Romney got a higher % of the white vote than Reagan did in 1980

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
So much for the country becoming more liberal. The only reason it seems that way is because non-whites vote for Democrats for racial reasons. They don't necessarily agree them on other issues.
 
Lesson: The white vote is not enough and there's no reason why it should be.
 
So much for the country becoming more liberal. The only reason it seems that way is because non-whites vote for Democrats for racial reasons. They don't necessarily agree them on other issues.


I don't think America is becoming all that much more liberal. Maybe somewhat.

Americans are mostly voting for Democrats at an increasing rate because Republicans are irrational and willfully attack and alienate half the electorate because it makes them feel good. Oh and the bigoty. There's that.
 
So much for the country becoming more liberal. The only reason it seems that way is because non-whites vote for Democrats for racial reasons. They don't necessarily agree them on other issues.
You lost the election. Get over it.
 
Reagan didn't campaign on a "White Folks Uber Alles" plan like Romney did, and attracted votes across the political spectrum.

The Mormon focused exclusively on white voters, because his handlers truly believed that colored folks would stay home.
 
So much for the country becoming more liberal. The only reason it seems that way is because non-whites vote for Democrats for racial reasons. They don't necessarily agree them on other issues.

^^^^^Needs to face reality. Obama received 43% of the white vote in 2008.
 
Reagan didn't campaign on a "White Folks Uber Alles" plan like Romney did, and attracted votes across the political spectrum.

The Mormon focused exclusively on white voters, because his handlers truly believed that colored folks would stay home.

You're amazing. And, not in a good way.
 
Let me me restate this, for the liberal hardliners on here who seem to be missing the point.

Whites don't vote based on race, for the most part. They vote on other issues, and on those issues they are still voting 60% against Democrats nationally (and that was with a suppressed white turnout).

A majority of voters from other races vote largely based on race. They won't vote for what they feel is the "white people party" (however absurd and erroneous that view is). We have no idea how they would vote if you took race out of the equation, but there's no reason to believe their voting patterns would be different than for whites if race wasn't a factor.
 
Let me me restate this, for the liberal hardliners on here who seem to be missing the point.

Whites don't vote based on race, for the most part. They vote on other issues, and on those issues they are still voting 60% against Democrats nationally (and that was with a suppressed white turnout).

A majority of voters from other races vote largely based on race. They won't vote for what they feel is the "white people party" (however absurd and erroneous that view is). We have no idea how they would vote if you took race out of the equation, but there's no reason to believe their voting patterns would be different than for whites if race wasn't a factor.

Explain to us, then, how any Hispanic with a lick of common sense should vote for a Republican candidate who has made demonizing non-whites a core portion of his platform.

Republicans have successfully trained poor white trash to vote against their interests, that success doesn't seem to have spread to other demographics. Maybe an intelligence thing?
 
Let me me restate this, for the liberal hardliners on here who seem to be missing the point.

Whites don't vote based on race, for the most part. They vote on other issues, and on those issues they are still voting 60% against Democrats nationally (and that was with a suppressed white turnout).

A majority of voters from other races vote largely based on race. They won't vote for what they feel is the "white people party" (however absurd and erroneous that view is). We have no idea how they would vote if you took race out of the equation, but there's no reason to believe their voting patterns would be different than for whites if race wasn't a factor.

You don't know many white people, do you?
 
Back
Top