What's the best formula for Group Sex?
- Thread starter HeyAll
- Start date
rjordan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2002
- Posts
- 1,277
Participants > 2 = Group Sex
Changing the independent variable "Participants" doesn't change the formula. It just changes the dependent variable "Group Sex".
Hypoxia
doesn't watch television
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Posts
- 28,080
Group is group, anyone more than a mere couple. What's the upper limit? I wrote once of a 19-woman daisy-chain but that was satirical. More seriously, I wrote of three guys in an anal chain with a girl up front blowing Lucky Louis.
Group includes gang-bangs, cluster-fucks, orgies, trains, lots of people fucking-sucking-slurping in close proximity, etc. Have at it.
Group includes gang-bangs, cluster-fucks, orgies, trains, lots of people fucking-sucking-slurping in close proximity, etc. Have at it.
Last edited:
legerdemer
lost at sea
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Posts
- 7,319
Isn't experimentation part of the fun? Write it well, and readers will cum - oops, come, I meant.
loquere
Smile!
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Posts
- 35,209
-Three bisexual women usually sisters, and one male with a whole bunch of stamina.
-Or for office party gang bang you could go the route of the 'Wolf of Wall street.'
-Cocaine and high priced hookers pleasuring wealthy investment bankers. Everybody taking turn with each hooker.
Last edited:
lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 45,860
have the women act like moronic cum dumpsters who fall to the ground at the word cock and act like the guy is the greatest lover on earth.
there is an author here who has made quite a name for themselves portraying multiple women acting like cumsluts and fawning over dick like its the food of the gods.
give them slutty women with no self respect who like to be gang banged or team up with five friends to gang bang a guy and nothing else will matter to most of the readers there.
Its by far the strokiest readership on the site.
there is an author here who has made quite a name for themselves portraying multiple women acting like cumsluts and fawning over dick like its the food of the gods.
give them slutty women with no self respect who like to be gang banged or team up with five friends to gang bang a guy and nothing else will matter to most of the readers there.
Its by far the strokiest readership on the site.
SusanJillParker
I'm 100% woman
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2011
- Posts
- 2,155
Office party gangbangs? Did you read what you just wrote. First of all to use party and gangbang in the same sentence is not only wrong but also it's oxymoronic.
Secondly, newsflash, unless she's drugged out of her mind and doesn't know what's happening, guess what? No woman wants to be gangbanged unless there's seriously something wrong with her.
Gangbang is not a pleasurable experience for a woman. It hurts. She'll be bruised for weeks. Gangbanging a woman is not sex, it's s violent act and it's sexual abuse.
"Honey," said George. "What would you like for Christmas?"
"I want to be gangbanged. Yeah, that's what I want for Christmas. I want a Christmas gangbang."
"Seriously. I can call 2 or 3 of my friends to see if they'll gangbang you--"
"Two or three? No. I want you to call 12, big, black men to gangbang me."
"Okay," said Donna's husband.
"What about you George? What would you like for Christmas?"
"Is a new razor too much to ask?"
The only women I ever knew who were into gangbangs were weird. Moreover, no normal man would want to have sex with them. Ergo, her need to be gangbanged.
Even normal swingers don't gangbang one another unless there's something seriously wrong with them. Besides, what man would want sloppy 7ths? Eww. Gross.
Hypoxia
doesn't watch television
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Posts
- 28,080
Besides that configuration in a couple tales, I've written that as three incestuously bi sisters, one young male with sufficient energy, and their girlfriend and her mother. The sisters' mother and the girlfriend's father get into the next act, and maybe the guy's sister and/or mom. Years later, the guy runs into the sisters and their girlfriends and female employee but he luckily doesn't have to do all seven of them at once.
I've written of a recreational train where she does a dozen gals and twice as many guys while side action surrounds her. (Not everybody waits for their place in the train.) I wrote of a woman who preferred multiple brain-damaged fuckers. I've written of beach (ocean, lake, and river) orgies, poolside and hot-tub orgies, nude festival orgies, party orgies, and many daisychains. I've written of fuckfests of humans and hybrids. I'm writing one where two families merge; the seven 18-20-yr 'kids' and their fuck-buds (and parents) have at it but not all at once, whew.
Groups are like electric batteries: the more you stick together, the greater the charge and spark.
Weird Harold
Opinionated Old Fart
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2000
- Posts
- 23,768
On a more practical note:
Each character you add to the scene or orgy is going to increase the difficulty of writing the scene. I found that writing a four person sex scene was roughly twice as difficult as writing a threesome. I have written a scene with something like twenty people having sex in various combinations in the same room; that particular abomination will never see publication.
Not because there was anything extraordinarily kinky, but because it proved nearly impossible to keep everything straight.Note that the same thing applies to any group scene; a four-way conversation is more difficult to keep track of than a simple dialogue.
Activities
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Posts
- 18
This is incorrect. There's at least one woman who likes to be gangbanged, or at least she did on one particular occasion. The whole thing was her idea. And as far as I know, there's nothing seriously wrong with her. She just wanted to be gangbanged.
I suspect there might be others, as I've heard stories, but I can only personally vouch for the one.
SamScribble
Yeah, still just a guru
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Posts
- 38,862
In its normal use, 'gangbang' suggests that the gangbangee is at a disadvantage. If your friend 'wanted' to be gangbanged, then I would suggest that she wasn't looking for a gangbang; she was simply looking to have sexual encounters with a succession of partners.
Sorry if I am spoiling anyone's fantasies - but they probably needed spoiling anyway.
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
Wow, that's a hugely sex-negative position to take, and really anti-woman too. A woman has the right to choose whatever sort of sexual outlets that she wants... including getting fucked by a lot of random dudes.
It's not my thing, as I personally think gangbangs are gross, but I don't assume that everyone that wants them has some sort of issues anymore than I think that of someone who loves anal sex (another thing I'm not particularly interested in).
Just because it's not my personal thing, doesn't mean that people engaging in it have something wrong with them.
There are plenty of women out there who have the fantasy of a gangbang, or who have engaged in them don't have "something seriously wrong".
Your anecdotal evidence to the contrary doesn't change that.
I'd be happy to link you to some of their writings, but I'm not sure you'd be able to look past your own prejudice to read it with an open mind.
TxRad
Dirty Old Man
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 45,152
I've tried threes, fours, and mores... They all seem to work, score, about the same.
Listen to Weird Harold, the more people you add the more confusing it gets. I've got one up with eight people and it almost drove me crazy and i had to come up with some very inventive ways to tell people apart.
R. Richard
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2003
- Posts
- 10,382
Some years back, I dated a woman, actually looked like a move star. I found out that her self image required her to get picked up by boys. If it was more than one boy, so be it. In at east one instance, it was three boys. From talking with women who knew about her, the sex was incidental to the need to prove that she was attractive enough to get herself picked up by boys. She was very popular among derelict boys. I split as soon as I realized that the bitch was crazy.
legerdemer
lost at sea
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Posts
- 7,319
I wonder, maybe in those situations, telling people apart is irrelevant ? Limbs are limbs etc and it doesn't matter whose they are and who's who? Just musing out loud.
TxRad
Dirty Old Man
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 45,152
Limbs are limbs but the story isn't about limbs. It's about the people involved and attached to the limbs. It's not just the sex. It's the interaction of who and whom. It's the emotions and feelings. Otherwise it's just a fuck fest with no rhyme or reason. Other than sex and titillation.
My way of looking at it in any case.
Hypoxia
doesn't watch television
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Posts
- 28,080
Sometime they're bit players. I have a beach-party scene with a three-man standing bugger-chain and a girl up front blowing Lucky Louis. The three guys are totally replaceable so I just describe them as surfer-types. No further identification is needed.
I must pay more attention when the players are named and described. In a big bedroom scene Judy's mother Muriel (both chestnut-haired) pegs her pale dentist husband Ted with a strap-on while he fucks his daughter; the three blonde next-door Heinecke sisters (Faith, Hope, and Ann) are throbbing in a daisychain; and tall, lean, dark-haired Ron is doggie-fucking Mediterranean goddess Maria. Then they switch around. A bit of choreography is needed to keep them straight, story-wise. And eight is probably the limit, although I might be able to squeeze in Mrs Heinecke and Faith's black g.f. Sofia too.
And each joining is a separate incident, with each participant feeling and tasting and thinking on their own. Each relationship is distinct -- although I may gloss-over the details to build a sensuous image.
More characters work in longer stories when they've had time and space to be introduced, for the reader to form a mental image of them. Most of the two or three dozen fuckers in a short orgy piece will necessarily be spear-carriers. When the football team engages the cheer squad we'll only focus on the quarterback and the cheer queen; the others are entertaining background.
Last edited:
geronimo_appleby
always on the move
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 90,768
i sometimes use pornstars to keep track of who's who!
TxRad
Dirty Old Man
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 45,152
But the porn stars you know might not be the ones I know.
In any case, I like my characters to be more real than porn stars.
geronimo_appleby
always on the move
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 90,768
But the porn stars you know might not be the ones I know.
i dunno, you've been around for awhile.
TxRad
Dirty Old Man
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 45,152
i dunno, you've been around for awhile.
I'm far more interested in the Amateurs than the Pros.
geronimo_appleby
always on the move
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- Posts
- 90,768
TxRad
Dirty Old Man
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Posts
- 45,152
charlie sheen wasn't.
And look what happened to him.
tomlitilia
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2011
- Posts
- 845
I'm pretty sure that the best formula for group sex is C2H5OH
Sadly, I got that one
