Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
Hats off to anyone with the balls and self-awareness to withstand mainstream social pressure and live in accordance with his or her own core identity. In that sense, I do consider poly to be enlightened.
On the other hand, blanket assertions about the fundamental superiority of one's sexual identity over other identity types seem reflective of a certain insecurity that, ideally, one would eventually be able to overcome.
Absolutely, but there *is* a phase that sexual minorities go through that I affectionately label the "three bean salad" phase, where you have a lot of potluck meetings, and poke your head out and realize that you're more than one person, and try to come to grips with the upside of your identity. Imagine having no upside to your identity presented to you until your early 20's or much later in a lot of cases.
All that exuberance can be pretty freaking obnoxious, whether you're outside the "wow aren't we SO cool" demographic or more comfortably ensconced in it, for sure. But I'm simply trying to remind people that the place it comes from is pretty dark and isolated.
And also, that having alternate relationship structures (I myself kind of find "polyamorous" to be a weird label I'm unsure I like) means you are, at least at this point in time, going to have to give up on some pretty important legitimacy in the eyes of others. Simple things like your plus one tickets and your hospital room become problematic, every SINGLE day you are out you are treated to sage wisdom that your loves will only end in tears from whomever you're being honest with, it starts to become onerous to the point where you need to flip the platitudes around to stay sane.