Safe_Bet
No she's not back I'm Amy
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Posts
- 8,663
I've seen every one of the aforementioned 'cartoons' (I prefer 'Animated Features', but I digress) plus dozens more and enjoyed them all thoroughly. Comparing Pixar with Dreamworks fr' instance is comparing apples and oranges or rather comparing Jack Kirby's style to John Romita, Russ Heath or Steve Ditko's. They're in the same gente, but that's about it.
In re: 'Images' in animated features, never forget they're escapist fantasies, not indoctrination films to encourage feminist sensibilities or political correctness. They're fun and that's enough. All this 'body image', one's place in society and male oppression crap belongs somewhere else, not in animated features. They're meant to entertain.
Comic books and 'graphic novels' have already climbed on the PC bandwagon with minority, gay and 'strong women' characters which hasn't detracted from the story lines one iota, but a lot of them are aimed at teens and adults. I've seen children as young as 5 in animated feature audiences, let them have fun, not be indoctrinated in today's version of what's right and wrong about society.![]()
But dude they already ARE being indoctrinated through those venues. It's just that you happen to agree with what was/is being produced so to you it's fine. For some of us have a few animated/cartoon/comic book heroines who didn't end up in the arms of a big brave man, marrying a freakin prince or always being the "helpless, screaming blonde getting carried away by the bad guy" would have been fantastic. You might call it PC but for me it would have been refreshing "equal time".
'Sides, how in the hell would it have hurt anybody if Wonder Woman would have been a way cool Amazon dyke instead of marrying some douche named Steve???
