Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given that so many people answered 'atypical' in the other poll going on, I'm surprised that not more of them went for the snowflake option.Okay, I marked special snowflake because damn it I have always wanted to be a special snowflake!!
Given that so many people answered 'atypical' in the other poll going on, I'm surprised that not more of them went for the snowflake option.
Given that so many people answered 'atypical' in the other poll going on, I'm surprised that not more of them went for the snowflake option.
Hey, don't worry. It just means that I'm more talented than those guys from the SM survey at coming up with inclusive options.I almost did. Just for fun - I wanna be a special snowflake. But the truth is that the option I chose fits how I really feel better. *pouts*
Hey, don't worry. It just means that I'm more talented than those guys from the SM survey at coming up with inclusive options.

OK people. Geez.
Of course this thread/poll was inspired by the hijack discussion about sig lines in another thread. So no, LSR doesn't suffer from a complex of persecution or paranoia is seeing a connection between both.
That being said, this thread was just me being bored and wanting to entertain myself. A new poll seemed like a good idea. That's all.
I was wondering when a special snowflake would finally show up!
I'm with you there. My main issue with sig lines are aesthetic. Some bother my aesthetic. Like all those cock shots av around here that annoy the shit out of me. Really, the only dick I want to be talking to is Homburg's Cock™. Without the visual.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v650/DuchsLove/bitch.gif
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v650/DuchsLove/kitty.gif
Now wouldn't they be FUN?!?!?!?!?
Actually, when I was a kid, nothing was worth it if it didn't sparkle. Then, my dad grew tired of my Walt Disney aesthetics, and put a moratorium on glitter.
Homburg said:Glitter is the herpes of the crafting world.
I think you may be on to something here.Is it just me, or does whining always end up ensuing when a good Top gets bored?
I think you may be on to something here.
And thanks for resisting the need to inflict visuals of The Cock™ on us.
Did you just come up with that?
-I'm loving it.
And here I was wondering what I wanted to use for my new sig line...
I think you may be on to something here.
And thanks for resisting the need to inflict visuals of The Cock™ on us.
I think I heard it somewhere in a different form. Something like "Glitter is like herpes. It spreads everywhere and never goes away" or something.
That's why I don't turn mine off. I wish we could selectively turn some off and leave others on. There are some that really annoy me. But it's just the internet, I'm not going to bitch about somethng so minor when there are real life battles more worth my energy.
I don't turn them off because I like to read them....in moderation. It helps me remember who people are as I'm terrible with names. There are only about 10 people on this board that I really REMEMBER, I'm that bad at it :/ So sig lines and AVs help me keep people straight a bit easier.....
Oh - don't get me started on this one.Can you tell gum chewing is a pet peeve of mine? Yes, yes it is....
Oh - don't get me started on this one.
I think I may be an easily annoyed person. Or easily annoying, depending on your perspective.
I'm a designer so this is one of my favorite posters....
http://www.lozives.co.uk/work_glitter.html
as for me, I like knowing how people represent themselves, that's the only reason I keep the AV's and Sig lines on. Otherwise I'd have them off in a second. I like the K.I.S.S. approach to things, so blinky flashy crap, changing text color and rose icons are not my style. There's also been times when I'm not sure if the person is still talking or if that's the start of their Sig line.
I think the only sig line that's ever made me really irritated is the one with the cheerleaders in it. I don't even remember/know the user's name, but I know that the image is drastically too wide for the forum layout and my laptop browser, and I don't get it. Is there something funny in the photo I'm missing? Why that photo?
that would be MasterPhoenix and the reason for it is that he's a Raider fan and the picture is of the Raiderettes....
Wow, I totally didn't realize this thread was about you. I must have missed some big drama elsewhere. IMHO your sig is not that bad. You'd have to try harder to make it annoying, I think. Add some big images, some animation, and about 15 more lines of BIG text, and then it might be annoying.not meaning to take this personal, but it's obvious why this thread was started. no offense to the OP of this thread..because it's interesting to read everyone's thoughts, but i just don't understand why it's such a BIG deal. ya know??
Unfortunately I don't think Lit supports HTML in sigs I'm pretty sure specifying width is not possible in BBcode, but I could be wrong!ah ok.
at the end of his image tag just inside the end bracket he could put width="400" and the entire image would be more then awesome.
btw, I'm sure I could have looked up who it was but i was trying to avoid saying names becasue I don't have any issues with people here.
"they are a raiders fan and those are raiders cheerleaders" would have sufficed.