Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cheri said:Ignored once again....sigh
April said:GuyJD: why are you so rude?
GuyJD said:I am not at liberty to announce the vast majority of positive e-mails that I received from fellow Literoticans about that. They would probably get chewed out in the forum.
April said:Then why did you? I'm minding my own business, playing Pachisi and monitoring the board, and next thing I know, I'm being called stupid.![]()
Ambrosious said:OK, I'll go though it one more time. I post quite frequently, but I am not concerned about knocking off other threads, look how old this one is and it is STILL HERE! It has nothing to do with a childish, nanny nanny boo boo attitude. If it did, I would not have laid off the board for a week as Ambrosious.
The thing that I noticed while I left the board to the serious posters, was that just as many stupid and frivilous threads were started. So I registered two other names so I could post and see what happened. What happened? Nothing, not one word was said. The second thread I started in the same day drew an attack. That was #2 for the day. Just 2. This is after starting no less than 10 under assumed identities that drew NO flack. NONE.
So that started me thinking, is it just Ambrosious people have a problem with? Why? Jealousy? Hatred? Because I make them smile? I don't know. It isn't fair, but I'm not asking for fairness. Just to be left alone. Yes, you can, you left both of my other identities alone.
Now, for the number of threads and how they knock off some "serious" discussions, are you proposing that no one EVER start a new thread. Every new one kicks another one to page 2. Or are you saying that I can't express how I feel here freely, and let the board decide which thoughts are worth commenting on. YOU may not want to know whether or not I put mayo on my sandwich (a thread NOT started by me) but obviously some do. Look at the number of responses THAT got. Self censorship is painful to me. Maybe not you, but it is to me.
And lastly, the point of bringing this thread back (sorry Madison) was twofold. First point is that the good ol' days are gone, and crying about them will not bring them back. Lit has OVER 10,000 members now, compared to 3,000 when I joined. Second point is that no matter how old a thread is, it's still here!
I keep going back to it, but NO one has yet to explain WHY 3 DIFFERENT people cant post 4 threads daily, but ONE can't start 9 threads. Why is that? Why? I am really trying to understand your position, and understand why seeing my name pisses you off so badly.
That is where I am coming from, I hope it clears everything up. Once again, I am trying to understand YOUR position as well, it just makes no sense to me. Sorry, but it doesn't.
Whispersecret said:[ Well, that week DCL was very active. However, now he's gone again. I think he realized that when it all started up again that it was impossible to singlehandedly battle the volume of junk. I think maybe Melody could bring him back though.


Whispersecret said:Here’s what should happen. You should sign up to ICQ or MSN’s or AOL’s Instant Messenger, all of which are free. Get your buddy lists established. Then, when you see your friends are online at the same time you are, go talk to them! [/B]
Ambrosious said:Whispersecret said:<splutters> Geez. I'm turning into one of those old fogie posters, aren't I? Just slap me if I ever start complaining about "the good old days."![]()
Still want us to?![]()