Twitter Is About To Change

It's in plain sight. Look at stock price big variations and then go find his tweets.

It's not by accident.
You had to read some press crap to figure that out? Sorry dude, but what he was doing, and why, was obvious from damn near the beginning. There's no way in hell that Twitter was worth $44 billion and Musk wasn't about to piss away that much money just because he's a "free speech" fanatic. The game is a hell of a lot bigger than that.
 
You had to read some press crap to figure that out? Sorry dude, but what he was doing, and why, was obvious from damn near the beginning. There's no way in hell that Twitter was worth $44 billion and Musk wasn't about to piss away that much money just because he's a "free speech" fanatic. The game is a hell of a lot bigger than that.
So you support his manipulation.

Got it
 
Support? I know the game and how it's played. If you don't know a ball from a strike it's your problem. Learn the game.
He shouldn't have advantages to the game.

Manipulating stock he owns or intends to buy, s shit....regardless of whether you know the "game". SEC should be regulating that.

To me, you're supporting him because of your political position
 
He shouldn't have advantages to the game.

Manipulating stock he owns or intends to buy, s shit....regardless of whether you know the "game". SEC should be regulating that.

To me, you're supporting him because of your political position
Free speech my friend. You aren't obligated to listen, or believe.
 
He's using social media to manipulate pricing.
Jesus fucking Christ, EVERYONE uses social media to manipulate pricing. You think the ads you see are there so people WON'T buy the products/ideas and therefore increase company value?
 
Jesus fucking Christ, EVERYONE uses social media to manipulate pricing. You think the ads you see are there so people WON'T buy the products/ideas and therefore increase company value?
Aah yes...the "everyone is doing it" defense of unethical behavior.

😎 Cool
 
Support? I know the game and how it's played. If you don't know a ball from a strike it's your problem. Learn the game.
Since when, NostraDumbass? You're failed predictions are your most endearing quality. ;)
Free speech my friend. You aren't obligated to listen, or believe.
Just like private businesses are not forced to provide a safe haven for dumbfuckery.
Aah yes...the "everyone is doing it" defense of unethical behavior.

😎 Cool
It's the same as the "The first KKK members were Dems!" defense for killing innocent black people in 2022.
 
As reported today in the WSJ, Twitter HAS changed.

Elon Musk’s Planned Twitter Takeover Creates a ‘Chaos Tax’ for Employees​

Deal has left employees bewildered about what their jobs are and will be​


“Whatever the fate of the deal, many current and former employees say the company has been irrevocably shaped by the five weeks since Mr. Musk publicly disclosed his unsolicited bid to buy Twitter, one of the world’s most influential social-media platforms.”

“Some employees described the changes as stressful on an internal Slack channel.”

“Twitter shares are down more than 25% since late April.”

“Mr. Agrawal told employees this month that the company has so far fallen short of audience and revenue growth targets set in early 2020.”
 
The object all along was to take Twitter down, make it go bye bye! Its well on its way! Thank you Elon!
 
If you're not on the platform,why do you care?
Because we all kmow now, Twatter was never a real company, it was introduced to censor and monitor its members! Elon has forced them to admit that themselves! Thats the funniest part! Over 20% bots! Its out and everyone knows it now! And if you think sensorship of any kind is OK, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM!!
 
Because we all kmow now, Twatter was never a real company, it was introduced to censor and monitor its members! Elon has forced them to admit that themselves! Thats the funniest part! Over 20% bots! Its out and everyone knows it now! And if you think sensorship of any kind is OK, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM!!
It is a real private company. If you are on their platform and they decide they don't want you there, they can remove you. Same thing happens at a restaurant if you walk in without a shirt on.

But I guess if you want to believe in bullshit, then logic of any sort tends to go over your head.
 
Because we all kmow now, Twatter was never a real company, it was introduced to censor and monitor its members! Elon has forced them to admit that themselves! Thats the funniest part! Over 20% bots! Its out and everyone knows it now! And if you think sensorship of any kind is OK, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM!!
Spittle.
 
It is a real private company. If you are on their platform and they decide they don't want you there, they can remove you. Same thing happens at a restaurant if you walk in without a shirt on.

But I guess if you want to believe in bullshit, then logic of any sort tends to go over your head.
Your "logic" has several holes in it.

For example:

If I go into a restaurant and decide to order a steak, the restaurant doesn't throw me out and bar me for life if I want my steak well done instead of med-rare like the restaurant prefers to serve it.

OTOH, Twitter INVITES people to come and comment on their private company system but then bans those who comment in ways the company doesn't like.

These 2 things may sound the same, but they are not. The fact that you cannot, or refuse to, see that is where the problem lies.
 
Your "logic" has several holes in it.

For example:

If I go into a restaurant and decide to order a steak, the restaurant doesn't throw me out and bar me for life if I want my steak well done instead of med-rare like the restaurant prefers to serve it.

OTOH, Twitter INVITES people to come and comment on their private company system but then bans those who comment in ways the company doesn't like.

These 2 things may sound the same, but they are not. The fact that you cannot, or refuse to, see that is where the problem lies.
Twitter has the right to ban it's members. If you don't like it....don't use it.
 
But, to further the example, a private company is subject to truth in labeling laws and
if they fill your steak order with turkey and assure you that's it's a ribeye,
then they are breaking the law just as when Twitter proclaims
we are a free speech platform unless you are a conservative.
All conservatives do is engage in hate speech;
the things that "offend" us,

but if free speech cannot offend, then it is not free speech.
Sometimes people just need to hear stuff.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Twitter has the right to ban it's members. If you don't like it....don't use it.
The hypothetical restaurant I outlined has a right to refuse service too.

Of course when you INVITE people to participate in your business enterprise, then tell them that they're evil and not wanted because they don't conform to your personal ideals/politics, you have a business model problem called bigotry and segregationism. Screaming and pointing the finger of shame at those whom you refuse to include in your circle jerk only underscores your bigotry and segregationist problem.

IOW, it's not us, it's you who is the racist/supremacist/hater. The louder you scream and the more vehemently you protest that it's us while concurrently refusing to let us play in your sandbox, only proves the point.
 
But, to further the example, a private company is subject to truth in labeling laws and
if they fill your steak order with turkey and assure you that's it's a ribeye,
then they are breaking the law just as when Twitter proclaims
we are a free speech platform unless you are a conservative.
All conservatives do is engage in hate speech;
the things that "offend" us,

but if free speech cannot offend, then it is not free speech.
Sometimes people just need to hear stuff.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
Like all things, the SCOTUS had it correct when they created "quasi public speech." Then the libs came along and fucked it all up and now we have no right to public speech at all. Because, somehow speech isn't speech if it's electronically transmitted between you and me, but it's still speech (and protected) if it's electronically transmitted by a "preferred" sender over the same transmission system and carrier.
 
They can't help themselves.
They got the highest priced and government subsidized indoctrination that money can buy.

They think they are right and occupy the moral high ground and everyone else has to be the bad guy(s).

#12 Assume the Moral High Ground. Facts and truths are messy and hard. The Progressives feel they own the moral high ground and flaunt that position often. They are out to save the planet, which means their opponents are clearly out to destroy it.
The Democrat Party Playbook
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Back
Top