made sure of that. So while the tide still flows in, we're losing track of where the already arrived have gone.
I called this way back in the thread, then it happened, now this is getting worse: 70% of family units do not show up to court, the percentage of individuals not showing up is higher.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...y-Units-Failed-to-Appear-in-Immigration-Court
According to the EOIR documents, in that two-and-a-half month period from mid-July to early October, immigration judges across the country rendered 3,885 decisions on removal cases dealing with “aliens” in family units. Of those decisions, 94 percent (3,661) were made “in absentia,” or the alien’s failure to appear resulted in an order of removal.*
The document also showed that 9,874 cases were still pending over those months.*
Also during that same brief snapshot of time, there were 9,274 first hearings scheduled for unaccompanied minors. An EOIR document shows that of the 9,170 cases that appeared before a judge, there were 7,330 adjournments, 436 venue changes, and 1,404 decisions rendered.
Of the 1,404 decisions, 1,229 unaccompanied minors were ordered removed, 1,148 of which were made in absentia, or their order for removal resulted from a failure to show up.
If YOU skip court as an American citizen, YOU get a bench warrant and YOU get arrested, and YOU get your warrant put into the police system so that they can pull YOU over and arrest YOU when they run YOUR tags.
Ask me how iKnow.
Does Not Exist?
*bonus: Follow the Numbers:
#806: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62215779&postcount=806
#820: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62295519&postcount=820
#839: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62457983&postcount=839
#841: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=62459379&postcount=841
...or blame the lawyers:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1112891