YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 11,086
No, they didn't. I could tell you what they really voted for, but you can do your own homework.California just voted to ban diesel trucks by 2030.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, they didn't. I could tell you what they really voted for, but you can do your own homework.California just voted to ban diesel trucks by 2030.
Sorry, the original article I saw said 2030 it's 2036:No, they didn't. I could tell you what they really voted for, but you can do your own homework.
The date isn't all you got wrong. (Hint: it's right in the URL of your new link.)Sorry, the original article I saw said 2030 it's 2036:
https://notthebee.com/article/california-bans-sale-of-new-diesel-trucks-after-2036
At any rate, it will fail because it can't be done unless they want to totally rebuild the electrical infrastructure in the next 14 years. No matter what their fantasy is, it will fail. Just like Biden's electric vehicles for the military will never happen either.
I've taken her failure to do so as a reflection of her loss of mental capacity. She hadn't been clear on the voting for some time. She is seriously disrupting the party's program and has nothing to gain personally by staying. Those around her should be coaxing her to retire--and purpose they are trying to do so.I don't understand why she isn't retiring.
I don't understand why she isn't retiring.
in these situations, wouldn't it be a good idea for Senators to have like an understudy who can be used to take over the excess from reduced workloads while working WITH the member to make sure they are acting on their behalf and not independently to a different agenda? Don't the voters these people represent deserve ACTUAL representation? This would have also applied in the case of Fetterman and any other major player in the country's businessThe California senator cautioned in statement emailed to reporters that she would likely have to reduce her workload for the time being. Feinstein is experiencing some side effects from shingles that have affected her vision and balance, according to her statement.
“My doctors have advised me to work a lighter schedule as I return to the Senate,” Feinstein said in the statement. “I’m hopeful those issues will subside as I continue to recover.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...31&cvid=7001dd9d8a4d4e89aa247fd800986545&ei=6Senate Democrats advanced three of President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees along party lines Thursday after weeks of delay due to California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s extended absence.
With Feinstein back in the Senate, and voting in the committee, the panel approved three federal district court judge nominations that had been stalled: Charnelle Bjelkengren of Washington state, S. Kato Crews of Colorado and Marian Gaston of California.
Saw that. Like your wife, not pretty.A Brief, Concerning Conversation with Dianne Feinstein
The senator seems to not remember being absent from the Capitol.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/dianne-feinstein-health-return-to-senate.html
If all you’re capable of are insults, knock yourself out.Saw that. Like your wife, not pretty.
it's not fair to say she's not been working this entire time, though: she has been working from home and eve, as i understand it, some time in her office. How that compares, workload-wise, to being on the House floor i don't know, but it did mean she missed at least one important vote.
She's a senator, so she wouldn't be on the House floor. The real issues are two--grasping what is at stake in positioning voting. She has shown for some time an inability to grasp the legislation before her or to just follow trusted staff guidance on votes, and she hasn't been able to show up for key votes when her vote was key.it's not fair to say she's not been working this entire time, though: she has been working from home and eve, as i understand it, some time in her office. How that compares, workload-wise, to being on the House floor i don't know, but it did mean she missed at least one important vote.
The Senate floor actually……
yes, yes, the Senate floor... i was rushing and misspokeShe's a senator, so she wouldn't be on the House floor.
She retires now, the Democratic governor replaces her until the next election. Obviously, it would be a Democrat and several seasoned ones have hats in the ring already.yes, yes, the Senate floor... i was rushing and misspoke
i don't disagree with your summary of her abilities, necessarily, was just questioning the whole 'absence from work' point
so... if she does retire, will another dem automatically assume her position or can that be blocked from moving forward by republicans till i don't know when?
so it couldn't be delayed or blocked at all?She retires now, the Democratic governor replaces her until the next election. Obviously, it would be a Democrat and several seasoned ones have hats in the ring already.
Nope. No blocking. It's a State right, controlled by the governor. He needs no approval for a temporary appointment from anyone else in the state, and the U.S. congress has no role in a temporary appointment of a U.S. senator.so it couldn't be delayed or blocked at all?
thankyou for the information, Keith. As you know, i'm still learning all this stuff, day to day.