When you discuss the issue of racial slurs before an all-white crowd

LovingTongue said:
There you go with that 'common' again. You quit because you saw that your snake was eating its own tail.

I'd open a discussion on your "common standards" but why bother? You'd only dodge and evade any questions I put forth, just like you did when I challenged your "common standards". Funny how that happened exactly when I stopped doing what you called "running away" from your "iron clad" argument...

Yes, LT. That's it. I realized how utterly impossible it would be to prove that most people would agree that "Don't insult many people when only one has offended you" is a good rule of thumb, or that racial slurs do actually insult many people. I'm sure that any reasonable person can see how preposterous those assumptions are.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Yes, LT. That's it. I realized how utterly impossible it would be to prove that most people would agree that "Don't insult many people when only one has offended you" is a good rule of thumb, or that racial slurs do actually insult many people. I'm sure that any reasonable person can see how preposterous those assumptions are.
If you were right then I would have already alienated this whole neighborhood around me for calling a hispanic kid a jumping bean after he called me a monkey.

Would have left me and the wife and toddler some free time today instead of entertaining a buncha Xboxing maniacs.
 
LovingTongue said:
If you were right then I would have already alienated this whole neighborhood around me for calling a hispanic kid a jumping bean after he called me a monkey.

Would have left me and the wife and toddler some free time today instead of entertaining a buncha Xboxing maniacs.
How many non-racists actually heard you?
 
LovingTongue said:
No, you have not.

You're nothing more than a drooling idiot ward of the state, and your post - most of which is not even worth quoting - explains why.

Oh Boo hoo hoo...the blind, deaf and completely stupid beyond all human belief racist doesn't believe me.

Just so you know LT, I don't hate you because you are Black, in fact I don't hate you at all...I pity you. That's right I feel sorry for your racist dumb ass. Sorry for the fact that your hatred is so blind and so stupid and so out of touch that you simply see no other way to be than a hater. WOW!! That has got to be some wonderful life you lead.

Enjoy your hatred, at least as it burns you up it will at least keep you warm late at night...
 
LovingTongue said:
If you were right then I would have already alienated this whole neighborhood around me for calling a hispanic kid a jumping bean after he called me a monkey.

Would have left me and the wife and toddler some free time today instead of entertaining a buncha Xboxing maniacs.

Quite possibly I do live in my own dream world, inhabited only by me and a few like-minded equines not yet outed from the stable by Ishmael. However, I find that in my own world, people tend to react differently to things said in a moment of anger and things cooly defended at length with a calm mind.

The former, of course, is a thing that happens to all humans and even some horses: we have standards we would like to meet, but we fall short of them. That is the nature of the human (and equine) condition. We err, and we try to do better. When we're past the moment of anger, we can look back and recognize that other ways of dealing with the issue would have been better, but we also recognize that anger can cloud a person's judgement, and so we forgive each other.

The latter is a different thing. It's not a matter of acknowledging that one hasn't been quite what one hopes to be; it's a matter of indicating that one never hopes to establish a higher moral standard for oneself than, say, "I do anything I've seen other people get away with."

I recognize now that you are in the latter category of people. I don't intend to try to shift you from it; I accept that that is the standard you've set for yourself. In the world I inhabit, people think less of people who behave that way, but perhaps we're simply from backgrounds too different to comprehend each other.
 
Last edited:
Fyreguy2006 said:
Oh Boo hoo hoo...the blind, deaf and completely stupid beyond all human belief racist doesn't believe me.

Just so you know LT, I don't hate you because you are Black, in fact I don't hate you at all...I pity you. That's right I feel sorry for your racist dumb ass. Sorry for the fact that your hatred is so blind and so stupid and so out of touch that you simply see no other way to be than a hater. WOW!! That has got to be some wonderful life you lead.

Enjoy your hatred, at least as it burns you up it will at least keep you warm late at night...
No, no, no. You're supposed to give him some original insults; that's what he's fishing for. His insults are all antebellum and stale.
 
Fyreguy2006 said:
Oh Boo hoo hoo...the blind, deaf and completely stupid beyond all human belief racist doesn't believe me.

Just so you know LT, I don't hate you because you are Black, in fact I don't hate you at all...I pity you. That's right I feel sorry for your racist dumb ass. Sorry for the fact that your hatred is so blind and so stupid and so out of touch that you simply see no other way to be than a hater. WOW!! That has got to be some wonderful life you lead.

Enjoy your hatred, at least as it burns you up it will at least keep you warm late at night...[/QUOTE]
Parents of the world, if you don't believe smoking crack while pregnant is bad, please read his post and be convinced.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Quite possibly I do live in my own dream world, inhabited only by me and a few like-minded equines not yet outed from the stable by Ishmael. However, I find that in my own world, people tend to react differently to things said in a moment of anger and things cooly defended at length with a calm mind.

The former, of course, is a thing that happens to all humans and even some horses: we have standards we would like to meet, but we fall short of them. That is the nature of the human (and equine) condition. We err, and we try to do better. When we're past the moment of anger, we can look back and recognize that other ways of dealing with the issue would have been better, but we also recognize that anger can cloud a person's judgement, and so we forgive each other.

The latter is a different thing. It's not a matter of acknowledging that one hasn't been quite what one hopes to be; it's a matter of indicating that one never hopes to establish a higher moral standard for oneself than, say, "I do anything I've seen other people get away with."

I recognize now that you are in the latter category of people. I don't intend to try to shift you from it; I accept that that is the standard you've set for yourself. In the world I inhabit, people think less of people who behave that way, but perhaps we're simply from backgrounds too different to comprehend each other.
Oh well.

There is an "anything goes" rule here with regards to me. I adopt the same principle in kind.

You have failed to show me what profit I gain from treating someone nicer than they treat me.
 
LovingTongue said:
Oh well.

There is an "anything goes" rule here with regards to me. I adopt the same principle in kind.

You have failed to show me what profit I gain from treating someone nicer than they treat me.

Yes. I have.

This is why I say we differ, LT. My definition of "moral standard" does not read "list of things that profit me."
 
Okay, that's it! I've read enough...

LovingTongue said:
Can any of you cowards show me one white person who criticized this:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24028690&postcount=96
https://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=23475259&postcount=131
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=15033212&postcount=85
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24253080&postcount=107

Well? Can you?

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=220429
"Whatthefuck happened to LT? He's destroying my theory of monolithic black coolness."

Who here is stupid enough to say that's not called stereotyping?

Well?

Who wants to be an idiot and deny that's racism?

You want a white person to criticize this? Okay, here I am!

Yes, they're racist remarks! Yes, it's stereotyping! Are you happy now?
I've already said this before: IT'S LAME, IT'S TIRED, AND IT'S POINTLESS!

I think all of you involved with this (the racial attacks) are pathetic and sad. Enough with the racism shit, already! It's old! You need to get over yourselves and grow up!

And LT, some of these folks are right; you need to stop seeing racism around every corner you look. Not everyone in this world is prejudice against people of different colors, ANY colors. Or anything else, for that matter. And it's not right for you to lump everyone into the same category. I've never made any racial remarks to anyone here, you included. Hell, I barely know you (only from what I've read/seen on your posts). But I've seen enough to know there's a lot of pent up anger in you, and some of it is being thrown in the wrong direction. And some of your personal attacks are juvenile and just plain stupid. If that's how you look at people of different colors other than your own, I feel very sorry for you, and if all you're going to do is spread hatred, then racism will never die.
And if that is your intent... you have my pity.
 
Oh, and by the way. If you have to ask what kind of profit you gain from being nice to someone, whether they're nice to you or not... then you deserve none.
 
CaptainKirk said:
Okay, that's it! I've read enough...



You want a white person to criticize this? Okay, here I am!

Yes, they're racist remarks! Yes, it's stereotyping! Are you happy now?
I've already said this before: IT'S LAME, IT'S TIRED, AND IT'S POINTLESS!

I think all of you involved with this (the racial attacks) are pathetic and sad. Enough with the racism shit, already! It's old! You need to get over yourselves and grow up!

And LT, some of these folks are right; you need to stop seeing racism around every corner you look. Not everyone in this world is prejudice against people of different colors, ANY colors. Or anything else, for that matter. And it's not right for you to lump everyone into the same category. I've never made any racial remarks to anyone here, you included. Hell, I barely know you (only from what I've read/seen on your posts). But I've seen enough to know there's a lot of pent up anger in you, and some of it is being thrown in the wrong direction. And some of your personal attacks are juvenile and just plain stupid. If that's how you look at people of different colors other than your own, I feel very sorry for you, and if all you're going to do is spread hatred, then racism will never die.
And if that is your intent... you have my pity.
Any white person who accuses a black person of having pent up anger at being called a nigger...


is an idiot.

Really.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
LT, you and i agree on much.

you're letting your baitors, though, make it appear as if think in terms of black and white.

i've seen your posts on affirmative action; i know otherwise.

you're smart enough to see where you've allowed yourself to be positioned.

and you're smart enough, i think, to avoid it.

He's plenty smart. That doesn't mean that he isn't also plenty hateful.

Again, I find it interesting that intelligence is equated with reason.

Intelligent people do extraordinarily stupid things and then rely on their large IQs and egos to protect them from the idea that they could be doing anything the slightest bit misguided.

I don't think that his primary goal is reason. I think it's being right at all costs. He uses intelligence as a weapon to attain a goal, he doesn't use it to understand.

If you can point me to any post anywhere, where he's changed his mind to agree with a point of view he didn't already agree with...

Or if you can point me to anything he has to say positive about anything he doesn't agree with...

Do let me know.

There's a big difference between being smart and being capable of functioning socially. Different types of intelligence entirely.

Some part of me really hopes he is just laughing his ass off and stirring shit on the internet. Another part of me cautions that if that's true, that deserves its own category of respect for motive, acting ability and perseveration.
 
Last edited:
LovingTongue said:
Oh well.

There is an "anything goes" rule here with regards to me. I adopt the same principle in kind.

You have failed to show me what profit I gain from treating someone nicer than they treat me.

And that is entirely the difference between people who "do unto others as they would have done unto them."

And "do unto others...first"

Your methods are what come under criticism because I'm one of those people who believes that treating people more nicely than they treat me is actually the way to go. It works. I am, in fact, treating you more nicely than you treat me. You've given me any number of insults or threats to life or liberty. I'm pointing out the flaws or the discrepancies in your argument in a way that hopefully could get you to look up at what's actually happening and see it for what it is and not what you'd like it to be.

I'm speaking to you on your terms, on your battlefield, not putting you on ignore, continuing to engage. You appear to be struggling with an issue, I'm actually trying to help.

You get angry about any of those things, whether or not I'm replying to you in a more positive tone, don't seem to be falling down, don't seem to be angry, and that I'm amused. I'm amused not because you're unique, but because you're completely incapable of learning something repeated over and over and over. So 256,708th time's the charm? Maybe.

I'm able to absorb quite a bit of pain and insult because I believe that simply knee-jerk returning that hatred, taking offense and forwarding that hatred does very little except escalate insult to injury. You're a proponent of escalating insult to injury. This is why I disagree with you.

I don't think being an angel or a perfect person would work with you. I can't be perfect and be an example. I have to be exactly about an inch higher than you in tone and reasoning, for you to listen. The rest is out of your reach. Maybe if I put it in your terms, just a little better lit, you'll see.

You don't treat me well. I don't treat you well, because I don't think you appreciate or understand that either. I treat you just a little bit better than you treat me. Like a trail of bread crumbs, to see if you can follow it. So far...no.
 
Last edited:
Recidiva said:
And that is entirely the difference between people who "do unto others as they would have done unto them."

And "do unto others...first"

Your methods are what come under criticism because I'm one of those people who believes that treating people more nicely than they treat me is actually the way to go. It works. I am, in fact, treating you more nicely than you treat me. You've given me any number of insults or threats to life or liberty. I'm pointing out the flaws or the discrepancies in your argument in a way that hopefully could get you to look up at what's actually happening and see it for what it is and not what you'd like it to be.

I'm speaking to you on your terms, on your battlefield, not putting you on ignore, continuing to engage. You appear to be struggling with an issue, I'm actually trying to help.

You get angry about any of those things, whether or not I'm replying to you in a more positive tone, don't seem to be falling down, don't seem to be angry, and that I'm amused. I'm amused not because you're unique, but because you're completely incapable of learning something repeated over and over and over. So 256,708th time's the charm? Maybe.

I'm able to absorb quite a bit of pain and insult because I believe that simply knee-jerk returning that hatred, taking offense and forwarding that hatred does very little except escalate insult to injury. You're a proponent of escalating insult to injury. This is why I disagree with you.

I don't think being an angel or a perfect person would work with you. I can't be perfect and be an example. I have to be exactly about an inch higher than you in tone and reasoning, for you to listen. The rest is out of your reach. Maybe if I put it in your terms, just a little better lit, you'll see.

You don't treat me well. I don't treat you well, because I don't think you appreciate or understand that either. I treat you just a little bit better than you treat me. Like a trail of bread crumbs, to see if you can follow it. So far...no.
The problem here is that you're miles beneath me. You're a snake. A sneaky, slithering, dishonest and cowardly schizophrenic snake.

If you had ever told a black person "my brother in law would call you a nigger" to their face you would get taught a serious lesson in how flawed your "thinking" is.
 
LovingTongue said:
The problem here is that you're miles beneath me. You're a snake. A sneaky, slithering, dishonest and cowardly schizophrenic snake.

If you had ever told a black person "my brother in law would call you a nigger" to their face you would get taught a serious lesson in how flawed your "thinking" is.

Then why are you here? You keep repeating you're so far above the denizens of this joint.

Why not abandon this den of iniquity and go live among the beautiful people?

Could it be that this is a place where you can be your most hateful self and nobody can stop you out of the principle of free speech?

No, we can't stop you, but we can laugh.

Why not just go live amid those of the AH who adore you so completely? Many there have made the choice to avoid the rabble.
 
LovingTongue said:
The problem here is that you're miles beneath me. You're a snake. A sneaky, slithering, dishonest and cowardly schizophrenic snake.

If you had ever told a black person "my brother in law would call you a nigger" to their face you would get taught a serious lesson in how flawed your "thinking" is.

Serious lesson? Do you mean physical violence/assault?
 
Recidiva said:
Then why are you here? You keep repeating you're so far above the denizens of this joint.

Why not abandon this den of iniquity and go live among the beautiful people?

Could it be that this is a place where you can be your most hateful self and nobody can stop you out of the principle of free speech?
Can they stop someone over there either? Hardly. There's no listed mod. And Amicus is always throwing around racial insults and threats. But there's no atmosphere of permissiveness.

No, we can't stop you, but we can laugh.

Why not just go live amid those of the AH who adore you so completely? Many there have made the choice to avoid the rabble.
Why not hang out in both?

After all, you do.

And you call me a nigger via your sockpuppet "brother in law" here whereas you would never even think of pulling that in other forums. Probably because that behavior is almost universally despised outside the GB.
(Do note, folks, how Recidiva ducks and dodges this fact, lol!)
 
Pookie said:
Serious lesson? Do you mean physical violence/assault?
Ayup. And I'm not the only black person on Lit who has told recidiva this.

Before you spew your usual idiocy, stop for a moment, go out and try calling a black woman a racial slur some time in the middle of an argument. If you haven't done it, you really have no counter argument. But I'm sure that in the tradition of Eric Cartman you'll try anyway.
 
LovingTongue said:
Can they stop someone over there either? Hardly. There's no listed mod. And Amicus is always throwing around racial insults and threats. But there's no atmosphere of permissiveness.


Why not hang out in both?

After all, you do.

And you call me a nigger via your sockpuppet "brother in law" here whereas you would never even think of pulling that in other forums. Probably because that behavior is almost universally despised outside the GB.
(Do note, folks, how Recidiva ducks and dodges this fact, lol!)

You stopped talking on the subject when you were over there. Then you came back here to call me thin-skinned angry white trash.

I didn't have to stop talking. I just kept saying the sort of stuff I say here. I don't have two different personalities for two different boards.

Curious, huh?

I can be the same person in both places. You can't.
 
Recidiva said:
You stopped talking on the subject when you were over there. Then you came back here to call me thin-skinned angry white trash.

I didn't have to stop talking. I just kept saying the sort of stuff I say here. I don't have two different personalities for two different boards.

Curious, huh?

I can be the same person in both places. You can't.
Wrong. You accused Amicus of being a racist a while back and I told you on the spot that you're in no position to judge him. I more recently posted your nigger remark on there in a poll where almost everyone saw your remark as being a cowardly way to be a racist.

The facts and your arguments are at odds here. As usual.

I don't say on the AH what I say here because there's no reason to. I don't get threatened on the AH, so why would I call anyone a piece of white trash? Amicus threatened me once and I told him in no uncertain terms he'd get his ass broke off if he tried it, or worse. He hasn't threatened me since, and he's despised (though in a very thinly veiled way) over there.

Over here, Amicus would be a fucking war hero.

Oh hell, this is going way over your head. I'm using too many big words with you. This is where you always completely change the discussion and wander off into some other subject and declare spank. You're known for not being able to take someone on directly. Just like when I proved you were a liar when you said I bring race into EVERY discussion, and you went utterly haywire. Along with the rest of the GB.
 
LovingTongue said:
The problem here is that you're miles beneath me. You're a snake. A sneaky, slithering, dishonest and cowardly schizophrenic snake.

If you had ever told a black person "my brother in law would call you a nigger" to their face you would get taught a serious lesson in how flawed your "thinking" is.

One of the several times ive been jumped in my neighborhood (being a white guy in 99% black neighborhood, in a 75% black city) I called one of the boys who jumped me a nigger, he can no longer hear out of his left ear, while I am perfectly fine.
 
LovingTongue said:
Wrong. You accused Amicus of being a racist a while back and I told you on the spot that you're in no position to judge him. I more recently posted your nigger remark on there in a poll where almost everyone saw your remark as being a cowardly way to be a racist.

The facts and your arguments are at odds here. As usual.

I don't say on the AH what I say here because there's no reason to. I don't get threatened on the AH, so why would I call anyone a piece of white trash? Amicus threatened me once and I told him in no uncertain terms he'd get his ass broke off if he tried it, or worse. He hasn't threatened me since, and he's despised (though in a very thinly veiled way) over there.

Over here, Amicus would be a fucking war hero.

Oh hell, this is going way over your head. I'm using too many big words with you. This is where you always completely change the discussion and wander off into some other subject and declare spank. You're known for not being able to take someone on directly. Just like when I proved you were a liar when you said I bring race into EVERY discussion, and you went utterly haywire. Along with the rest of the GB.

Heh. Amicus IS racist and misogynist. But those words generally tend to describe bits and pieces of a person who hates themselves. I talk to Amicus the same way I talk to you. Amicus occasionally says things of fairly stunning beauty and insight and I'll say that too. If you say something of stunning beauty and insight, I'd acknowledge it. I'm just still sorta waiting for that one.

You and Amicus share a xenophobia of not wanting to travel to or understand certain viewpoints, for there be dragons. That's okay. To me it seems as silly as still believing the world of social interaction is flat and you're going to sail off the edge if you think certain thoughts.

Race attitudes, reasons for engaging in conversations, strategies for social interaction, yeah, these are big concepts. And no, I am not operating within your set of rules. They don't apply to me in my Universe here, so there's no real reason to. I mean, I'm interested in seeing if you learn and grow, and I'm learning and growing, but I'm not packing myself into that dark, cramped space. Sure, I can visit, but I'm not living there. I'm way past the part where you think I'd have fallen off the edge long ago, and just encouraging you to travel a bit. Really not luring you to your doom.
 
Back
Top