Why do so many Americans distrust the mainstream media? By John Engelman

Yes I have. I provided statistics and cites that showed your argument was nonsense. You ignored it, as you always do with anything that doesn't fit your beliefs.
Then provide the statistics again.

On a number of occasions I have posted data indicating that blacks have an average IQ of 85, compared with an average for whites of 100.

View attachment 2191971

I have also posted data indicating that blacks have a murder rate nearly eight times the white rate.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011

Based on available data from 1980 to 2008—  Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Finally, I have provided data that blacks have an illegitimacy rate that is two and a half times the white rate.

Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women​

ROGER CLEGG FEBRUARY 26, 2020
Late last year, the final data for 2018 were published here (the key is Table 9 on page 25), and here’s what we learn: For all racial and ethnic groups combined, 39.6 percent of births in the United States were out-of-wedlock (incidentally, isn’t that appalling?). And there was as always a tremendous range among groups. For blacks, the number is 69.4 percent; for American Indians/Alaska Natives, 68.2 percent (Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders were at 50.4 percent); for Hispanics, 51.8 percent; for whites, 28.2 percent; and for Asian Americans, a paltry 11.7 percent.
https://www.ceousa.org/2020/02/26/percentage-of-births-to-unmarried-women/

Now, if you have more recent data indicating that blacks have closed the race gaps in IQ, crime, and illegitimacy, please post it. Keep in mind that calling me a "racist" does not refute my argument. It demonstrates that refutation is impossible.
 
Dude, mail order brides are hookers. Hate to break it to ya like that.
Many international brides come from developing countries in Asia. The countries the women come from are faced with unemployment, malnutrition and inflation.[25] However, economic factors are not the only driving factor for women in Asia to enter the mail-order industry. In some cases women were recruited based on their physical appearance, with an emphasis placed on youth and virginity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail-order_bride

-----------

Anyway, I did not say I was married to the Vietnamese woman who was pleased that I preferred Oriental women. I was dating her.

It is true that Oriental women are less likely to be sexually active than white women, and less likely to have illegitimate children.
 
Then provide the statistics again.

On a number of occasions I have posted data indicating that blacks have an average IQ of 85, compared with an average for whites of 100.

View attachment 2191971

I have also posted data indicating that blacks have a murder rate nearly eight times the white rate.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011

Based on available data from 1980 to 2008—  Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Finally, I have provided data that blacks have an illegitimacy rate that is two and a half times the white rate.

Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women​

ROGER CLEGG FEBRUARY 26, 2020
Late last year, the final data for 2018 were published here (the key is Table 9 on page 25), and here’s what we learn: For all racial and ethnic groups combined, 39.6 percent of births in the United States were out-of-wedlock (incidentally, isn’t that appalling?). And there was as always a tremendous range among groups. For blacks, the number is 69.4 percent; for American Indians/Alaska Natives, 68.2 percent (Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders were at 50.4 percent); for Hispanics, 51.8 percent; for whites, 28.2 percent; and for Asian Americans, a paltry 11.7 percent.
https://www.ceousa.org/2020/02/26/percentage-of-births-to-unmarried-women/

Now, if you have more recent data indicating that blacks have closed the race gaps in IQ, crime, and illegitimacy, please post it. Keep in mind that calling me a "racist" does not refute my argument. It demonstrates that refutation is impossible.
This Graph is from a study in 1980, of youths between the ages of 16 and 22 for employment purposes. It has no meaning towards the belief you hold. Yet you claim to be intellectual....*chuckles* fucking racist idiot is all you are....fuck off and die
 
Then provide the statistics again.

On a number of occasions I have posted data indicating that blacks have an average IQ of 85, compared with an average for whites of 100.

View attachment 2191971

I have also posted data indicating that blacks have a murder rate nearly eight times the white rate.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011

Based on available data from 1980 to 2008—  Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Finally, I have provided data that blacks have an illegitimacy rate that is two and a half times the white rate.

Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women​

ROGER CLEGG FEBRUARY 26, 2020
Late last year, the final data for 2018 were published here (the key is Table 9 on page 25), and here’s what we learn: For all racial and ethnic groups combined, 39.6 percent of births in the United States were out-of-wedlock (incidentally, isn’t that appalling?). And there was as always a tremendous range among groups. For blacks, the number is 69.4 percent; for American Indians/Alaska Natives, 68.2 percent (Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders were at 50.4 percent); for Hispanics, 51.8 percent; for whites, 28.2 percent; and for Asian Americans, a paltry 11.7 percent.
https://www.ceousa.org/2020/02/26/percentage-of-births-to-unmarried-women/

Now, if you have more recent data indicating that blacks have closed the race gaps in IQ, crime, and illegitimacy, please post it. Keep in mind that calling me a "racist" does not refute my argument. It demonstrates that refutation is impossible.
What you fail to acknowledge is that your arguments are either "my data is right prove me wrong" or "blacks are inferior to whites genetically".

The problem with the first is that you're the one providing data that is mostly outdated and then telling everyone that the data hasn't changed, yet you can't back that statement up (because you're lazy and don't know where the majority of the data resides) and are expecting others to do so for you.

The problem with the second is that genetically, races are 99.9% the same. (As was mentioned in sources I provided). There are more genetic differences within races than external to them. So even if the data weren't changed with updated data, genetic differences aren't the cause.

Also, the argument/conclusion itself is what makes you racist. Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.
....you continually state that openly and subtlety in every post you create. Blaming others for having it pointed out is your own issue.
 
Why has black social pathology gotten worse since 1963?
Good question....but it can't be genetics since that would follow the curve of population. Answer your own question, don't throw back the failings of your beliefs at me, you racist idiot.
 
This Graph is from a study in 1980, of youths between the ages of 16 and 22 for employment purposes. It has no meaning towards the belief you hold. Yet you claim to be intellectual....*chuckles* fucking racist idiot is all you are....fuck off and die
Post data that indicates intellectual equivalence between Negroes and whites. You cannot, because the data does not exist. By every objective, measurable criterion blacks tend to be significantly less intelligent than whites. This has always been known. It helps to influence what anti racists deride as racism.
 
Post data that indicates intellectual equivalence between Negroes and whites. You cannot, because the data does not exist. By every objective, measurable criterion blacks tend to be significantly less intelligent than whites. This has always been known. It helps to influence what anti racists deride as racism.
I don't have to post data you Racist piece of shit, you are the one claiming there is racial difference ( genetics) not me.

You make the claim, you back up the data.

What I have shown, time and again is Systemic Racism is the reason. And you're a major part of Systemic Racism!!!!
 
What you fail to acknowledge is that your arguments are either "my data is right prove me wrong" or "blacks are inferior to whites genetically".

The problem with the first is that you're the one providing data that is mostly outdated and then telling everyone that the data hasn't changed, yet you can't back that statement up (because you're lazy and don't know where the majority of the data resides) and are expecting others to do so for you.

The problem with the second is that genetically, races are 99.9% the same. (As was mentioned in sources I provided). There are more genetic differences within races than external to them. So even if the data weren't changed with updated data, genetic differences aren't the cause.

Also, the argument/conclusion itself is what makes you racist. Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.
....you continually state that openly and subtlety in every post you create. Blaming others for having it pointed out is your own issue.

What is wrong with being a racist if a racist is one who tells the truth about average, intrinsic racial differences in characteristics necessary for civilization?

---------

"The Inequality Taboo," by Charles Murray, Commentary, September 2005

The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance."

Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels. In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong.

Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five ofthe 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their selfidentified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genedc information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

http://www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

---------

Once we acknowledge that race is an important classification of humans it becomes legitimate to inquire into the ways that the races have differed durably in average characteristics important to civilization. It also becomes legitimate to publicize the results of the inquiries.
 
I don't have to post data you Racist piece of shit, you are the one claiming there is racial difference ( genetics) not me.

You make the claim, you back up the data.

What I have shown, time and again is Systemic Racism is the reason. And you're a major part of Systemic Racism!!!!
Systemic racism is the current alibi for black failure when there is no evidence of racial discrimination.
 
What is wrong with being a racist if a racist is one who tells the truth about average, intrinsic racial differences in characteristics necessary for civilization?

---------

"The Inequality Taboo," by Charles Murray, Commentary, September 2005

The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance."

Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels. In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong.

Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five ofthe 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their selfidentified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genedc information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

http://www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

---------

Once we acknowledge that race is an important classification of humans it becomes legitimate to inquire into the ways that the races have differed durably in average characteristics important to civilization. It also becomes legitimate to publicize the results of the inquiries.
Your copy pasta is from 2005. Race isn't a genetic difference. The genome project has proven that.

If you don't have a problem with being a racist, then why do you bitch about being called one? Again, you don't want to have a discussion, you want people to tell you that you are right that blacks are inferior to whites. And that isn't true.
 
What is wrong with being a racist if a racist is one who tells the truth about average, intrinsic racial differences in characteristics necessary for civilization?

---------

"The Inequality Taboo," by Charles Murray, Commentary, September 2005

The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance."

Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels. In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong.

Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five ofthe 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their selfidentified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genedc information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

http://www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

---------

Once we acknowledge that race is an important classification of humans it becomes legitimate to inquire into the ways that the races have differed durably in average characteristics important to civilization. It also becomes legitimate to publicize the results of the inquiries.
Yet,nothing here is proof of the claim you make.....Try again you fucking Racist...or just fuck off and die. The sooner people such as yourself, and Murray etc all join Rushton, the better place this world will be....*chuckles*
 
Good question....but it can't be genetics since that would follow the curve of population. Answer your own question, don't throw back the failings of your beliefs at me, you racist idiot.
At the beginning of the civil rights movement partisans of the movement confidently predicted that when blacks were no longer discriminated against most of them would begin to emulate the lower rates of crime and illegitimacy of whites. What happened instead was that whites began to emulate black higher rates of crime and illegitimacy, and black rates got even higher.

Behavior is more susceptible to social changes than intelligence. Nevertheless, when social changes are harmful, as increases in crime and illegitimacy certainly are, black behavior is still worse than white behavior.
 
Systemic racism is the current alibi for black failure when there is no evidence of racial discrimination.
Nope, but you keep believing that....Just look at the crime statistics that fall apart if you do admit to Systemic Racism. A black dude gets arrested for spitting on the sidewalk, while the same cop spits and laughs with a white dude.....
 
At the beginning of the civil rights movement partisans of the movement confidently predicted that when blacks were no longer discriminated against most of them would begin to emulate the lower rates of crime and illegitimacy of whites. What happened instead was that whites began to emulate black higher rates of crime and illegitimacy, and black rates got even higher.

Behavior is more susceptible to social changes than intelligence. Nevertheless, when social changes are harmful, as increases in crime and illegitimacy certainly are, black behavior is still worse than white behavior.
Keep trying you fucking racist piece of shit. Again if it was genetics, population would be the only reason, not political policy. Since we can easily see there is no correlation , your argument fails....no need for studies....*chuckles*
 
Your copy pasta is from 2005. Race isn't a genetic difference. The genome project has proven that.

If you don't have a problem with being a racist, then why do you bitch about being called one? Again, you don't want to have a discussion, you want people to tell you that you are right that blacks are inferior to whites. And that isn't true.
The experiment described by Charles Murray clearly demonstrates that anyone connected with the genome project who argues that "race is only a social construct" is mistaken and probably lying. Scientific truth is not established by proclamation, but by repeatable experiments.

Scientists who inquire into genetic differences between the races know that they are safest if their researches are somewhat clandestine. Fortunately, Charles Murray became rich from royalties from The Bell Curve, so he can safely tell the truth.
 
The experiment described by Charles Murray clearly demonstrates that anyone connected with the genome project who argues that "race is only a social construct" is mistaken and probably lying. Scientific truth is not established by proclamation, but by repeatable experiments.
Unfortunately, the genome project only identified the DNA. Multiple studies have taken that data (I provided one) and proven that there are no aillels that differentiate people by race.

Murray isn't a geneticist.....nor has he performed any analysis of DNA that proves differently.
 
Keep trying you fucking racist piece of shit. Again if it was genetics, population would be the only reason, not political policy. Since we can easily see there is no correlation , your argument fails....no need for studies....*chuckles*
Your obscene insults and name calling reveal bad things about your character, while doing nothing to refute my calmly expressed and fact based arguments.
 
Unfortunately, the genome project only identified the DNA. Multiple studies have taken that data (I provided one) and proven that there are no aillels that differentiate people by race.

Murray isn't a geneticist.....nor has he performed any analysis of DNA that proves differently.
DNA evidence cannot only determine race, it can indicate national origins.

Vanessa L Williams' Ancestry DNA Test Results: Two Ethnicities & Nine Nationalities Found​


VANESSA L WILLIAMS’ ANCESTRY DNA TEST SHOCK
Vanessa Williams’ ancestry DNA test was done using a mail order swab kit supplied by genealogy website ancestry.com. Dozens of commercial DNA ancestry websites now offer such tests to the public for around $150.​

A few weeks later Williams results shocked her: “My DNA breaks down as follows,” she began. “I’m 23% from Ghana, 17% from the British Isles, 15% from Cameroon, 12% Finnish, 11% Southern European, 7% Togo, 6% Benin, 5% Senegal and 4% Portuguese.”​

The first thing Williams did was to call her family with the dramatic news. Her diverse results also made her keen to reconnect with the countries of her ancestors: “Now, I can’t wait to go to Ghana and Cameroon and Togo and Senegal — it’s a great opportunity to see why the customs resonate with you,” she said. “The biggest surprise was Finland. How did that happen? Who is Finnish? That is definitely going to be one of my trips coming up.”​


https://www.arogundade.com/celebrity-genetic-testing-vanessa-williams-dna-ancestry.html

View attachment 2191979
 
DNA evidence cannot only determine race, it can indicate national origins.

Vanessa L Williams' Ancestry DNA Test Results: Two Ethnicities & Nine Nationalities Found​


VANESSA L WILLIAMS’ ANCESTRY DNA TEST SHOCK​

Vanessa Williams’ ancestry DNA test was done using a mail order swab kit supplied by genealogy website ancestry.com. Dozens of commercial DNA ancestry websites now offer such tests to the public for around $150.​

A few weeks later Williams results shocked her: “My DNA breaks down as follows,” she began. “I’m 23% from Ghana, 17% from the British Isles, 15% from Cameroon, 12% Finnish, 11% Southern European, 7% Togo, 6% Benin, 5% Senegal and 4% Portuguese.”​

The first thing Williams did was to call her family with the dramatic news. Her diverse results also made her keen to reconnect with the countries of her ancestors: “Now, I can’t wait to go to Ghana and Cameroon and Togo and Senegal — it’s a great opportunity to see why the customs resonate with you,” she said. “The biggest surprise was Finland. How did that happen? Who is Finnish? That is definitely going to be one of my trips coming up.”​


https://www.arogundade.com/celebrity-genetic-testing-vanessa-williams-dna-ancestry.html

View attachment 2191979
Now correlate those differences with brain shape, chemical balances...etc. The argument you're making isn't the same as the genetic analysis mentioned here.
 
Your obscene insults and name calling reveal bad things about your character, while doing nothing to refute my calmly expressed and fact based arguments.
Now, explain why the issues in the USA with African Americans, doesn't reflect the Black population in Canada....*chuckles* you tried and failed before, but hey.....roll the Race dice again, maybe you will get lucky....Racist piece of shit, fuck off and die.
 
DNA evidence cannot only determine race, it can indicate national origins.

Vanessa L Williams' Ancestry DNA Test Results: Two Ethnicities & Nine Nationalities Found​


VANESSA L WILLIAMS’ ANCESTRY DNA TEST SHOCK​

Vanessa Williams’ ancestry DNA test was done using a mail order swab kit supplied by genealogy website ancestry.com. Dozens of commercial DNA ancestry websites now offer such tests to the public for around $150.​

A few weeks later Williams results shocked her: “My DNA breaks down as follows,” she began. “I’m 23% from Ghana, 17% from the British Isles, 15% from Cameroon, 12% Finnish, 11% Southern European, 7% Togo, 6% Benin, 5% Senegal and 4% Portuguese.”​

The first thing Williams did was to call her family with the dramatic news. Her diverse results also made her keen to reconnect with the countries of her ancestors: “Now, I can’t wait to go to Ghana and Cameroon and Togo and Senegal — it’s a great opportunity to see why the customs resonate with you,” she said. “The biggest surprise was Finland. How did that happen? Who is Finnish? That is definitely going to be one of my trips coming up.”​


https://www.arogundade.com/celebrity-genetic-testing-vanessa-williams-dna-ancestry.html

View attachment 2191979
So based on all of your “research”, she would take her 56/44 split and count her as…?

Guessing it’s not as simple as that right?
 
Now correlate those differences with brain shape, chemical balances...etc. The argument you're making isn't the same as the genetic analysis mentioned here.

RACE, EVOLUTION ND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective​

2nd Special Abridged Edition​

by Professor J. Philippe Rushton
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Modern science shows a three-way pattern of race differences in both physical traits and behavior. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole. Whites fall in the middle, but closer to Orientals than to Blacks.

Chart 1: Average Differences
Among Blacks, Whites and Orientals
Trait Blacks Whites Orientals Brain Size: Cranial capacity1,267 1,347 1,364 Cortical neurons (millions)13,185 13,665 13,767 Intelligence: IQ average test scores blacks 85 (purebreds in Africa, 70)whites 100 (Ashkenazi Jews, 115)Orientals 106

View attachment 2191993

Race differences start in the womb. Blacks are born earlier and grow quicker than Whites and Orientals. The three-way race pattern occurs in milestones such as sexual maturity, family stability, crime rates, and population growth...

In the U.S., Blacks are less than 13% of the population but have 50% of all arrests for assault and murder and 67% of all arrests for robbery. Fifty percent of all crime victims also report their assailants are Black, so the arrest statistics cannot be due to police bias.

Blacks make up a large share of those arrested for white-collar crimes. About 33% of persons arrested for fraud, forgery, counterfeiting, and receiving stolen property, and about 25% of those arrested for embezzlement are Black. Blacks are under-represented only in offenses, such as tax fraud and securities violations, that are committed by individuals in high status occupations.

On the other hand, Orientals are under-represented in U.S. crime statistics.

View attachment 2191994


The races differ in their level of sex hormones. Hormone levels are highest in Blacks and the lowest in Orientals. This may tell us why Black women have premenstrual syndrome (PMS) the most and Orientals the least.

The races also differ in testosterone level which helps to explain men's behavior . In one study of college students, testosterone levels were 10 to 20% higher in Blacks than in Whites. For an older sample of U.S. military veterans, Blacks had levels 3% higher than Whites (see the 1992 issue of Steroids). In a study of university students, Black Americans had 10 to 15% higher levels than White Americans. The Japanese (in Japan) had even lower levels.

Testosterone acts as a "master switch." It affects things like self-concept, aggression, altruism, crime, and sexuality, not just in men, but in women too. Testosterone also controls things like muscle mass and the deepening of the voice in the teenage years...

The three-way pattern of race differences is found in rates of multiple births (two-egg twinning), hormone levels, sexual attitudes, sexual anatomy, frequency of intercourse, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Both male and female sex hormone levels are the highest in Blacks, the lowest in Orientals, with Whites in between. Sex hormones affect not only our bodies, but also the way we act and think. Blacks are the most sexually active, have the most multiple births, and have the most permissive attitudes. Orientals are the least sexually active and show the least sexual fantasy and the most sexual guilt. Whites are in the middle. Sex diseases are most common in Blacks, least so in Orientals, with Whites in between the two. The very high rate of AIDS in Africa, the Black Caribbean and in Black Americans is alarming...

IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs. Blacks average the lowest, and Whites fall in between. The brain size differences explain the IQ differences both within groups and between groups.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
 
So based on all of your “research”, she would take her 56/44 split and count her as…?

Guessing it’s not as simple as that right?
Vanessa Williams is a mixed race person. This is obvious both from her appearance, and the results of her DNA test.
 

RACE, EVOLUTION ND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective​

2nd Special Abridged Edition​

by Professor J. Philippe Rushton
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Modern science shows a three-way pattern of race differences in both physical traits and behavior. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole. Whites fall in the middle, but closer to Orientals than to Blacks.

Chart 1: Average Differences
Among Blacks, Whites and Orientals
Trait Blacks Whites Orientals Brain Size: Cranial capacity1,267 1,347 1,364 Cortical neurons (millions)13,185 13,665 13,767 Intelligence: IQ average test scores blacks 85 (purebreds in Africa, 70)whites 100 (Ashkenazi Jews, 115)Orientals 106

View attachment 2191993

Race differences start in the womb. Blacks are born earlier and grow quicker than Whites and Orientals. The three-way race pattern occurs in milestones such as sexual maturity, family stability, crime rates, and population growth...

In the U.S., Blacks are less than 13% of the population but have 50% of all arrests for assault and murder and 67% of all arrests for robbery. Fifty percent of all crime victims also report their assailants are Black, so the arrest statistics cannot be due to police bias.

Blacks make up a large share of those arrested for white-collar crimes. About 33% of persons arrested for fraud, forgery, counterfeiting, and receiving stolen property, and about 25% of those arrested for embezzlement are Black. Blacks are under-represented only in offenses, such as tax fraud and securities violations, that are committed by individuals in high status occupations.

On the other hand, Orientals are under-represented in U.S. crime statistics.

View attachment 2191994


The races differ in their level of sex hormones. Hormone levels are highest in Blacks and the lowest in Orientals. This may tell us why Black women have premenstrual syndrome (PMS) the most and Orientals the least.

The races also differ in testosterone level which helps to explain men's behavior . In one study of college students, testosterone levels were 10 to 20% higher in Blacks than in Whites. For an older sample of U.S. military veterans, Blacks had levels 3% higher than Whites (see the 1992 issue of Steroids). In a study of university students, Black Americans had 10 to 15% higher levels than White Americans. The Japanese (in Japan) had even lower levels.

Testosterone acts as a "master switch." It affects things like self-concept, aggression, altruism, crime, and sexuality, not just in men, but in women too. Testosterone also controls things like muscle mass and the deepening of the voice in the teenage years...

The three-way pattern of race differences is found in rates of multiple births (two-egg twinning), hormone levels, sexual attitudes, sexual anatomy, frequency of intercourse, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Both male and female sex hormone levels are the highest in Blacks, the lowest in Orientals, with Whites in between. Sex hormones affect not only our bodies, but also the way we act and think. Blacks are the most sexually active, have the most multiple births, and have the most permissive attitudes. Orientals are the least sexually active and show the least sexual fantasy and the most sexual guilt. Whites are in the middle. Sex diseases are most common in Blacks, least so in Orientals, with Whites in between the two. The very high rate of AIDS in Africa, the Black Caribbean and in Black Americans is alarming...

IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs. Blacks average the lowest, and Whites fall in between. The brain size differences explain the IQ differences both within groups and between groups.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm
A psychologist arguing human biology is fun.
 
Back
Top