1sickbastard
Seriously?
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Posts
- 26,724
Yes.
I said it.
Schools are institutions that are supposed to be devoted to teaching and learning. Physical education, such as teaching the young how to develop, care for and maintain a healthy body is all well as good, but give me any good reason competitive team sports are vital to the education process which cannot be achieved by privately funded after school programs.
I'm going to focus specifically on two sports, the main two sports which seem to occupy much of the American attention and divert significant resources away from actual academics; football and basketball. Other sports, track and field, baseball, soccer and hockey are also culpable and the list is by no means inclusive.
The main arguments for team sports seem to be this: They develop teamwork and foster leadership. Secondary arguments are for the revenues and scholarships.
For the first two arguments, I will counter argue that teamwork and leadership are primarily mental and character abilities that can be fostered by other means. School sponsored community projects can do for teamwork, as can simple ropes courses and group academic and technical projects, student body government (which helps with leadership) and the promotion of student created and/or managed small businesses. As a plus, the students will also learn practical skills easily transferable to life after academia.
For the secondary arguments, I will venture that many, if not most school districts spend inordinate amounts of taxpayer money to support team sports. football fields, baseball diamonds, basketball fields, swimming pools, hockey rinks aren't free, aren't cheap, and are only paid for through direct taxation or the issuance of bonds. One is a direct affront to those who pay taxes, the other only increases gov't debt. Both remove capital from the economy which can be used more productively.
As for the scholarship argument, why shouldn't the professional sport provide those scholarships?
Specifically for football and basketball, and to a lesser extent, baseball and the other pro sports, why should those scholarships be tied to academia? For pro football and basketball, it means they have no real functioning minor league system other than the NCAA.
Someone explain to me why the NBA and the NFL should not administer their own minor league systems and offer prospective athletes scholarships so they can attend institutions of higher education during the off season? More to the point, why is it that many state universities divert public funds to support billion dollar industries? (I'll exempt private colleges/schools because they are NOT on the taxpayers' dollars.)
I believe the benefits would vastly outweigh the liabilities. Private institutions (pro sports franchises/leagues) can (and will) offer after school programs, much the same as pee-wee sports leagues (which are not attached to schools).
The practice of giving 'jocks' special entitlements, grades, and blow off courses becomes null as the school no longer has any vested interest in winning some trophy. Student are then expected to perform academically and their physical prowess is no longer a consideration. So-called 'student athletes' are no longer given 'special considerations or allowances for disruptive behaviors. Their sense of entitlement and privilege will no longer extend into their academic development.
At higher levels, the two sports of basketball and football develop a robust minor league system, much like MLB an the NHL have. Lose a player from injury or misbehavior? Instead of having a short roster, the team in the big leagues has the option of bringing up talent from the minors.
Interested in everyone's' thoughts and looking forward (hopefully) to a reasoned debate.
I said it.
Schools are institutions that are supposed to be devoted to teaching and learning. Physical education, such as teaching the young how to develop, care for and maintain a healthy body is all well as good, but give me any good reason competitive team sports are vital to the education process which cannot be achieved by privately funded after school programs.
I'm going to focus specifically on two sports, the main two sports which seem to occupy much of the American attention and divert significant resources away from actual academics; football and basketball. Other sports, track and field, baseball, soccer and hockey are also culpable and the list is by no means inclusive.
The main arguments for team sports seem to be this: They develop teamwork and foster leadership. Secondary arguments are for the revenues and scholarships.
For the first two arguments, I will counter argue that teamwork and leadership are primarily mental and character abilities that can be fostered by other means. School sponsored community projects can do for teamwork, as can simple ropes courses and group academic and technical projects, student body government (which helps with leadership) and the promotion of student created and/or managed small businesses. As a plus, the students will also learn practical skills easily transferable to life after academia.
For the secondary arguments, I will venture that many, if not most school districts spend inordinate amounts of taxpayer money to support team sports. football fields, baseball diamonds, basketball fields, swimming pools, hockey rinks aren't free, aren't cheap, and are only paid for through direct taxation or the issuance of bonds. One is a direct affront to those who pay taxes, the other only increases gov't debt. Both remove capital from the economy which can be used more productively.
As for the scholarship argument, why shouldn't the professional sport provide those scholarships?
Specifically for football and basketball, and to a lesser extent, baseball and the other pro sports, why should those scholarships be tied to academia? For pro football and basketball, it means they have no real functioning minor league system other than the NCAA.
Someone explain to me why the NBA and the NFL should not administer their own minor league systems and offer prospective athletes scholarships so they can attend institutions of higher education during the off season? More to the point, why is it that many state universities divert public funds to support billion dollar industries? (I'll exempt private colleges/schools because they are NOT on the taxpayers' dollars.)
I believe the benefits would vastly outweigh the liabilities. Private institutions (pro sports franchises/leagues) can (and will) offer after school programs, much the same as pee-wee sports leagues (which are not attached to schools).
The practice of giving 'jocks' special entitlements, grades, and blow off courses becomes null as the school no longer has any vested interest in winning some trophy. Student are then expected to perform academically and their physical prowess is no longer a consideration. So-called 'student athletes' are no longer given 'special considerations or allowances for disruptive behaviors. Their sense of entitlement and privilege will no longer extend into their academic development.
At higher levels, the two sports of basketball and football develop a robust minor league system, much like MLB an the NHL have. Lose a player from injury or misbehavior? Instead of having a short roster, the team in the big leagues has the option of bringing up talent from the minors.
Interested in everyone's' thoughts and looking forward (hopefully) to a reasoned debate.