Women's Sex Problems Overestimated

La Principessa

sweetheart w/ great AVs
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
2,921
Damn.....when will they ever learn??

Study: Women Sex Problems Overestimated
By RICK CALLAHAN

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - A new study suggests sex researchers have been overestimating the prevalence of sexual problems in women for years - perhaps because they have been looking at things from a man's point of view.

The Kinsey Institute study found that a quarter of American women are significantly distressed about their sex lives - far less than the 43 percent a 1999 study labeled as suffering from sexual dysfunction.

Research on the topic has tended to focus on physical aspects of sex, such as orgasms and arousal. But the new study found that the best predictors of a woman's sexual satisfaction are her general emotional well-being and her emotional relationship with her partner.

``This study emphasizes the importance of non-physiological components of sexuality as well as the general importance of mental health,'' said John Bancroft, director of the Indiana University-based Kinsey Institute. ``It's not conclusive, but it counterbalances what I believe to be the rather extraordinary conclusion that 43 percent of women suffer from sexual dysfunction.''

The Kinsey study, which will appear in the June issue of the Archives of Sexual Behavior, was a random telephone survey of 853 women, ages 20 to 65, who had been in a heterosexual relationship for at least six months.

Among other things, it found that 24.4 percent of those women reported ``marked distress'' about their sexual relationship, their own sexuality or both, within the previous month.

That contrasts with a University of Chicago study that questioned more than 1,700 women, ages 18 to 59. That 1999 study found 43 percent of women reported having one or more persistent symptoms of sexual dysfunction, such as a lack of desire for sex, during the previous year.

University of Chicago sociologist Edward Laumann, who led the 1999 research, said the new work cannot be directly compared to his study. While that study involved face-to-face, 90-minute interviews with women, he said the Kinsey study was an impersonal, random telephone survey.

He also said the Kinsey study excluded women who had not had a regular sexual partner within the preceding six months, potentially eliminating women with serious sexual problems.

Other researchers said science has for decades disregarded the fact that some women's sexual lives are encumbered not by physical problems, but relationship or emotional turmoil unrelated to sexual performance.

Beverly Whipple, president of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, based in Allentown, Pa., said researchers who have studied women in the past based their findings on what is important to men: desire, arousal and orgasm.

``I don't think we should try to lock women into a male model of what's important. Women are not men; there's so much we don't know,'' she said.

Patricia J. Aletky, a clinical psychologist with the Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, noted that decades ago women were labeled ``frigid'' if they had little or no sexual desire. It was a diagnosis that often disregarded factors such as domestic violence or overwork from caring for children, she said.

``There has been a long history of over-pathologizing women, and in that regard I think it's very encouraging that we're starting to look at the bigger picture,'' Aletky said.



01/18/03 06:55

© Copyright The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
 
La Principessa said:
Damn.....when will they ever learn??

Research on the topic has tended to focus on physical aspects of sex, such as orgasms and arousal. But the new study found that the best predictors of a woman's sexual satisfaction are her general emotional well-being and her emotional relationship with her partner.


I think they eventually learn.............but shoot..........it shouldn't be that diffucult..............

greybeard
 
and someone paid money for this......

Desert Amazon said:
:confused:

That's an awful verbose way of saying: "It's 99% mental."

and these are trained professionals...............

greybeard
 
La Principessa said:
The Kinsey study, which will appear in the June issue of the Archives of Sexual Behavior, was a random telephone survey of 853 women, ages 20 to 65, who had been in a heterosexual relationship for at least six months.
While I appreciate the shift in focus in the study, I question the validity of results reached through telemarketing-style tactics. How many people openly answer questions about their sex life to a stranger that phones them?
 
"There has been a long history of over-pathologizing women..."

Best line in the whole article.

The medical and behavioral industries have been been trying to pathologize and profitize women's emotional responses, respectively, for century or more.

When we all know the simple answer:

"Wimmins is kooky. Don't like what your wimmin says? Wait 10 minnits and ask her again."

Lance
 
They need to do a survey to see how many women are unable to make themselves cum. If we can do it on our own and not with a man, then guess who I think is the problem?:D
 
I particularly love it that they only deemed partnered, heterosexual women worthy of studying.
 
Tell me a-fucking-bout-it!

ksmybuttons said:
They need to do a survey to see how many women are unable to make themselves cum. If we can do it on our own and not with a man, then guess who I think is the problem?:D
 
Oh, Mischka, I don't know about that.

I believe they are more inclined to be open and honest over the phone because it is semi-anonymous for them. None of the embarrassment of a face to face interview. And they have the opportunity to expound on their answers more than they would in a yes/no format on a written questionnaire.


I take exception to this comment:

"He also said the Kinsey study excluded women who had not had a regular sexual partner within the preceding six months, potentially eliminating women with serious sexual problems"

What about those who just haven't had the opportunity? If they haven't had a regular sex partner, why does he assume they have problems other than availability?
 
Agent99 said:
Oh, Mischka, I don't know about that.

I believe they are more inclined to be open and honest over the phone because it is semi-anonymous for them. None of the embarrassment of a face to face interview. And they have the opportunity to expound on their answers more than they would in a yes/no format on a written questionnaire.
Anonymity can lead to more open responses, but from whom? Which women are likely to respond in the first place? Phone surveys result in many hang-ups before someone has the time and inclination to sit there and listen to the questions. I just wonder about the sample group's representation of women as a whole (discounting the skewed selection criteria to begin with).
 
Mischka said:
I just wonder about the sample group's representation of women as a whole (discounting the skewed selection criteria to begin with).
Aye, there's the rub.


Or, according to the study, there's no rub and therein lies the problem.
 
ksmybuttons said:
They need to do a survey to see how many women are unable to make themselves cum. If we can do it on our own and not with a man, then guess who I think is the problem?:D

bingo
 
Desert Amazon said:
Damn Lance, you fucking make my eye twitch at times. On the days when you let "you" show in your words, I actually think you're a decent guy.


Well, I wouldn't want people to start thinking I'm a decent guy...but the predominantly patriarchical medical/behavioral sciences establishment has been making tons of money off varying forms of "women's hysteria" for at least a century.

If they came out and said...."Wimmins is crazy bitches. They should take these pills."...my guess is their "industries" would dry up faster than threads by guys like Ishmael & Texan, who have argued (among other things) that in a "meritocracy" it's perfectly fine to not hire women because they're reproduction activities will cost their businesses lost productivity.

Addressing the insanity and hypocrisy behind our institutions and the people who buy their twaddle with irony and sarcasm is a time-honoured mode of critical thinking and debate.

Sorry it makes your eye twitch...I'd prefer seeing a wry smile as the result.

Lance
 
"there's so much we don't know"


Guess that says it all for most of us men.
 
it may take a bit..........

Touch1 said:
"there's so much we don't know"


Guess that says it all for most of us men.


but some of us are trying real hard..........honest...........

greybeard
 
ksmybuttons said:
They need to do a survey to see how many women are unable to make themselves cum. If we can do it on our own and not with a man, then guess who I think is the problem?:D

heeheeheeheeheehee

:D

S.
 
Back
Top