JohnnySavage
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Posts
- 44,472
Hmmm. Some of us remember the last Republican presidential candidate who campaigned as a moderate despite all the conservative support he was receiving, who denied that he favored a budget-busting tax cut for the wealthy, and who promised he would work with Democrats and heal the partisan divide in America.
Romney might actually be a moderate temperamentally, but the key point about him is that he doesn't believe in anything except 1) keeping his own taxes low and 2) getting elected. Everything else is unimportant to him, which is why I've been saying here for over a year that I don't expect a Romney presidency to do any more than, as Grover Norquist said, sit there and sign legislation sent to him by the Tea Party House.
As for the question of whether the debate changed anything, probably not. Almost everyone has their mind made up already, and there's literally no example of a challenger coming from behind to win the presidency as a result of winning debates. Besides, the jobs report has got everyone thinking of substance rather than style again.
Now, if Obama chooses to unilaterally disarm in the final two debates, including the town hall format where he ought to have the clear advantage over someone with the emotional intelligence of HAL 9000, I might want to revisit this opinion.
That presupposes that there will be a Republican super-majority in the Senate; which isn't going to happen.
Which, in turn, makes all the grand proclamations of policy interesting, but unrealistic. Neither side will have the votes in Congress to push through the agenda they are running on.
