Christobal
Mostly I'm comfortable
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2016
- Posts
- 3,470
The R v D mainstream media brainwashing continues to work.
I'm not sure what you mean.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The R v D mainstream media brainwashing continues to work.
I'm not sure what you mean.
I presume R is for Republican and D is for Democrat, and he's pointing out that there are three other choices.
RvD = ROB VAN DAM!
[/QUOTE]
i could see you in that outfit.
I'm not sure what you mean.
I was asking about the media brain washing. As for the other choices that would be just a protest vote and a wasted vote. They have no chance of winning.
And that's what everyone says because the media tells them this and does everything they can to pretend R and D are the only choices available.
No matter how fucked up R v D is......the media brainwashes most of us into that mindset and so it is.
So again another micro minority is going to elect another fucking scum bag to office.
I don't think it is media brain washing. The real numbers don't add up. Even if every undecided voted for the third party they won't win. Hey, Ross Perot did a good job but never came close to winning.
I am hoping the future debates give me a clue. If not I will probably vote for Trump to see the political world turned upside down. Yes I know I'm voting for chaos but at least I'm for something new. Hillary is politician business as usual.
Do you really want more of the same?
I don't think it is media brain washing. The real numbers don't add up. Even if every undecided voted for the third party they won't win. Hey, Ross Perot did a good job but never came close to winning.
I am hoping the future debates give me a clue. If not I will probably vote for Trump to see the political world turned upside down. Yes I know I'm voting for chaos but at least I'm for something new. Hillary is politician business as usual.
Do you really want more of the same?
The likelihood of a candidate NOT winning a presidential election neither restricts your free choice among all available candidates nor does it necessarily condemn a "protest vote" to the category of being "wasted."
These are stigmas YOU are placing on your OWN motivations for participating in the electoral process.
THAT is what Botany Boy is trying to tell you.
I watched the whole thing and I can't think of a single substantive thing I learned that I didn't already know. It was a poor excuse for a debate.
The likelihood of a candidate NOT winning a presidential election neither restricts your free choice among all available candidates nor does it necessarily condemn a "protest vote" to the category of being "wasted."
These are stigmas YOU are placing on your OWN motivations for participating in the electoral process.
THAT is what Botany Boy is trying to tell you.
The hard and clear facts are it's Hillary or Trump. One of these people are going to win. No one else stands a chance. Any vote for any one else simply doesn't count. Maybe I could vote for the other candidates on principle but I still end up with Hillary or Trump.
There is always a choice (beside "my way or the highway"). You can choose to vote for who / what you want, or who / what you don't want. In some locales it doesn't matter. I can safely vote for Jill Stein because I know California won't go for Tromp. Not that Jill is any prize -- but she's not Tromp nor Clinton nor Johnson nor Bluto. You're in Florida and I know it's a bit dicier there. Still, choose: your conscience, or your gut.The hard and clear facts are it's Hillary or Trump. One of these people are going to win. No one else stands a chance.
I don't think it is media brain washing. The real numbers don't add up. Even if every undecided voted for the third party they won't win. Hey, Ross Perot did a good job but never came close to winning.
I am hoping the future debates give me a clue. If not I will probably vote for Trump to see the political world turned upside down. Yes I know I'm voting for chaos but at least I'm for something new. Hillary is politician business as usual.
Do you really want more of the same?
Absolutely, I want more of the same as opposed to the world being thrust into chaos. OF COURSE.
I don't think it is media brain washing. The real numbers don't add up. Even if every undecided voted for the third party they won't win. Hey, Ross Perot did a good job but never came close to winning.
I am hoping the future debates give me a clue. If not I will probably vote for Trump to see the political world turned upside down. Yes I know I'm voting for chaos but at least I'm for something new. Hillary is politician business as usual.
Do you really want more of the same?
Hint #3697 Cris is an Ishspawn...
HE KNOWS SHIT.
I just assumed it was one of que's from the jump.
I just assumed it was one of que's from the jump.