What a sanctimonious, partisan hack. The only other place he could get a job is MSNBC.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a sanctimonious, partisan hack. The only other place he could get a job is MSNBC.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I
Bwhahahaha. Accosta got him to argue against the statue of liberty.
Miller is a complete fool and looked like a complete moron during that interview.
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
It was Miller Time at the White House. Acosta was kicked to the curb like a skid row wino.
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
Obviously, Acosta knows nothing of our immigration laws or how they have been applied in the past, before Obama and before Ted Kennedy.
I must admit I didn't watch the whole exchange. Did Acosta claim the Lazarus poem is law and policy, as opposed to a cultural artefact oft cited as a quintessential American ideal?
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
Obviously, Acosta knows nothing of our immigration laws or how they have been applied in the past, before Obama and before Ted Kennedy.
Bwhahahaha. Accosta got him to argue against the statue of liberty.
Miller is a complete fool and looked like a complete moron during that interview.
He knows even less about the history of the Statue of Liberty. That line is from a sonnet by Emma Lazarus and was donated to the friends of the poet in 1903, BEFORE congress slammed the door on immigration in 1916. The plaque was mounted inside the base until the 1986 renovation when it was moved to the Statue of Liberty Museum. It was NEVER part of the original design nor was it part of the original symbolism of the statue.
At the time Lazarus wrote her sonnet the US did have an open door immigration policy. It appears the in Acosta's mind we still do, or should anyway. Further carrying through on Acosta's distorted, or lack of, knowledge of history the original sin was committed back in 1916 by the US congress and president Wilson who signed the act into law.
If anyone wants to argue the merits of the proposed policy......fine. But using the Statue of Liberty, and more precisely Lazarus's sonnet, as the basis of said argument is stupid beyond belief.
Ishmael
Accosta "asked whether the Trump administration's newly unveiled, merit-based proposal for granting green cards is in keeping with U.S. tradition."
He didn't say the poem was the law of the land.
He said that it reflected the spirit of the US as a beacon of hope around the world. That's why the poem was put on the Statue.
But keep arguing things that weren't said. It seems as though that's all you have.
Accosta "asked whether the Trump administration's newly unveiled, merit-based proposal for granting green cards is in keeping with U.S. tradition."
He didn't say the poem was the law of the land.
He said that it reflected the spirit of the US as a beacon of hope around the world. That's why the poem was put on the Statue.
But keep arguing things that weren't said. It seems as though that's all you have.
There is NO FUCKING TRADITION, there is merely the law of the land.
Ishmael
There is NO FUCKING TRADITION, there is merely the law of the land.
Ishmael
The Statue of Liberty is an inanimate object that has NOTHING to do with the law of the land. The little 'feel good' sentence at the base is not green card policy nor is it enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, or The Constitution. The US DOES NOT have an open door immigration policy nor has it had one in over 100 years. Miller was entirely correct in pointing out Acosta's abysmal ignorance.
Ishmael
He knows even less about the history of the Statue of Liberty. That line is from a sonnet by Emma Lazarus and was donated to the friends of the poet in 1903, BEFORE congress slammed the door on immigration in 1916. The plaque was mounted inside the base until the 1986 renovation when it was moved to the Statue of Liberty Museum. It was NEVER part of the original design nor was it part of the original symbolism of the statue.
At the time Lazarus wrote her sonnet the US did have an open door immigration policy. It appears the in Acosta's mind we still do, or should anyway. Further carrying through on Acosta's distorted, or lack of, knowledge of history the original sin was committed back in 1916 by the US congress and president Wilson who signed the act into law.
If anyone wants to argue the merits of the proposed policy......fine. But using the Statue of Liberty, and more precisely Lazarus's sonnet, as the basis of said argument is stupid beyond belief.
Ishmael
Looks like The Zipper knows even less than Acosta, who made a complete ass of himself.
This. ^^^^^
And this, again. ^^^^^^
This. ^^^^^
And this, again. ^^^^^^