UN Official Admitted Global Warming Agenda Is Really About Destroying Capitalism

[hashtag46]

I might be late to the party and these might be hardly news yo many. Nevertheless: .

UN Official Admits Global Warming Agenda Is Really About Destroying Capitalism
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-is-about-destroying-capitalism/

"United Nations official Christiana Figueres admitted at a news conference in Brussels that the Global Warming conspiracy set by the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, of which she is the executive secretary, has a goal not of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity, but to destroy capitalism.

She said very casually: “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”

I was invited to a major political dinner in Washington … . [… ]Low and behold, they too admitted [that… The truth behind their movement] was not about the environment, but to reduce population growth."

 

[hashtag46]

The author's interpretation of her comments are of course debatable.
But regardless of which is the chicken and which is the egg, or what angle one might choose when interpreting her comments:

1.A well intended goal of combatting the - real - danger of global warming or poverty
- by gradually replacing a socio- economic system perceived to have been harmful (capitalism) with a system perceived to be more helpful (socialism or globalization or whatever)

2.Or radical ideologues (neoliberal corporatist globalists) using the global warming - hoax - to promote their utopia ( a communist /neofeudalistic hybrid).

3.Or just because Western economy is collapsing

The UN pointed out a state of affairs that was already clear to most:
The deliberate intent to change the socio - economic system worldwide.

 

[Liar]

Whoever wrote that have no clue what they're talking about.

The "economic development model" they talk about changing is more likely exponential energy consumption as the fuel for economic growth, which has been the reigning model since the Industrial Revolution, whether there has been capitalism or communism slapped on top of that.

 

[hashtag46]

Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov (1939 – 1993), was a russian journalist and a former KGB informant from the Soviet Union who defected to Canada in 1970.


Yuri Bezmenov on The 4 stages of ideological subversion :


1.Excerpts from interview - first aired in 1985 in Canada):
http://www.smashculturalmarxism.com/the-four-stages-of-ideological-subversion/

"Stage 1 — Demoralization
The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last twenty-five years.
Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to access true information.

Stage 2 — Destabilization
This time — and it takes only from two to five years to destabilize a nation — what matters is essentials. Economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process would go that fast.

Stage 3 — Crisis
Stage 4 — Normalization"



2.Links to full interview and transcript:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=139025.0

 

[KingOrfeo]

2.Or radical ideologues (neoliberal corporatist globalists) using the global warming - hoax - to promote their utopia ( a communist /neofeudalistic hybrid).

Neoliberalism has been the Washington Consensus for decades, there's nothing radical about it.

 

[hashtag46]

Neoliberalism has been the Washington Consensus for decades, there's nothing radical about it.

Since the 70's with Margaret Thatcher and so on.

And lately, the European Union

 

[Wrong Element]

Whoever wrote that have no clue what they're talking about.

The "economic development model" they talk about changing is more likely exponential energy consumption as the fuel for economic growth, which has been the reigning model since the Industrial Revolution, whether there has been capitalism or communism slapped on top of that.

This obviously makes a lot more sense.

We'll leave aside the other obvious problem with this thread, which is that researchers into the issue of climate change aren't taking their orders from the U.N., regardless of what paranoids may think.

 

[hashtag46]

Whoever wrote that have no clue what they're talking about.

The "economic development model" they talk about changing is more likely exponential energy consumption as the fuel for economic growth, which has been the reigning model since the Industrial Revolution, whether there has been capitalism or communism slapped on top of that.

Yeah, you're making sense, and now Amstrong's interpretation of the UN official's words now look to me as being a bit stretched and foolish.



Nevertheless, the idea is that the socio - economic system that the Western world thought they were living within has changed and is still changing.

And add to the means of ideological subversion mentioned by Bezmenov,
indoctrination of the young, the perpetual state of fear (the external boogeymen: Saddam Hussein then, now Russia, or climate change and so on), and internal crises and the constant irregular warfare etc.

 

[Liar]

Breaking News: Things change.

 

[hashtag46]

Breaking News: Things change.

What do you think of Yuri Bezmenov's comments (from 1985), tho?
Particularly this one:
"You can see quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic."

 

[Liar]

What do you think of Yuri Bezmenov's comments (from 1985), tho?

Nothing at all. Political navel gazing intellectualism gives me involuntary eye twitches.

 

[OldJourno]

Few years back one of the global warming knuckleheads spoke freely about the whole movement revolving around wealth redistribution.
No one can explain why sending U.S. taxpayer money to Third World countries will help solve our fabricated climate crisis.

 

[KingOrfeo]

What do you think of Yuri Bezmenov's comments (from 1985), tho?

Not much. They have no current relevance.

 

[hashtag46]

Not much. They have no current relevance.

But they had relevance to what was happening in the 80's, and the 80's have relevance to what's happening today.
Memory and history are important.

 

[Rightguide]

It's been known to be a method of shaking down western economies for the benefit of the Third World. More Marxist income redistribution.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The cofounder of Greenpeace agrees!



After the fall of the wall, the commies had to go somewhere.


And the point is valid, those "climatologists" are in it for the funding and governments are funding them...

 

[KingOrfeo]

But they had relevance to what was happening in the 80's, and the 80's have relevance to what's happening today.
Memory and history are important.

The USSR existed in the '80s. No one today is using such tactics.

 

[KingOrfeo]

It's been known to be a method of shaking down western economies for the benefit of the Third World. More Marxist income redistribution.

Don't see how carbon-emissions regs funnel money to the 3rd World.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

But they had relevance to what was happening in the 80's, and the 80's have relevance to what's happening today.
Memory and history are important.

*chuckle*


Good luck with that. You are about to learn that a leopard changes its spots constantly...

 

[hashtag46]

The USSR existed in the '80s. No one today is using such tactics.

You don't think so?

The techniques of influencing the opinion of individuals or masses of individuals must be similar, regardless of intended regime change or decade or even century.
Because people are people, regardless.

For example: Compare Yuri Bezmenov's talk on Ideological Subversion, to Noam Chomski's description of Techniques of manipulation, and you'll find earie simlarities. And I bet that if we research other thinkers across countries or time periods, we'll find similar descriptions.

 

[KingOrfeo]

You don't think so?

No, I don't think anyone is using Marxist-Leninist "ideological subversion" tactics in connection with climate change or anything else. Perhaps the Russian spooks working in the Ukraine use some version highly modified to serve Russian nationalism, but that is such a qualitatively different ideology that its potential is limited.

 

[hashtag46]

No, I don't think anyone is using Marxist-Leninist "ideological subversion" tactics in connection with climate change or anything else. Perhaps the Russian spooks working in the Ukraine use some version highly modified to serve Russian nationalism, but that is such a qualitatively different ideology that its potential is limited.

Let's leave the Climate Change.

Look at the indoctrination in colleges and universities.
Both socialism (only for the middle class and working class, Not for the rich) and neoliberalism (teaching them to see themselves as commodities for the market).
So to speak.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Let's leave the Climate Change.

Look at the indoctrination in colleges and universities.

 

[hashtag46]

Now don't pull a P.A.
You brought up the Climate Change issue, and I suggested to talk about something else.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Now don't pull a P.A.
You brought up the Climate Change issue, and I suggested to talk about something else.

You brought up the climate change issue, in the OP, and then you tried to change the subject to some dishonest bullshit about campus indoctrination.