Wayne LaPierre Found Liable for Corruption? Say It Ain't So!

He's going to have to hock a couple of those suits the NRA bought him to get out of this mess.
 
I think this is fantastic news. Wayne La Pierre and his corrupt cronies are exactly why I haven't been an NRA member for over 30 years. His management style and playing fast and loose with the NRA's money drove many people away. Add to that when you are a member you get absolutely pounded with requests for more money. Hell even as a long time non-member I regularly got mail asking me to re-join the NRA and included were so called gifts for donations above and beyond your membership dues. Corrupt as hell and it was obvious to so many. How he got away with it for 30 years is a huge mystery.
 
I think this is fantastic news. Wayne La Pierre and his corrupt cronies are exactly why I haven't been an NRA member for over 30 years. His management style and playing fast and loose with the NRA's money drove many people away. Add to that when you are a member you get absolutely pounded with requests for more money. Hell even as a long time non-member I regularly got mail asking me to re-join the NRA and included were so called gifts for donations above and beyond your membership dues. Corrupt as hell and it was obvious to so many. How he got away with it for 30 years is a huge mystery.
As a liberal Democrat, mostly progressive but not extreme, I do support Second Amendment rights, but with sensible regulations, as the vast majority of Americans do, including my fellow Democrats. But in my interest in the issue (I will not claim to be an expert or a scholar on the topic), I've read that the NRA stopped representing the interests of its own members years ago, and now solely represents the interests of the gun manufacturers (and, obviously, their own financial interests). It's a shame that a genuine, once proud and honorable American institution, became twisted and perverted in the hands of grifter assholes like LaPierre. Last I heard, the NRA was virtually bankrupt, thanks to shrinking membership and mismanagement of organizational funds.

Perhaps the organization can survive the corruption and scandal of today and emerge as a renewed stalwart in representing the constitutional rights of gun owners, not fighting for the profitability of the gun manufacturers. I do believe there is a place for such an organization, although I will continue to vote for stricter gun regulation myself.
 
the majority of nra members are made up of trumpers and susceptible to the dumbest scams.

who are also against unions.

which the nra essentially is.

because lol.
 
the majority of nra members are made up of trumpers and susceptible to the dumbest scams.

who are also against unions.

which the nra essentially is.

because lol.
Since this is the battle cry of you commie libs every time I post something...Data to substantiate what you are claiming here or it is nothing but lies pulled from the deepest recesses of your ass.

I'm a strong Union advocate and honestly have been thinking of starting a Union drive where I work.

By the way, I haven't been an NRA member from long before Wayne La Pierre's reign of corruption began.
 
Since this is the battle cry of you commie libs every time I post something...Data to substantiate what you are claiming here or it is nothing but lies pulled from the deepest recesses of your ass.
If you're claiming that the majority of NRA members are NOT gullible MAGA idiots, I would say put up your own data or shut up.
I'm a strong Union advocate and honestly have been thinking of starting a Union drive where I work.
If you're a Republican, then that makes one of you.
 
You can't prove your point by asking me to disprove it. You made the statement now put up or admit you you can't support it with any evidence.

Independent through and through. Again prove I'm not. Essentially you can't other than by postings here and that is hardly definitive.
 
You can't prove your point by asking me to disprove it. You made the statement now put up or admit you you can't support it with any evidence.

Independent through and through. Again prove I'm not. Essentially you can't other than by postings here and that is hardly definitive.
I didn't actually make the claim that you are disputing, so I don't have to put up shit for you. And since all we have to go on is your postings here, those will have to serve as definitive. You may consider yourself to be independent, but calling anyone "commie libs" is pretty indicative of which team you play for.
 
Trump campaigned at an NRA event. There aren't any signs of him giving speeches at BLM events, I checked for you.
 
you quoted me, bitchfuck.

show me da data!

no you haven't.
You're right I did. And YOU are a commie lib because you believe in your way only with no compromise. You would love to see the end of all opposition to your viewpoint, you know kind of like Stalin, or Mao, or Pol Pot, or even Putin. I can see both sides of things and sometimes I lean a bit left and sometimes I lean a bit right, but I firmly cling to the middle ground so I can see both sides.

You go into your rant because you can't substantiate anything you have claimed. It's just more propaganda that you want to scream loud enough so pretty soon more will believe your Bull Shit. If you had date to prove it you would supply it. Don't you ever get tired of being a lying piece of shit?

Really? You listened to my conversation with co-workers about this topic? So now you are Big Brother spying on people. Just like a good commie would so you can decide who to send to the gulag.

You really are a sad little man whose whole life is trying to bully people on the internet. If you weren't such an asshole I might actually pity you. But you are, so I don't.
 
I didn't actually make the claim that you are disputing, so I don't have to put up shit for you. And since all we have to go on is your postings here, those will have to serve as definitive. You may consider yourself to be independent, but calling anyone "commie libs" is pretty indicative of which team you play for.
You can have liberal beliefs without believing everyone else is always wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of trying to silence others you are in fact a commie lib. You can have right leaning beliefs without believing everyone is wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of silencing others you are a fascist. I listen to both sides and make up my own mind.
 
What took them so long.

The worst thing a gun owner can do is put his name on a list of gun owners.
 
You can have liberal beliefs without believing everyone else is always wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of trying to silence others you are in fact a commie lib. You can have right leaning beliefs without believing everyone is wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of silencing others you are a fascist. I listen to both sides and make up my own mind.
What have I said that makes you think I only listen to one side and only accept things my way? But let's be honest, we all have our entrenched opinions on most topics, and opinions and beliefs from those who believe the opposite aren't likely to sway us.
 
You can have liberal beliefs without believing everyone else is always wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of trying to silence others you are in fact a commie lib. You can have right leaning beliefs without believing everyone is wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of silencing others you are a fascist. I listen to both sides and make up my own mind.
If you'll reread my posts, I admit that I'm a liberal Democrat, and I do support stricter common-sense gun regulation. But I also said that I do see value in an honorable gun rights organization. Does any of that sound unreasonable or even fascistic to you?
 
If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of trying to silence others you are in fact a commie lib.
If you believe only "commie libs" (at least be original, won't you?) are entrenched in their beliefs and try to silence all other opinion, then you obviously haven't been paying attention to the far right, who are on some kind of holy crusade to suppress the opinions and lifestyles of more than half of the country.
 
You're right I did. And YOU are a commie lib because you believe in your way only with no compromise. You would love to see the end of all opposition to your viewpoint, you know kind of like Stalin, or Mao, or Pol Pot, or even Putin. I can see both sides of things and sometimes I lean a bit left and sometimes I lean a bit right, but I firmly cling to the middle ground so I can see both sides.

You go into your rant because you can't substantiate anything you have claimed. It's just more propaganda that you want to scream loud enough so pretty soon more will believe your Bull Shit. If you had date to prove it you would supply it. Don't you ever get tired of being a lying piece of shit?

Really? You listened to my conversation with co-workers about this topic? So now you are Big Brother spying on people. Just like a good commie would so you can decide who to send to the gulag.

You really are a sad little man whose whole life is trying to bully people on the internet. If you weren't such an asshole I might actually pity you. But you are, so I don't.
jajajajaja!
 
... You can have right leaning beliefs without believing everyone is wrong. If you believe your way is the only way to the extreme of silencing others you are a fascist. I listen to both sides and make up my own mind.

So you don't think that we on the left are wrong. (y)
 
If you believe only "commie libs" (at least be original, won't you?) are entrenched in their beliefs and try to silence all other opinion, then you obviously haven't been paying attention to the far right, who are on some kind of holy crusade to suppress the opinions and lifestyles of more than half of the country.
Propagandist edit of my original comment. My point is proven. Thank you.
 
Back
Top