This sort of rule would absolutely cripple the General Board

Raise your hand if you are shocked Rob was the first to notice a rule change at a dating site for losers.


On a side note; it is a shame he noticed it said 14 years. His fat black heart almost stopped when he thought it said 14 pounds overweight.
 
Raise your hand if you are shocked Rob was the first to notice a rule change at a dating site for losers.


On a side note; it is a shame he noticed it said 14 years. His fat black heart almost stopped when he thought it said 14 pounds overweight.

Can your daughter count to potato yet?
 
3198.jpg
[/img]
 
I know there is such a thing but it absolutely shocks me. Perhaps, too long on mommy's breast.

Nah, they just want experienced lovers and they think we might want them because their refractory period is still fairly short.
 
Among other changes, people with an age gap of more than 14 years can’t contact each other and sexual messages sent to and from user accounts on first contact are filtered out by an automated system picking up on key words.
I'm sure they consider women to be people, so they apparently can't either.
But it's not 100% clear. It sounds like it's only sexual messages and that other messages are ok.
 
In reading the link in the original post, I am not sure how eliminating the intimate encounter area of POF will stop guys from using it just to get laid. Having a special section meant you could check if they were in that area too, and somewhat determine their interests.
 
I'm sure they consider women to be people, so they apparently can't either.
But it's not 100% clear. It sounds like it's only sexual messages and that other messages are ok.

My apologies, I originally linked to a site called Blue Canada but it is blocked or doesn't resolve correctly here. I relinked to another news account and you are correct it was gender-neutral unlike my first link attempt.
 
Back
Top