Byron In Exile
Frederick Fucking Chopin
- Joined
- May 3, 2002
- Posts
- 66,591
WARMACHINE said:Let me fess up. There is an apartment complex there, but for the life of me I can't remember the name. Villas at Prestonwood creek of something like that?? Anyway, I lived there about two years ago. That apartment number is valid too. However, I don't know anyone named Bill Steward. I made that name up on a whim.
What kind of an imbecile would believe that someone would post up their real address on an anonymous internet website? I can't figure out why someone would waste their time with an internet pissing contest....like I'm going to fly to California and whip LT's ass or he is going to fly here....all just because of something said on a message board. LOL. The whole idea of carrying a grudge for such a thing is ludicrous.
Emerald_eyed said:ya know wat would suck?
If LT seriously got on a plane and went there to kick someones ass.....and someone answered the door and was beaten to death or something.
Do you think posting a real apt number and address was all that smart? Even f it wasnt yours?
Does anyone here ever give deeop thought to their actions and possible consiquences?
Byron In Exile said:roflmao!
I'd sooner expect a visit from Mickey Mouse.
Emerald_eyed said:Or a lunatic.
It was posted on a public board, for anyone to see.
What about anyone else who lives in the area?
It was just stupid.
His or not, he amits to it being a real address.
POsting it was very irrisponsible.
The point here, which you obviously missed, is that nobody is going to go to all that trouble over an unverified address of an unknown person from a dubious source.Byron In Exile said:I don't want to alarm you unnecessarily, but right now, in your phone book, there are hundreds of thousands of real addresses, published, for anyone to see.
In fact, if you go outside, you may see dozens of houses and apartments, whose address you don't even need to know. You can just walk up to the door, knock on it, and beat the crap out of whomever answers. And you won't have to arrange for round-trip plane tickets, hotel accomodations, or the rest of it.
The only point you made here is that you missed my point completely. You've presented a different scenario, where you set someone up the same way LT did. And what does anyone working four jobs have to do with anything?Emerald_eyed said:Right, no shit Hserlock. Naming the phone book...thats the exact same thing!![]()
Ok, say I post a fake address saying it is me......I have had a net stalker
He says "bingo" Goes to that house, A 30 year old widow and mother of 4 lives there (who knows) Anyway, this person who had been following me, beats down the door, rapes and murders her....leaves her kids without both parents, yet she didnt even have anything do do with it since she is working 4 jobs to support her children.
Giving an address online, saying it is you, when it isnt is irresponsible.
You cant see that? Well think about it and grow up before trying to make excuses.
*edited to add.
I do not have a net stalker.....It was to make a point
Exactly. And who did that?Angel said:The difference is, this address was posted all over newsgroups in connection to racist propaganda and other bullshit that could set some fucktard off.
Who took an address which might have belonged to anybody, and without knowing for certain whose address it was, posted it all over newsgroups in connection to racist propaganda and other bullshit in hopes of setting some fucktard off?
Byron In Exile said:That was LovingTongue's idea, and his intent.
In fact, however, LT's postings were dismissed as the work of a troll, making a juvenile attempt to have some unsuspecting "fucktard," as you put it, carry out an assault for him.
In any case, is it the person posting a random address, or the person making racist postings and attaching that address to them in an effort to incite criminal activity who is culpable?
In reality, of course, no self-respecting fucktard would risk going to jail over someone else's internet feud, even if it involved walking next door.
Slim to none? What would you guess the probability is, statistically? How many times has someone posted a random address on Usenet, and had some other random person go to that address and kill the person who lived there?Angel said:Honestly, I doubt anything will happen. I think the chances are slim to none.
However, I do think it was irresponsible on both of their parts to both use/post the address in the first place and then to take it to the newsgroups as it was.
Yes, the chances are slim, but nowadays with all of the fucked up people using the internet, you just can't be too careful - and if something were to happen to the person living at that address, the both of them should be held fully responsible for it.
It has nothing to do with 'self respect' and everything to do with anger/emotional reaction/mental instability.
A responsible adult wouldn't put some innocent, unknowing party at risk - no matter how small - over a stupid internet brawl.
Crazier things have happened.
Assuming you're talking about this: "In reality, of course, no self-respecting fucktard would risk going to jail over someone else's internet feud, even if it involved walking next door." — then let me rephrase and hopefully clarify it for you, since the "self-respecting fucktard" phrase apparently whizzed over your head:Emerald_eyed said:you are assuming everyone on the net is self respecting and mentally stable
In reality, nobody would risk going to jail over someone else's internet feud, even if it involved walking next door. If you posit a person who is that mentally unstable, why would they be sitting and reading Usenet newsgroups day after day looking for addresses of people to murder? How long will they have to wait before they find a local one? It might be ten years. Or never. And even then, why waste time on an address that could be fake or even some sort of trap or set-up?
What Warmachine did, posting an address and claiming it was his, was contrary to the Lit guidelines, and it was removed. It was an unwise thing to do, whether it was his or not, and I never claimed it was "okay." As for his responsibility for any criminal thing done with that address, I've already said what I think about that.Byron In Exile said:You might have a case against LT, since he was attempting to incite a crime. But that Warmachine would be in any way responsible for another person's criminal activity is absurd. If he had provided his own address in good faith, then you're saying he would be responsible for any crime perpetrated against himself. His posting of his address would have made the crime possible, but that doesn't make him culpable for the crime. It's like the idea that women who reveal too much cleavage are responsible for their own rapes. Criminals have to be held responsible for their crimes, and that such a simple fact eludes people these days is why the justice system is so fucked up. It's never the criminal's fault, because he was abused as a child, or didn't get the scholarship, or someone posted an address on the internet and he got angry.Angel said:Honestly, I doubt anything will happen. I think the chances are slim to none.
However, I do think it was irresponsible on both of their parts to both use/post the address in the first place and then to take it to the newsgroups as it was.
Yes, the chances are slim, but nowadays with all of the fucked up people using the internet, you just can't be too careful - and if something were to happen to the person living at that address, the both of them should be held fully responsible for it.We'd best tread lightly around them then, so as not to set them off.It has nothing to do with 'self respect' and everything to do with anger/emotional reaction/mental instability.What's an "internet brawl"? Bits flying around over optical cables? "Stupid" may be accurate, but "brawl" is giving it a bit too much credit, I think.A responsible adult wouldn't put some innocent, unknowing party at risk - no matter how small - over a stupid internet brawl.
You don't even know whether the address is real or not. All you have is Warmachine's assertion that it's real. Someone in one of the newsgroups tried to locate it and said it isn't real.
For the sake of argument, let's say that Warmachine posted a real address and then let's say that that was irresponsible. Who the hell is "Warmachine"? Don't you realize how ridiculous this becomes? There's no way to stop any anonymous person from posting any random address at any time on Usenet and saying it's anything they want to say it is.
If you want to scold whomever is behind the Warmachine ID about it, then go ahead. Tell him he was irresponsible, and see what he says.
If you're genuinely concerned that someone in Plano, Texas has been put at risk, here, why don't you send a letter to "resident" at that address and warn them so they can take the necessary steps to protect themselves? That would be the responsible thing to do.
What LovingTongue did with it, however, was, and I think Heretic was an order of magnitude off here, a hundred times worse, because he used it repeatedly in an attempt to cause criminal acts to be committed upon the occupant of that address, not even knowing who that might be. Even so, the chances of anything coming of it are practically zero, for reasons stated above.
So, to sum up what I think for Emerald Eyed, I don't agree that what Warmachine did was "just stupid," or "very irrisponsible (sic)," and the fact that "he amits (sic) to it being a real address" is meaningless, since it may not even exist. If it did, I would call posting it "unwise," but I would reserve "stupid" and "very irresponsible" as terms to describe posting an unknown address in african-american culture newsgroups with subject lines like "I need money to go shoot niggers."

