Squad Pissed Infrastructure Senators Are White

That's because the dumb ass socialist communist keep making the headlines.

There is no such thing as a 'socialist communist'. You can't be that any more than you can be a 'Republican-Democrat'.
 
There is no such thing as a 'socialist communist'. You can't be that any more than you can be a 'Republican-Democrat'.

Another uneducated idiot that doesn't realize communist, are socialist. :D

They are not at all 100% opposed to each other like the (R)'z and (D)'eez.

YDB needs to go back to high school....finish that GED.
 
There is no such thing as a 'socialist communist'. You can't be that any more than you can be a 'Republican-Democrat'.

So was Lenin wrong when he named his Communist federal union "the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics?"
 
And was Fidel wrong when he declared "socialismo para siempre!!"?

In addition, was Webster wrong?:
Communism:
"a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian "socialism" and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the U.S.S.R.?
 
yeah, what would lenin and fidel castro know about communism and socialism? Let's all listen to a sputtering sausage like Luk

He sounds like veruca salt. makes his posts that much funnier.

"I want communism daddy! Give it to me now! I don't care how much it costs!".
 
He sounds like veruca salt. makes his posts that much funnier.

"I want communism daddy! Give it to me now! I don't care how much it costs!".

Can you imagine a government run by seething maniacs like this? Hayek's assertion that the worst get on top would be made true in spades.
 
So was Lenin wrong when he named his Communist federal union "the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics?"

Well, it wasn't the Union of Soviet Socialist Communist Republics.
But more to the point, socialists and communists were two different groups with two very different philosophies, and as a matter of fact they hated each other. Where Lenin stood and why the USSR got that name are complicated questions that do have answers, but it's not worth trying to explain those answers to the likes of you.
 
You need to learn history before saying dumb shit like this.

LMFAO!!!!

Luk can't answer the question, because then he'll be the one who looks like a dumbass.

Or is just too dishonest and much of a partisan shill for the comrades.
 
Can you imagine a government run by seething maniacs like this? Hayek's assertion that the worst get on top would be made true in spades.

Seriously...the uneducated are showing their hand.

YDB for an example.

Well, it wasn't the Union of Soviet Socialist Communist Republics.

LOL......yet it was both communist and socialist.

But more to the point, socialists and communists were two different groups with two very different philosophies, and as a matter of fact they hated each other.

Socialism is the communist economic model, all communist are socialist, though not all socialist are communist.

Take a basic poli-sci class FFS so your ignorance isn't so blatant.

REAL political science/philosophy, not a RAW or Salon opinion piece.

Where Lenin stood and why the USSR got that name are complicated questions that do have answers, but it's not worth trying to explain those answers to the likes of you.

Yea, because you'd look even sillier trying to explain how the most famous and "successful" socialist nation of all time, isn't actually socialist.

Ya got nothing but buuuu shit :D
 
Well, it wasn't the Union of Soviet Socialist Communist Republics.
But more to the point, socialists and communists were two different groups with two very different philosophies, and as a matter of fact they hated each other. Where Lenin stood and why the USSR got that name are complicated questions that do have answers, but it's not worth trying to explain those answers to the likes of you.

Bullshit.
 
Back
Top