Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

First of all that has been stated several times over 45+ pages here.

Second, I have asked more than 20 times for an answer to the two basic questions posed in the original post and YOU avoid them like the plague by diverting the subject until my questions are buried on the last page. So why don't YOU stay on subject?

Thirdly who said I was responding to you? Did I quote you? Are you the only person in this conversation?

I never said you were responding directly to me. I just noted that you frequently don't answer direct questions.

As I said quite clearly a while back, your OP has been answered a ways back by numerous people. Any response I gave to that would just be repetition of what others have already said.

You're quite an angry person. Is that just in respect of this issue, or a more general state?
 
I never said you were responding directly to me. I just noted that you frequently don't answer direct questions.

As I said quite clearly a while back, your OP has been answered a ways back by numerous people. Any response I gave to that would just be repetition of what others have already said.

You're quite an angry person. Is that just in respect of this issue, or a more general state?

and then there is that unnatural attachment to inanimate objects
 
The more firearms in a jurisdiction, the more homicides. Is that too tricky?

That's great! Now we've come full circle again. So now just answer the original fucking question.

Apparently it is too tricky.
When a person can't see or refuses to accept the link between a higher concentration of portable death machines in an area and the higher homicide rate I have to wonder whether they're damaged or just highly indoctrinated.

Then again, I guess its possible that actually isn't the case just like it's possible NASA has us duped and the earth really is flat.

If you guys won't even base your view on this issue within reality then it would be silly of me to assume that presenting reality to you will change your minds so I guess I've reached the end of my serious contributions here.
 
Last edited:
First of all that has been stated several times over 45+ pages here.

Second, I have asked more than 20 times for an answer to the two basic questions posed in the original post and YOU avoid them like the plague by diverting the subject until my questions are buried on the last page. So why don't YOU stay on subject?

Thirdly who said I was responding to you? Did I quote you? Are you the only person in this conversation?
Maybe you can find someone claiming that more guns causes more crime, but the only one I see claiming it is you.

As for your original post, there are twenty plus questions in it. Most are of the nature of someone wanting to possess something regardless of any consequences to anyone else. Haven't you learned yet that there are some things that should remain illegal, like snuff films, child porn and heroin?
 
yeah, sure

If you want abortions so bad, and you want to screw with the right to own a gun so bad, why don't you propose amending the 2nd amendment to include wording that abortions can be performed with a handgun... voila, then you've then done BOTH! As it currently stands, abortion isn't a right, it's just a 5-4 SCOTUS decision..
 
If you want abortions so bad, and you want to screw with the right to own a gun so bad, why don't you propose amending the 2nd amendment to include wording that abortions can be performed with a handgun... voila, then you've then done BOTH!

Dude you are genuinely losing your mind.
 
If you want abortions so bad, and you want to screw with the right to own a gun so bad, why don't you propose amending the 2nd amendment to include wording that abortions can be performed with a handgun... voila, then you've then done BOTH! As it currently stands, abortion isn't a right, it's just a 5-4 SCOTUS decision..

Who said anything about abortions? I'm sure that it wasn't me. You might have the wrong thread.
 
Commits, pretty close. Many attempted suicides fail, but those attempted with a gun usually succeed.

Devil's advocate...

If someone wants to end their own life, who the hell are you to stop them?

I can't imagine the circumstances under which I would choose that course, but if I did, it's my business, not yours and not societies. Maybe my family. That's it.
 
Who said anything about abortions? I'm sure that it wasn't me. You might have the wrong thread.

I mentioned abortions, since it could become a right by being Constitutional, I'm suggesting you try to get it included in the second amendment. Both, according to you, involve killing children, so best to cover both in one sweeping action. You got a problem with that?
 
I mentioned abortions, since it could become a right by being Constitutional, I'm suggesting you try to get it included in the second amendment. Both, according to you, involve killing children, so best to cover both in one sweeping action. You got a problem with that?

Nice try!
 
Devil's advocate...

If someone wants to end their own life, who the hell are you to stop them?

I can't imagine the circumstances under which I would choose that course, but if I did, it's my business, not yours and not societies. Maybe my family. That's it.

The stats fo r suicide are reasonably consistant through the western world the method simply changes usa gun suicide is 60% uk rope and asphyxiation suicide is 60% and bmgun is about 2 %

There was a vid I posted earlier about this phenomenon, but conflating suicide into the equations makes a more alarming case for gun abolition.
 
The stats fo r suicide are reasonably consistant through the western world the method simply changes usa gun suicide is 60% uk rope and asphyxiation suicide is 60% and bmgun is about 2 %

There was a vid I posted earlier about this phenomenon, but conflating suicide into the equations makes a more alarming case for gun abolition.

Which is exactly why the grabbers do it.
 
You have to become more serious about your causes it seems. Just plastering the ass end of your Prius does nothing, changing the second amendment has LOOOONG been the goal of Progressives, so again, what's your problem?

https://i.imgur.com/GfJk9j0.jpg

Your attempts at put downs are almost as pathetic as your fear and need to compensate.
I didn't say that I had a problem but since you asked, my problem is that people like you vote and elect reprehensible, self serving pigs who serve corporations and deplorables like you.
 
Your attempts at put downs are almost as pathetic as your fear and need to compensate.
I didn't say that I had a problem but since you asked, my problem is that people like you vote and elect reprehensible, self serving pigs who serve corporations and deplorables like you.

I pretty sure most politicians are of that ilk, but some that support the same things that represent our own beliefs is sometimes the only trade off you get, especially in a majority two party system.
 
I pretty sure most politicians are of that ilk, but some that support the same things that represent our own beliefs is sometimes the only trade off you get, especially in a majority two party system.

I'm an Independent with equal contempt for all politicians.
 
"The only difference between men and boys is the price of their toys," and now the number and size of their gunz.

Skimming through this thread I've noticed that most of the gun rights posters quickly get frustrated with a debate and resort to name calling and fabrications. Just like fascism, when your ideas fail, you resort to violence.

Somewhere in this thread I saw someone claim that gun ownership was a human right and that that belief was supported by the US constitution. That was one of the funniest things I read on this thread. Food, water and air are human rights. Gunz are tools.

It's almost as if they feel their manhood is being taken away.


and then there is that unnatural attachment to inanimate objects

So I can only conclude that Lincoln Duncan and the flower carnal are both pro gun activists that are POSING as grabbers
 
I'm an Independent with equal contempt for all politicians.

Spoken like a true individual buht having contempt does not help control the state of your country, its a fucked up part of democracy sometimes you cop it in the eye on one thing but gain in other areas.

Cant please everyone
Bitches bitch etc ad naeseum. Rarely if ever will politica fully align with your out look but if enough does to facilitate your fundamental beliefs then you vote with that in mind.

We're all people but some ideas are judged better than others for a reason.
 
Your attempts at put downs are almost as pathetic as your fear and need to compensate.
Coochy the slimy traitor has called for North Korea, still formally at war with the US, to launch a nuclear attack on the US. Pay him no heed. Feed him radioactive kimchee.
 
Back
Top