Science Proves Exotic Cars Turn Women On!

john-the-author

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 6, 2004
Posts
1,845
The photo they used for this was really appealing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Science Proves Exotic Cars Turn Women On
By Keith Barry September 04, 2008 | 1:07:47 PM Categories: Autopia, WTF? Dept.

A study commissioned by a phallically named insurance company proves beyond all doubt that the unbridled roar of an Italian supercar turns women on but the soft purr of a fuel-efficient econobox doesn't stimulate anyone's MPG-spot.

David Moxon subjected 40 men and women to the sounds of a Maserati, Lamborghini and Ferrari, then measured the amount of testosterone in their saliva. He found everyone had higher levels of the stuff -- a measure of their arousal -- after hearing the revving exotics, but the amount the women had was off the charts.

The econobox, however, left everyone colder than a January day in Nome.

The study was commissioned by the ultra-exclusive British insurer Hiscox (we swear we're not making this up), which was curious to know how people respond to high-end luxury cars. "We knew owners of luxury cars felt a connection with the sound of their vehicles," says Steve Langan, managing director of the insurance company. "We have now scientifically proven the physical attraction people feel when it comes to cars."

To test the theory that high-performance cars get people hot, Moxon had 40 men and women listen to recordings of the three Italian exotics and a Volkswagen Polo. Everyone had significantly more testosterone after hearing the exotics, and all of the women were turned on by the Maserati. The guys, on the other hand, were drawn to the Lamborghini.

“We saw significant peaks in the amount of testosterone in the body, particularly in women," Maxon says, noting that even women who said they had no interest in cars were turned on. "Testosterone is indicative of positive arousal in the human body so we can confidently conclude from the results out today that the roar of a luxury car engine actually does cause a primeval physiological response.”

As for the Polo? Everyone had less testosterone after listening to it. That means the acceleratus interruptus of a Prius going all-electric in traffic is automotive equivalent of skin flicks starring previous secretaries of state, despite General Motors' claim that nearly nine out of 10 women would rather talk to a guy in a hybrid than a Porsche.

Don't buy it? Check out these videos of Maserati, Lamborghini and VW Polo exhaust notes and tell us how you feel afterward. Be forewarned, though -- we are not responsible for any primeval responses they cause.

http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/09/weve-got-some-b.html
 
I wonder if it is more conditioning than auditory arousal. Exotic cars sound powerful, and we know that those cars are associated with high dollar price tags. Are the women associating the roar of the masserati with the wallet needed to buy one? What if they played the roar of the early 69 Mustang with the 302? is it the power of the engine or the wealth needed to buy the power.

Could they do a similar test with sounds they are unfamiliar with but have similar qualities? What about doing it in aboriginal communities where cars are exotic cars in particular are not as associated?

I think this is just science turned advertising and a way for a bunch of geeks to get to play wit fast cars and say "yeah I got all these women turned on with my research".

(why didn't I think of this?)
 
Sorry. Couldn't care less.

In fact, I get entirely turned off by the pricetag and conspicuous consumption.

And yeah. I'm a girl.

I do go for big brains under the hood though.
 
So...this means the women wanted the cars, right? Not the men in the cars :devil:
 
Give me a fast car that looks hot and growls any day. :D
 
Oh, I'm sure it's a social conditioning thing to a very large extent. It's just interesting how deep the conditioning runs.
 
I'd love to try the Magic Christian experiment some day and throw a million dollars into a cesspit.

Just to see how deep the social conditioning runs. :devil:
 
For me, it's the auditory promise of fast forward motion and high-torque turns.
And the vibrations travelling up from my pelvic bones... It's all physical.
The price tag is meaningless, and the wealth of the owner, as a solo factor, is more a turn-off than turn-on.
 
For me, it's the auditory promise of fast forward motion and high-torque turns.
And the vibrations travelling up from my pelvic bones... It's all physical.
The price tag is meaningless, and the wealth of the owner, as a solo factor, is more a turn-off than turn-on.

I don't know about current sports models. Most of them have started looking so much alike that they blur into one another. Old ones, though . . . I remember when someone enterprising type decided that the Sunbeam Alpine was cute but gutless and dropped a big V-8 into one and created the Sunbeam Tiger! Oh, yeah. Then a copycat decided that a small block Ford would go right nice into an Austin Healy! That's my kind of style, tweed cap, Morrocan leather gloves, Italian driving shoes and jet-assisted take-off under the hood. Snarl!
 
I'm talking
65 Mustang K-car, with a 500 HP 289,
64 Stingray feulie engine and a 980 Holly,
69 Z-28...

And a 1970 Mach1.
 
Last edited:
I'll go scout on E-bay for a -82 Trabant then.

Doesn't get much more exotic than that.

Unless of course "exotic" is a more politically correct way of saying "expensive".
 
And of course, The Old Man had to dictate the particulars-- I only remember driving them.:cattail:
 
Back
Top