deckardB26354
Virgin
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Posts
- 1,386
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reichguide ignores factual voter fraud and posts hypothetical nonsense instead. He's never met a fact that he couldn't dismiss.
Judge Orders Redo Of 2022 Judicial Race In Texas After More Than 1,400 Illegal Votes Cast
BY: BRIANNA *****
MAY 16, 2024
3 MIN READ
A judge ordered that a 2022 Texas judicial election must be redone after finding more than a thousand illegal ballots were cast, far exceeding the margin of victory.
Judge David Peeples ruled Wednesday that the 2022 race between Republican Tami Pierce and Democrat DaSean Jones for the 180th District Court in Harris County must be held again after finding “the true outcome [of the election] cannot be determined.”
Pierce contested the race after losing by just 449 votes to incumbent Jones. Jones, however, filed a motion to dismiss — which was later rebuked by Peebles as being “frivolous.”
Peeples ultimately found 1,430 invalid votes were cast, and declared it was “not realistic or feasible to determine which candidate received those votes.”
More here: https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/1...exas-after-more-than-1400-illegal-votes-cast/
Seriously? You're on board with the "Only Way We Can Lose Is If They Cheat!" nonsense that Maga is peddling?The governors and secretaries of state in most of the swing states are Dems. They may decide the election.
Eh, that's not even in the top twenty most absurd things he's said lately.Seriously? You're on board with the "Only Way We Can Lose Is If They Cheat!" nonsense that Maga is peddling?![]()
That just isn't true. Voter fraud is extremely rare and has been for decades, and the very few cases that did occur last time were all on the same side - the Republicans - although at least one of them claimed he only did it in retaliation from the apocryphal stories of cheating Democrats. The fact is, the Republicans have won the popular vote exactly once in the past eight elections (and that was with an incumbent who had in fact won the last time out by cheating). There is absolutely no reason to think they won't win again this time, legitimately. Especially against the most polarizing nominee of at least the last hundred years.Not the only way, but currently the most likely, in recently expanded gray areas of plausible legality.
You don't have the stones to address the numerous counts of actual voter fraud committed by trumpers in your own thread, Jack.Democrats are inherently corrupt and they corrupt all who are around them.
What election issue is this reporting?Democrats are inherently corrupt and they corrupt all who are around them.
Why would a Democrat stop doing the frauding?Oregon Gov. calls for DMV to pause automatic voter registration as number of people mistakenly added to voter rolls grows
By Dirk VanderHart (OPB) and Lauren Dake (OPB)
Oct. 7, 2024 4:07 p.m.
The state has unearthed hundreds more people than previously known who were improperly registered to vote under Oregon’s motor voter law.
The latest tally includes 302 people identified on Monday, according to an “after-action” report ordered by Gov. Tina Kotek. The latest numbers add to the 1,259 people who officials with the state’s Driver and Motor Vehicle Services office and Secretary of State had earlier revealed were registered in error.
Kotek has called on the DMV to pause the process of automatically registering drivers to vote through the state’s motor voter law.
Monday’s release from the DMV’s office notes 123 new people were mistakenly added through previously identified clerical errors. But the state discovered a new error: Another 178 people from the U.S. territories of American Samoa and Swains Island have been wrongly classified as U.S. citizens.
More here on Oregon's outlaw Democrats: https://www.opb.org/article/2024/10...les-voter-registration-voting-vote-elections/
That's the peril of not reading beyond the bias confirmation headline.Why would a Democrat stop doing the frauding?
Another one of these.Democrats Panic After Georgia Election Board Subpoenas ALL 2020 ELECTION RECORDS from Fulton County – Liz Harrington Weighs In (VIDEO)
by Jim Hoft Oct. 9, 2024 9:20 pm329 Comments
What are they hiding?
The Georgia State Election Board it working overtime in an attempt to investigate the controversial 2020 election and to clean up the future elections in the state.
However, officials in Fulton County continue to refuse to work with State Election Board. But that may soon change.
The Georgia State Election Board voted 3-2 to subpoena ALL of the election records from Fulton County during the 2020 election. This will not turn out well for Fulton County.
More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/democrats-panic-after-georgia-election-board-subpoenas-all/
Democrats Panic After Georgia Election Board Subpoenas ALL 2020 ELECTION RECORDS from Fulton County – Liz Harrington Weighs In (VIDEO)
by Jim Hoft Oct. 9, 2024 9:20 pm329 Comments
What are they hiding?
The Georgia State Election Board it working overtime in an attempt to investigate the controversial 2020 election and to clean up the future elections in the state.
However, officials in Fulton County continue to refuse to work with State Election Board. But that may soon change.
The Georgia State Election Board voted 3-2 to subpoena ALL of the election records from Fulton County during the 2020 election. This will not turn out well for Fulton County.
More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/democrats-panic-after-georgia-election-board-subpoenas-all/
1. There is absolutely nothing unethical about what you describe here.It's not officially "cheating" if a tactic is within the boundaries of plausible legality. One that may get heavy use is waiting to see how many more votes they need, checking the list of votes rejected for technical errors, contacting those voters, and giving them a chance to vote again. But now the Pubs have seen that trick, and may do it themselves.
It's entirely possible Reichguide did read the whole thing and failed to put two and two together and grasp that this is a case of a Democrat putting a stop to voter fraud. He's been known to make citations that actually prove him wrong, and even quote the exact line that proves him wrong, all the while making it clear that he missed the point.That's the peril of not reading beyond the bias confirmation headline.
1. There is absolutely nothing unethical about what you describe here.
2. I doubt if you have any evidence whatsoever of Democrats actually doing that anyway (as opposed to baseless rumors from the usual suspects).
3. The Republicans were already aware of that trick, you can count on it. (Of course, it's not their MO - that would be making it much easier to vote in predominantly red areas than blue ones - but that's beside the point.)
ETA: I have never heard of a case of either party contacting voters whose votes were rejected and letting them vote again. (And neither have you, Chernosoth - not a legitimate case anyway.) What I was thinking of was fighting to allow the original votes to be counted if the voter had a right to vote and the intent on the ballot was clear. And that is perfectly ethical.
It's entirely possible Reichguide did read the whole thing and failed to put two and two together and grasp that this is a case of a Democrat putting a stop to voter fraud. He's been known to make citations that actually prove him wrong, and even quote the exact line that proves him wrong, all the while making it clear that he missed the point.
Neither of those links describes what Chernosoth said. (Possibly it's what he meant, but it's not what he said.) There's nothing there about "waiting to see how many votes they need" or "giving them a chance to vote again" (since technically, they did not vote the first time; they only tried to do so). Most important of all, the situations in your links are before Election Day, whereas Chernosoth appears to think the Dems are pushing for do-overs after the fact. Which they are not.Somebody is either a liar or isn't up on the tricks D's play during an election.
https://triblive.com/local/regional...ealing-mail-in-ballot-rejections-court-rules/
https://www.investing.com/news/worl...nia-voters-from-curing-mailin-ballots-3651851
Neither of those links describes what Chernosoth said. (Possibly it's what he meant, but it's not what he said.) There's nothing there about "waiting to see how many votes they need" or "giving them a chance to vote again" (since technically, they did not vote the first time; they only tried to do so). Most important of all, the situations in your links are before Election Day, whereas Chernosoth appears to think the Dems are pushing for do-overs after the fact. Which they are not.
Somebody is either a liar or isn't up on the tricks D's play during an election.
https://triblive.com/local/regional...ealing-mail-in-ballot-rejections-court-rules/