The War Media and their own spin

[busybody..]

We get so much news from the media.....

They seem to cover just about everything imaginable.....

With great detail, right down to the MRE's the guys eat.....

Yet.....

There seems to be NO STORIES whatsoever that has explored

The killings of American soldiers and wounding of American soldiers......

By one of their own.....

If the 101st Airborne murderer would have been a white supremicist, would we have had many stories discussing him and his motives? You bet!

Yet, the PC Media has been quiet, no stories, no speculation....

Because the guy IS A BLACK MUSLIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Media whitewash? Deliberate attempt to hide the festering problem of Muslim infiltration of the US military?

Why cant we get the real news from the media instead of just their own spin version?

What are they afraid of????????

 

[Somme]

hmmm...ever thought that censorship was dead?

 

[badasschick]

Busy,


Get a job!

 

[busybody..]

Busy,


Get a job!

Badass nicepussy

I dont need one, thanx

 

[Guest]

 

[huskie]

I don't think it has anything to do with him being black but I'm sure they where ask not to press the issue of him changing his believes to Isslam????

 

[Guest]

 

[busybody..]

Grenades in our tent

The enemy within

Daniel Pipes raises very important questions in taking issue with the response of our government and media to the Muslim's in our society.

[...]This incident raises two issues.

First, the U.S. government's initial response indicates that, once again, it is ascribing violence by an American Muslim to purely personal causes. Here's its take on prior homicides:

* "A prescription drug for or consistent with depression" to explain why El Sayyid A. Nosair in 1990 shot Rabbi Meir Kahane.

* "Road rage" to explain why Rashid Baz in 1994 shot a Hassidic boy on the Brooklyn Bridge.

* "Many, many enemies in his mind" to explain why Ali Hasan Abu Kamal in 1997 shot a tourist on the Empire State Building's observation deck.

* "A work dispute" as why Hesham Mohamed Ali Hadayet in 2002 shot two people at the El Al counter of Los Angeles International Airport.

Akbar in 2003? U.S. Army spokespersons talk variously about an "attitude problem," a desire for "retribution" and "resentment."

The chief chaplain at Akbar's Fort Campbell, Ky., home base announces (completely without evidence) that the incident is "not an expression of faith."

No one yet knows Akbar's motives, but ignoring that it fits into a sustained pattern of political violence by American Muslims amounts to willful self-deception. When will officialdom acknowledge what is staring it in the face?

Its avoidance of reality has real consequences, increasing the dangers Americans face. "This country's officials are in a state of denial and confusion that is almost as frightening as the terrorism they are supposed to be fighting," observes Dennis Prager, only slightly exaggerating.

Second, the Akbar incident points to the suspect allegiance of some Muslims in government. The case of Gamal Abdel-Hafiz recently surfaced: an FBI agent whose colleagues say he twice refused to record conversations with suspected financiers of militant Islamic terrorism ("A Muslim does not record another Muslim"). [The Seattle Times reports three witnesses recalling that John Allen Muhammad, the man accused of the Washington, D.C.-area sniper murders last fall, had thrown a grenade into a tent during the 1991 war against Iraq.] Other cases are under investigation.

All of which reinforces what I wrote in January: "There is no escaping the unfortunate fact that Muslim government employees in law enforcement, the military and the diplomatic corps need to be watched for connections to terrorism, as do Muslim chaplains in prisons and the armed forces. Muslim visitors and immigrants must undergo additional background checks. Mosques require a scrutiny beyond that applied to churches and temples."

As Sgt. Womack noted, the enemy has already managed to "get into our camp." Do we have the will to stop him before he strikes again?

 

[busybody..]

So the military itself is responsible, says the family of Asan Akbar, the soldier accused of the fragging attack. They claim that the poor guy had to endure racism and go so far as to say that "... (it)was difficult for a black man "to make rank" in the military". Has anybody asked Colin Powell what to make of that comment? In any event, can someone explain to me why a victim of racism would complain that, upon being apprehended, "...You guys are coming into our countries, and you're going to rape our women and kill our children" ? I didn't know that Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were 'black' countries....