Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

Counselor706

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Posts
2,665
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.
Source
 
Adam Schiff mischaracterizes almost everything when it's in his interests to do so. Just look at how he leveraged the falsehoods and gossip in the Steel Dossier in order to claim he had mountains of evidence proving Trump was a Russian agent, or how he lied about having met with the "whistleblower" prior to him reporting to the ICIG.
 
Parnas will sink Trump.

Parnas is Cohen II and will wind up just like Cohen, in prison. All he's trying to do is lessen his sentence, like Cohen tried to do. As long as there are people like you, prone to propaganda, similar weasels will continue to have a friendly ear to lie into. Nobody except you and the radical left gives this guy any credibility whatsoever. But do dream on.:rolleyes:
 
Parnas is Cohen II and will wind up just like Cohen, in prison. All he's trying to do is lessen his sentence, like Cohen tried to do. As long as there are people like you, prone to propaganda, similar weasels will continue to have a friendly ear to lie into. Nobody except you and the radical left gives this guy any credibility whatsoever. But do dream on.:rolleyes:

Trump gave him credibility when he attended the same parties and events as Parnas. Taking pictures with him and then in typical Trump fashion, pretends he knows nothing about Parnas. Only retarded republican hacks like you believe otherwise.
 
Trump gave him credibility when he attended the same parties and events as Parnas. Taking pictures with him and then in typical Trump fashion, pretends he knows nothing about Parnas. Only retarded republican hacks like you believe otherwise.

This is your problem, always lying about Trumps' actions, motives, knowledge, and associations. The President is seen with and photographed with thousands of people he doesn't know or associate with.:rolleyes:
 
This is your problem, always lying about Trumps' actions, motives, knowledge, and associations. The President is seen with and photographed with thousands of people he doesn't know or associate with.:rolleyes:


That's quite literally the same that Trump said yesterday. Can you not form an original thought or do you let the retard in charge think for you, homo?
 
The truth will come out:


Giuliani Accuses Lev Parnas Of Lying, Brings Up Possibility Of Tape Recordings

Chuck Ross
Investigative Reporter

Rudy Giuliani on Monday accused his former associate, Lev Parnas, of telling multiple lies during a media tour last week, including about whether Attorney General William Barr was aware of the Trump lawyer’s activities related to Ukraine.

“I will tell you this definitively, I never spoke to Attorney General Barr about this investigation. Never once,” Giuliani told Fox News’s Laura Ingraham.

Giuliani was responding to Parnas’s claims in interviews with CNN and MSNBC last week that it was “impossible” that Barr was unaware that Parnas worked closely with Giuliani in 2019 to collect and disseminate information related to Ukraine.

Parnas helped Giuliani arrange interviews with former Ukrainian prosecutors regarding Joe and Hunter Biden. Giuliani and Parnas also coordinated with other Trump allies to push for Marie Yovanovitch’s removal as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. (RELATED: Lev Parnas Requests William Barr’s Recusal)

“Mr. Barr had to have known everything,” Parnas told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in an interview on Jan. 15. “That is a flat-out, absolute, despicable lie,” Giuliani responded Monday.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/21/rudy-giuliani-lev-parnas-despicable-lie/
 
If the truth comes out, it won't be from the fucking daily caller. Why do insist on posting bullshit from fake news sources? Trump wouldn't like that.
 
If the truth comes out, it won't be from the fucking daily caller. Why do insist on posting bullshit from fake news sources? Trump wouldn't like that.

So you're saying the video of the Laura Ingraham interview linked in the article didn't happen?
 
Schiff intentionally lied to the Senate about Parnas talking to Zelinsky. He knew he wasn't talking to Zelinsky but to Zlochevsky. This is because Schiff is genetically predisposed to lying. He needs to be put under oath and made to testify before the Senate. Note this is from a left wing source:

Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

Unredacted material shows he may have referred to the wrong "Mr. Z."

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/schiff-parnas-trump-evidence-101832
 
Schiff intentionally lied to the Senate about Parnas talking to Zelinsky. He knew he wasn't talking to Zelinsky but to Zlochevsky. This is because Schiff is genetically predisposed to lying. He needs to be put under oath and made to testify before the Senate. Note this is from a left wing source:

Schiff may have mischaracterized Parnas evidence, documents show

Unredacted material shows he may have referred to the wrong "Mr. Z."

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/schiff-parnas-trump-evidence-101832

you just posted the same article as the OP which only proves that you don't read anything before you post. :(
 
you just posted the same article as the OP which only proves that you don't read anything before you post. :(

I was simply reminding the person I was conversing with who was so invested in the veracity of the "evidence." In addition, Schiff repeated the lie before the Senate yesterday, which the article doesn't address. Schiff didn't just "mischaracterize" the evidence, he purposely lied about it.
 

Hang on there now skippy! You post an article railing that Schiff 'may have mis-characterized' a text and you totally ignore the Donald's 15,000 outright lies, fabrications and 'facts' manufactured from smoke over the last three years? Really? Really really?? Fuck oh dear.


Comshaw
 
Back
Top